Las Vegas Sun

April 21, 2014

Currently: 74° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

In immigration debate, familiar signs of strain resurface

Image

ASSOCIATED PRESS

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid speaks with reporters about immigration reform, intelligence leaks and other issues following a Democratic strategy session on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, June 11, 2013.

After a promisingly bipartisan start to immigration reform Tuesday, senators retreated to either side of the party line Wednesday, trading procedural barbs that prevented lawmakers from voting on amendments.

The breakdown began when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid suggested the Senate vote on the first group of five immigration amendments, including two that would have required the border to be certified as secure before undocumented immigrants could get provisional legal or permanent resident status.

Reid, who doesn’t support such changes, suggested all amendments have to pass a filibuster-proof, 60-vote threshold. And that’s when Sen. Chuck Grassley — the author of one of them — cried foul.

“There is no reason, particularly in this first week, and the beginning of the process, to be blocking our amendments with a 60-vote margin,” Grassley said. “It really looks like the fix is in and the bill is rigged to pass basically as it is.”

Reid has been in a standoff with Republicans for years about what he alleges is overuse of the filibuster by GOP. So it was with apparent reserved delight that Reid pointed out the irony of the moment.

“How many times have we heard the Republican leader say on this floor and publicly that the new reality in the United States Senate is 60?” Reid said. “I mean, this is what he said. That’s why we’re having 60 votes on virtually everything.”

It still remains unclear whether Reid plans to make good on implied threats that he will seek to undo the filibuster rule for the remainder of this Congress. Reid has said, however, that he will not allow anything, especially a change in the rules, to interfere with the immigration bill.

But it wasn’t just Reid who went into combat mode against amendments Wednesday: Gang of Eight Sens. John McCain, a Republican, and Chuck Schumer, a Democrat, laid into Texas Republican Sen. John Cornyn Wednesday afternoon over the details of his sweeping border security amendment, which Reid has already identified as a poison pill.

Cornyn’s amendment would also delay the provisional status and pathways to citizenship the Senate immigration bill creates for undocumented immigrants until border security markers are met. Cornyn’s bill also steps up those benchmarks, demanding, among other things, almost three times as many new Border Patrol agents as are called for in the underlying bill.

Cornyn argued that his bill paid for all the changes from a trust fund already established under the bill to pay for border security and other reforms.

“It’s incredible that the senator should stand there and say, ‘Yeah, we’re adding these thousands of personnel, but we’re not adding to the cost,’” McCain said, accusing Cornyn of eschewing “basic first-grade mathematics” in proposing he could divert trust fund money to a new endeavor without driving up the overall cost of the bill.

“It is quite arguable that the entire trust fund is used by those 6,500 [extra border patrol agents]. That would mean no drones, no helicopters; it may mean no fencing,” Schumer said. “It will take a highly efficient way of preventing people from crossing the border and replace it with an inefficient way.”

But whether it’s Reid or a two-party tag team of senators resisting amendments on the basis of procedure or substance, some Republicans whose votes may be critical to passing immigration reform are starting to bristle at the pushback.

Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch is the only non-Gang of Eight Republican who voted for the comprehensive immigration bill in the Judiciary Committee — with the caveat that his continued support would depend on whether the full Senate cleared his amendments requiring undocumented immigrants to pay back taxes.

Hatch is one of the Republican senators who started to cast serious doubts about his continued support Wednesday, after it became clear that the initial momentum to consider amendments was faltering in the face of political disagreements.

“I was promised by leaders in the Gang of Eight that they would work with me … and yet I’ve had some indication over the last few days that maybe they’re not going to work with me,” Hatch said. “As I’ve said, I’d like to support the bill, and make no mistake about it, I don’t want people stiffing me on things I consider to be important … and I’m not the kind of guy who takes that lightly.”

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 5 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Same as it ever was with this do-nothing Senate..."feel good" bills survive committee, usually on a party line vote, the bill moves to the floor where it dies or is so clogged with irrelevant amendments that it is unrecognizable.

    PREDICTION: There will be no immigration reform bill passed in the United States Senate. Then, the equally useless HR won't have to worry about creating their version of the legislation, while John Boehner laughs his a** off.

  2. Why is Harry so concerned about non-citizens when the result would financially harm Americans? Organized Black Business Association is vehemently AGAINST saying illegals are stealing jobs from Black Americans. Define Treason--aiding a foreign power/foreigners OVER American citizens.

  3. The first step towards BORDER SECURITY would be ENFORCEMENT AGAINST EMPLOYERS OF ILLEGALS. The second step would be rooting the illegals OUT OF OUR SOCIAL SAFETY NET--they're already collecting EBT SNAP, food bank groceries, free breakfast/lunch/groceries at school, free vaccines, free emergency care via UMC, free local housing vouchers, free LIHEA utilities--which generated free Food Stamps for the ENTIRE HOUSEHOLD. 25 million already adopted and our welfare systems are bankrupt. More "Americans" on food stamps that ever.

  4. July 15th AMERICAN Blacks and Latinos to march on D.C. AGAINST more amnesty, against any form of letting them stay. Illegals HAVE TO LEAVE. Blacks and others want to find work, of any kind, rather than illegals staying in the 7 million jobs stolen from us.

  5. Gary, it would appear HR THINKS we like the sound of his voice. All this posturing so he can inflame his rhetoric during the mid-term elections and pretend again that AMERICANS are concerned about a safety net and amnesty for invaders. HR thinks that would help get his guys elected. How off target can he get?