Las Vegas Sun

July 30, 2014

Currently: 92° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

OTHER VOICES:

Why the GOP should support immigration reform

Another view?

View more of the Las Vegas Sun's opinion section:

Editorials - the Sun's viewpoint.

Columnists - local and syndicated writers.

Letters to the editor - readers' views.

Have your own opinion? Write a letter to the editor.

Considering the difficulties facing any immigration-reform proposal, last week’s opening moves were encouraging.

A bipartisan group of eight senators released an outline of basic principles: tougher border security, a guest-worker program, a path to legal status for the 11 million undocumented workers now in the country.

President Barack Obama followed with a statement generally in line with those ideas — with the notable omission of a guest-worker program.

The problem Obama faces on that score is opposition from organized labor. Recall that when Obama was a senator, he helped torpedo a guest-worker provision in the unsuccessful reform bill pushed by then-President George W. Bush.

Both parties are divided on this issue, but Republicans more so than Democrats. It is far from clear enough GOP votes can be rounded up for comprehensive reform, especially in the House.

A key factor in the coming weeks will be Obama’s role. So far, he’s avoided wading into specifics, allowing the eight senators to proceed — a welcome sign he may be more interested in getting a bill passed than in acquiring an issue to use against the GOP.

Still to be determined: whether Obama — and the Democrats — will press for a too-easy path to legal status for undocumented workers, which would eviscerate GOP support, and whether Obama can agree to a guest-worker program despite labor’s opposition.

A guest-worker policy is an important element, one that recognizes that immigrants are essential in many seasonal industries such as agriculture. Without such a program, many immigrants feel compelled to settle and stay, knowing that if they go home when the work is done — as many did under the “Bracero” guest-worker program ended in the 1960s — they may be unable to return to the U.S.

The Republican presidential primary debates, with their loose talk of electrified fences and policies encouraging immigrants to “self-deport,” contributed to a psychologically crushing election defeat in November. Many Hispanics — and Asians — saw the GOP as thoroughly anti-immigrant.

Republican support for immigration reform won’t guarantee more Hispanic votes, but outright resistance would harden attitudes among such voters for years.

But Republicans shouldn’t back reform solely for political reasons. They should support it because it’s solidly in the national interest.

While too-rapid immigration can cause real problems, over the long term it is an undeniable benefit. The immigrant contribution in high-tech has been spectacular: Google, eBay and Intel were founded by immigrants or their children. Immigrants started more than half of Silicon Valley tech firms, according to a 2009 Kauffman Foundation study.

Meanwhile, the landscape has shifted dramatically since the unsuccessful reform effort of 2007. Last spring, a Pew report concluded that migration from Mexico had hit net zero and “may have reversed.”

“We have turned the page in terms of migration,” Roberto Suro of the University of Southern California told The Wall Street Journal. “We haven’t turned the page yet in terms of the policies.”

The need for successful reform is especially timely, in light of the sudden drop in U.S. fertility after the credit-market panic in ’08. This could be either a temporary blip or an ominous portent.

With the Baby Boom generation retiring, demographic decline threatens slower growth, a heavier tax burden for a shrinking workforce — and a nation more inward-looking. As Harvard’s Joseph Nye recently noted, immigration reform “will be an important step in preventing the decline of American power.”

Many experts worry that America will be eclipsed by a rising China. Nye quotes Singapore’s former leader Lee Kwan Yew for the rebuttal: It won’t happen because America draws the world’s best and brightest and grants them the freedom to pursue their dreams.

Here’s hoping the fragile bipartisan effort in Washington succeeds in enacting a good reform bill.

E. Thomas McClanahan is a member of the Kansas City Star editorial board.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 1 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Columnist's article is misdirected. The Democrats and Speaker Harry Reid, not the GOP, killed the immigration reform bill in the Senate in 2005-2007. Then Senator Barack Obama cast the deciding vote to water down/scrub the Guest Worker Program of the bill. When he did, the other Senators pulled their support of the bill and it died in the Senate. Why did Senator Obama vote to essentially eliminate the Guest Worker Program? Simple. The AFL-CIO, Trumka, Big Labor was against it, and still. Fearing the influx of immigrants would erode the union rank and file. Note that President Obama did not address the Guest Worker Progarm in his immigration speech in Nevada and in his White House paper on the principles of immigration reform. Fortunately, although silent on the matter, Obama is in his second term. He doesn't have to worry about Trumka and labor's support for reelection. But Democrats do!

    CarmineD