Las Vegas Sun

August 23, 2014

Currently: 78° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Medical marijuana bill in danger in the Assembly

A bill legalizing medical marijuana dispensaries in Nevada could be in danger.

An Assembly Republican leader said today nearly all of their members are disinclined to support the bill, meaning Democrats would not be able to meet the two-thirds requirement to pass the measure.

“I certainly wouldn’t vote for anything that would enhance the availability of marijuana,” said Assemblyman Randy Kirner, R-Reno, the caucus policy director.

Senate Bill 374, which had its first Assembly committee hearing today, would allow medical marijuana patients to buy their medicine at dispensaries meant to be like pharmacies.

The bill’s sponsor, however, said it seems like the Assembly is poised to pass the bill.

“I didn’t hear any opposition that was significant,” said Sen. Tick Segerblom, D-Las Vegas.

Democrats need at least one or two Republicans to join them to pass the bill.

While Gov. Brian Sandoval earlier said he’d veto a separate bill legalizing the recreational use of medical marijuana, he said he’s open-minded about the dispensary bill.

The dispensary bill passed the Senate with unanimous Democratic support and a favorable vote from six of 10 Republicans in the Senate.

The bill needs to pass the Nevada Assembly with a two-thirds majority by Monday, the last day of the legislative session, and requires the approval of the governor.

Segerblom has worked with law enforcement, medical marijuana patients, local governments and his Republican colleagues in the Senate to fashion the 40-page bill, which essentially outlines the regulatory framework of a new type of business.

He has had no greater ally than Sen. Mark Hutchison, R-Las Vegas, a conservative Republican who opposed the original votes in 1998 and 2000 to put the right to medical marijuana in the state constitution but supports upholding the state’s constitutional mandate for the Legislature to “provide by law for authorization of appropriate methods for supply of the plant to patients authorized to use it.”

He said he supports the bill because it is the “absolute opposite of the California system.”

“This will not be the Dr. Feelgood hanging out in a Jerry Garcia smoking lounge with a giant pot flag hanging outside the door,” he said.

Incidentally, Segerblom has a large flag with an image of a marijuana leaf hanging in his office, indicating that the bill has support from both conservatives and liberals in the Legislature.

The bill also has support from the executive director of the state Republican Party.

“This is important to a lot of our seniors,” said Michael McDonald, who said that while the party has not taken a position on this bill, he is at the Legislature to personally support it.

The chairman of the Assembly Judiciary committee that heard the bill this morning did not say whether it was likely to pass, noting he hasn’t counted the votes yet.

But he did indicate that there was limited opposition.

“It went fine,” said Assemblyman Jason Frierson, D-Las Vegas.

The bill originates from a number of court cases in which judges and law enforcement officials have noted that the current law regulating medical marijuana is unclear and does not provide a reasonable means by which patients can acquire their medicine.

The proposal has morphed numerous times since its introduction several months ago as Segerblom and Hutchison have amended it to address concerns.

The most current amendment says that the dispensaries must be 1,500 feet from schools, churches, parks, day cares, playgrounds, public swimming pools and recreational centers. They also must be located in industrial or commercial zones.

Local governments would have the right to ban dispensaries if they choose.

“That’s a very solid legal and political principle, and that is the government closest to the people governs best,” Hutchison said.

When licensing dispensaries, counties would be restricted to hosting no more than 40 dispensaries or a number equitable to 10 percent of licensed pharmacies in a county, whichever is greater.

The bill also lays out application, registration, and renewal fees for cultivation and production facilities, independent laboratories, and storefront dispensaries. Owners would need to pass a lengthy application process with the state’s Department of Health and Human Services.

The final sale of the product would be subject to sales tax, and the state would levy a 2 percent excise tax on the sale, production and growth of medical marijuana.

Fees for applying for a medical marijuana card would be cut in half under the amendment.

In addressing concerns that the dispensaries would be unsavory or detrimental to communities, Hutchison said there’s a provision in the bill that would address those concerns.

In the bill, the dispensaries must “have an appearance, both as to the interior and exterior, that is professional, orderly, dignified and consistent with the traditional style of pharmacies and medical offices” and “have discreet and professional signage that is consistent with the traditional style of signage for pharmacies and medical offices.”

A commission working in conjunction with the Department of Health and Human Services would work to develop regulations governing dispensaries. They’d finish their work by April 1, 2014, and Segerblom said the first dispensaries could open by the end of 2014 or early 2015.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 3 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. /"I certainly wouldn't vote for anything that would enhance the availability of marijuana," said Assemblyman Randy Kirner, R-Reno../

    The fear from Kirner and his colleagues is that marijuana may reduce the sales of liquor and pharmaceutical-prescription drugs. Notice that the medical industry does not mention supplements that work if a prescription is not needed.

    For instance, they will prescribe Ibuprofen for osteoarthritis but never mention taking glucosamine chondroitin, this from personal experience.

    After three years of taking pain killers from doctors, I tried glucosamine for osteoarthritis and the stiffness began to disappear the next day. Within a week there was a world of difference. Glucosamine is well known, very reasonably priced and not a hidden supplement.

    Unfortunately, the American medical is a FOR PROFIT industry. It is designed to maximize profit and pay bigger dividends to it's owners and shareholders every year. The stockholders end up getting more consideration than the patients, and they never run out of patients.

    Medical marijuana is much safer then many pain medicines while offering phenomenal results at lower costs, but it doesn't require a pharmaceutical company for manufacturing.

    As a result of the profit motive, the industry can afford to lobby the Randy Kirners to work more for the wealthy and the privileged then the public. That's what the discussion is really about - emptying the savings accounts of the public before they can retire or give it to their children.

  2. "An Assembly Republican leader said today nearly all of their members are disinclined to support the bill. . ."

    Doughman -- you should have done your homework. In both the '98 and '00 elections We the people amended our Constitution with an instruction to the legislature to make marijuana available for medicinal purposes. You can see that @ http://www.leg.state.nv.us/const/nvconst...

    SunJon -- your quote from Kirner is extremely disturbing. Have a look @ http://www.leg.state.nv.us/const/nvconst...

    If our state officials don't honor their oaths of office, why do We the people allow them to stay in office? Welcome to the herd.

    "Tobacco, hemp, flax and cotton, are staple commodities." -- from Thomas Jefferson "The Works," vol. 3 (Notes on Virginia I, Correspondence 1780-1782), "A Notice Of The Mines And Other Subterraneous Riches; Its Trees, Plants, Fruits, &C."

  3. It's astonishing that in the second decade of the 21st century...

    there are still those that would deny pain relief to those in dire need...like Cancer patients or Glaucoma sufferers, for example.

    "My moral standards far outweigh your pitiable need to have pain relief!"

    The 'I, Me, Mine!' of Republicanism never ceases to amaze.

    "An Assembly Republican leader said today nearly all of their members are disinclined to support the bill"...

    NOT ONE of these 'conservatives' will break from party affiliation to do the right thing? The absolute 'will of the people'?

    Pathetic. Morally reprehensible.

    "Let's bury this thing and go celebrate! Thick, juicy steaks and bottomless Martinis! Which one of you drug lobbyists are buying?"

    "Say, bring along a few of those 'sample packs', wouldja? I've got a little um, Bursitis going on over here."

    Sickening.