Las Vegas Sun

March 27, 2015

Currently: 87° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Nevada lawmakers hold policy hearings in private

Updated Friday, Feb. 15, 2013 | 12:33 p.m.

In a glaring example of how much of the public’s business gets heard in private, Democratic lawmakers met behind closed doors with lobbyists from both sides of the construction defect debate on Thursday night, receiving briefings on what could be a key policy issue in final negotiations affecting taxes and funding of the state budget.

Trial lawyers met with Senate Democrats first, while a construction lobbyist met with Assembly Democrats. After about half an hour, the lobbyists switched sides.

The meetings were described by participants as general policy briefings by lobbyists, where lawmakers - many new to the issue - could ask questions. Construction industry representatives circulated a copy of a bill passed by the Democratically controlled Senate in 2009, which will be the base for the Republican push this session.

Generally, such briefings are held in public meetings with posted dates, times and locations so the public can participate.

In a brief interview, Speaker Marilyn Kirkpatrick, D-North Las Vegas, would not explain why the policy briefing wasn’t done in a traditional public hearing.

Senate Majority Leader Mo Denis, D-Las Vegas, said caucuses getting briefed by lobbyists was not unusual. “It’s to make sure, before committee hearings, members are somewhat familiar with a topic,” he said. “Members can ask questions they may not feel comfortable asking - it’s an information thing.”

The construction industry and Republicans have made reforming the system for handling complaints about residential construction defects a priority for the past four years. They argue the system is rigged as an automatic windfall for trial attorneys.

Advocates for the current system argue that the system works fine to protect homeowners living in faulty housing.

But while private meetings between lawmakers and lobbyists are common, de facto hearings with full membership of the caucuses are unusual. Democrats make up majorities in both the Assembly and Senate, but the Legislature exempts itself from the open meeting law Other government agencies in the state are required to meet in public when there’s a majority of members.

The private meetings were first reported by the Nevada Appeal.

Kirkpatrick also interrupted a contentious Assembly committee hearing on Secretary of State Ross Miller’s bill affecting public campaign reporting and disclosure laws so that Democrats could gather for their secret meeting.

Assemblyman James Ohrenschall, D-Las Vegas, paused the hearing around 5 p.m. and resumed a little after 6 p.m. to briefly say that the committee would reconvene next Thursday to continue the hearing on Miller’s bill.

Kirkpatrick, in a quick interview Friday morning, said the meeting was just educational.

"We were just getting some information."

Why not have a public hearing?

"Everybody in the building did it yesterday," she said, referring to a similar private meeting Republicans had with construction industry lobbyists.

Assembly Minority Leader Pat Hickey, R-Reno, said that earlier this week his caucus met with construction advocates. He said the trial attorney side did not request a meeting.

Senate Republicans have said that construction defect reform, which passed the Democratically controlled Senate in 2009 but died in the Assembly, is a top priority this session. It could be a condition for reform of the state’s tax structure.

But changes to the system in Nevada for resolving construction defects in houses have been largely opposed by the trial attorneys, a core constituency for many Democratic lawmakers.

A study released Thursday from UNLV’s Center for Business and Economic Research detailed the state of the housing market and noted obstacles to recovery in the housing market, including an excess supply of houses and the current construction defects law.

The study says lawsuits against builders have “skyrocketed” while homes sales have plummeted. The study also says the lawsuits and subsequent settlements have driven up insurance premiums, increasing home prices for consumers.

Revising the law would aid Nevada’s economic recovery, the study says.

It was prepared for the Southern Nevada Homebuilder’s Association.

Construction industry lobbyists spent Thursday shopping the UNLV study around to lawmakers in an effort to help build their case. The study essentially says the construction defect laws “cost jobs, drain economy and harm homeowners.”

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 2 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. The statistics presented by UNLV's Center for Business and Economic Research are fascinating but they ignore one critical question: were there, in fact defects that needed to be rectified?

  2. Just add me to the list of victims of homes with construction defects who got the run-around for years by an organization that since closed its office here in Nevada. It is the homebuyers as myself, who are left holding the bag when the "here today, gone tomorrow" housing people have blown town.

    Where's the justice for the little guy Citizen?

    Blessings and Peace,