Las Vegas Sun

July 31, 2014

Currently: 89° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Legislature 2013:

Last-minute budget negotiations become contentious in final legislative days

Sun Archives

Negotiations over Gov. Brian Sandoval’s $6.5 billion proposed budget entered into their final frenzied hours Friday as lawmakers rushed to put their own mark on the state’s two-year spending plan before the session officially adjourns Monday.

Democratic leaders have largely given up on most of their early priorities, namely $300 million in additional education funding, which would have required a significant tax increase.

That’s left them scrambling for a way to fund smaller priorities—chief among them the elimination of a 2.5 percent salary cut for state workers.

But even coming up with the $51 million to do that has proven to be a battle, as Gov. Brian Sandoval worked to eke out one last concession from Democrats—passage of his $5 million proposal to give tax credits to businesses who contribute to a scholarship program that low-income families could use to send their children to private school.

That’s a nonstarter for Democrats, who see it as a step toward a voucher program.

Republican sources said Sandoval is willing to reconsider his proposal to expand the exemption from the state payroll tax if Democrats would support his “opportunity scholarship.”

Foregoing that proposed tax cut would free up $25 million, enough to close the gap remaining on what Democrats want to do for state worker salaries.

Instead, of taking Sandoval up on the offer, however, Democrats have been combing the budget for areas from which they can divert funding.

“If he wanted to, he could just put that money toward education,” Sen. Debbie Smith, D-Sparks, chairwoman of the Senate Finance Committee, said of the tax cut. “If you don’t do a tax cut, you could do more for education. You could reduce more class sizes.”

But Smith acknowledged Democrats don’t have the votes to reject Sandoval’s tax cut outright. That would need a two-thirds majority to pass, requiring three Senate Republicans and one Assembly Republicans to join with the majority party.

Republicans in the Legislature are in lockstep with Sandoval and would vote against any attempt to eliminate the tax cut without movement on the governor’s other priorities.

“They would need to have two-thirds to get it out of there and I doubt that it would have that type of support,” Sandoval said Friday when asked if he would veto a budget that came over without the tax cut.

Because he has managed to keep Republican lawmakers unified, Sandoval has seen his budget go largely unchanged by Democrats, which puts him in a powerful bargaining position in the final days of session.

“The governor’s gotten everything else he wanted,” one Republican source said. “If they want more, they have to give on something big.”

But after a somewhat contentious Senate Finance Committee meeting, in which the panel endorsed a move to retain six furlough days of state workers but eliminate their salary cut, Smith indicated both sides are largely done with the arguing over the big-money items.

“Everyone has their personal priorities and ideas for how we spend the money we have,” she said. “We are left with extraordinarily difficult decisions.”

In addition to putting the finishing touches on the education budget, lawmakers still must decide whether to scrimp together about $6 million to help rural colleges weather a loss in funding resulting from a change in the way the state divvies up its higher education dollars.

Sen. Pete Goicoechea, R-Eureka, said this week he is prepared to vote against the budget if that money is not found.

In addition to the budget, lawmakers have three days to resolve some major policy issues. They include:

• A bill by Speaker Marilyn Kirkpatrick, D-North Las Vegas, to close loopholes in the live entertainment tax. Kirkpatrick backed down from her effort to tax all admissions and recreational activities, introducing a drastically paired down bill on Friday. It’s uncertain whether she’ll get enough support to pass the slimmer version.

• A bill that would require private party background checks on gun purchases. This has become the most political issue of the final days, with the national group Mayors Against Illegal Guns launching a concerted effort to see the bill passed. Sandoval has promised to veto the measure if it passes the Assembly.

• A measure that would stop the sales tax from applying to free meals casinos give their employees and patrons. The bill is part of an agreement to settle a $233 million lawsuit brought by the casinos.

• NV Energy’s measure that would require the utility to stop using coal to produce electricity and build natural gas and renewable energy plants instead is still winding its way through the Assembly. That measure is tied to negotiations on a cadre of renewable energy bills that have yet to be settled.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 3 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Voucher proposals are routinely portrayed as a way to give low-income Blacks and Latinos the same chance as middle-class whites to choose a private school. Yet influential voucher proponents in Nevada have made no secret of their goal to institute vouchers for all children.

    Just as it has in every state that has implemented income limited voucher programs the dissatisfaction of proponents with income limits is going to become very acute. However, experts have argued that based on statistical research those benefiting most by an expanded voucher program would be white, wealthy families who probably would have attended private schools anyway.

  2. Part 1 of 2 They need to EXTEND this Nevada State Legislative Session or call a Special Session, to hammer out efficiently and effectively all the issues remaining on the Lawmakers' table! Clearly, the battle now is partisan, and is toxic towards any productive results, sad to say. The 77th Session opened with such great promise, only to fizzle and revert back to feral politic between 2 parties. Shame Shame Shame

    Commenter Sebring Frehner has a valid point. Even with a voucher, parents are responsible for transportation to/from school and for extra-curricular events for their child in private school. Also, there are strict rules that the student and their parents/families must adhere to for the student to stay at a private school. They will be compelled to do the work, not sass school staff, and participate in most all school activities, including fundraisers, bees, athletics, etc. (and pay for that too). I can attest to this, having taught at a private school, besides teaching in public schools.

    Taxpayer backed, public schools cannot pick and choose who they enroll, and end up with some of the most expensive students to service (Special Ed, ELL, Behavioral problem students come to mind here). That is why having Teach for America recruits may not be the best choices for at-risk elementary schools, but may be a better fit at middle and school levels.

    Peace,
    Star

  3. Part 2 of 2
    Citizens are given the "sugar-coated" version of Teach for America, as the national statistics in recent news stories reflect statistics of only those TFA members with success stories and excludes the negative press of those who drop out early, or have issues with the organization. If you are curious for a honest, balanced account, read accounts from all sides, hosted by a former TFA recruiter, Gary Rubenstein on these links, for not only him, but many others who are still in TFA, former recruits, etc.:

    Teach for America's former teacher speaks out on: shedlightnow.blogspot.com/2013/05/repost-from-teach-for-ushighlights
    and http://garyrubenstein.teachforus.org/201...

    What are they hiding? They are asking for TAXPAYER backing to the tune of $2 million here in Nevada, $1.5 million in Texas, and other states. WHY? Their financial records are not too transparent. They are supported by the likes of Students First Michelle Rhea (an educational consultant to Governor Sandoval), as well as others in high ranking positions in Carson City, who have the Governor's ears. Dismantling public education and implementing vouchers is their agenda.

    Their mission is clear: Destroying the lifetime of seasoned, dedicated professional careers of educators all along the way. Those who planned and focused on being great teachers are being marginalized and targeted with this agenda. All the while innocent children are the guinea pigs for the TFA teachers to learn on. Parents are NOT notified about the qualifications of these teachers, especially at the at-risk schools. How would YOU feel if YOUR child had a TFA teacher and that was not disclosed?

    Please don't misinterpret my comments: all the TFA teachers I have personally met and/or worked with over the years are wonderful young people with lots of enthusiasm and energy. Sadly, I have also witnessed the majority of them leaving the teaching profession and/or Nevada as well. Teaching children was not their life's goal. That is NOT a positive return on Taxpayer dollar investment.

    Mistake in Part 1, should be "...at middle and HIGH school levels." Thank you.

    Blessings and Peace,
    Star