Las Vegas Sun

December 22, 2014

Currently: 48° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Las Vegas government gets low marks on transparency

Image

Leila Navidi

Mayor Carolyn Goodman delivers the State of the City address at Las Vegas City Hall on Thursday, January 10, 2013.

The city of Las Vegas received low grades for its transparency when it comes to posting details of its spending online, according to a new study released Wednesday by the United States Public Interest Research Group Education Fund.

The nonprofit group awarded Las Vegas a “D” grade for its transparency, ranking the city 20th out of the 30 largest cities in the country, three spots below Los Angeles and one spot below Phoenix.

The report evaluated cities based on how easily public records, like expenditures, vendor contracts and tax subsidies, can be found online.

Las Vegas provides basic budget documents such as its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report to the public through its website, but fails to provide “check book” level accounting that provides information on individual budget items, the report found.

To improve, U.S. PIRG suggests implementing a central site online where residents can go to find public records. It further suggests that line-item budget expenditures, vendor contracts and tax subsidies over multiple years be compiled into a searchable and downloadable database for the public to use.

“Las Vegas provides limited online access to government expenditure information beyond basic budget documents and lags behind many other major U.S. cities when it comes to comprehensive spending transparency,” Erin Larkin, Western States Field Organizer for the nonprofit group, said in a statement. “The ability to see how government spends its funds is fundamental to democracy. Transparency in government spending checks corruption, bolsters public confidence, improves responsiveness, and promotes greater effectiveness and fiscal responsibility,” said Larkin.

Two cities, Chicago and New York City, received A grades in the study, while San Francisco received an A-minus.

Five cities received failing grades for transparency, including Atlanta, St. Louis, Detroit, Cleveland and Sacramento.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 4 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Local government was never intended to create career employment for so many. Great salaries. Great benefits. Great pensions. No one gets fired.

    And you say our government is not transparent? Really?

  2. So much for the transparency sales job to the public from the City Manager and her public relations department that occurs on a DAILY basis.
    I wonder what spin the city PR department will put on this report to try and discredit it?
    Plain and simple, the City of Las Vegas citizens do not know the truth nor can they find it even if they tried.
    Good luck on finding any financial information, period.

  3. truthserum: Just saw the new GOP Chair, Clark County, on Sam Shad's--she (we) would like to eliminate the problem of illegal immigrants by ENDING FREE K-12 and free health care.