Las Vegas Sun

April 24, 2014

Currently: 75° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

OTHER VOICES:

Family breakdown goes biracial

Another view?

View more of the Las Vegas Sun's opinion section:

Editorials - the Sun's viewpoint.

Columnists - local and syndicated writers.

Letters to the editor - readers' views.

Have your own opinion? Write a letter to the editor.

I know from past experience that I’m going to upset some folks by saying this, so brace yourselves: Marriage is very important and beneficial to the raising of children, but there’s little evidence that it fights crime.

I bring this up in response to the sincere, well-meaning readers who say that we won’t be able to do anything — anything — about urban violence until we reverse the decline of marriage in black households.

I’m as troubled as any other concerned black parent about the rise in out-of-wedlock births in black America since the 1950s. But I am even more troubled when I hear people who should know better try to lay every social problem, including the nation’s current gun violence debate, at the feet of single-parenting — as if nothing else mattered.

Heather Mac Donald, a writer and analyst at the conservative Manhattan Institute, helped set this tone in a widely circulated 2010 essay in City Magazine on black-on-black violence in the Chicago neighborhood where Obama famously worked for four years as a community organizer.

Her conclusion: Obama and “decades of failed social policy” in crime-plagued low-income neighborhoods on the city’s far South Side “ignored the primary cause of their escalating dysfunction: the disappearance of the black two-parent family.”

For those who read down far enough, she does mention that Obama is aware of the problem. She quotes his call for cultural change in a widely covered Father’s Day speech in Chicago during his 2008 campaign.

“If we are honest with ourselves, we’ll admit that ... too many fathers (are) missing from too many lives and too many homes,” he said then. “We know the statistics — that children who grow up without a father are five times more likely to live in poverty and commit crime; nine times more likely to drop out of school and 20 times more likely to end up in prison.”

That’s the speech, you may recall, that upset the Rev. Jesse Jackson as too condescending, although most black voters didn’t seem to mind.

Mac Donald wants more than that. She dismissed Obama’s “bromides about school spending, preschool programs, visiting nurses, global warming, sexism, racial division and income inequality.” Such spending will be wasted, she said, until poor black Chicagoans curb unwed pregnancies and stop the “culture of illegitimacy.”

I believe quite the opposite, that we can’t expect to see much of a turnaround in out-of-wedlock births as long as we have rising educational and income inequality — and not just in black America.

A variety of sociologists and economists from the ideological left, right and nonpartisan middle have found downward mobility to be a shared experience across racial lines for many working-class and middle-class Americans, especially since the Great Recession.

As a headline on an article by Isabel Sawhill, a family life expert at the Brookings Institution, in the latest Washington Monthly put it: “Family Breakdown Is Now Biracial.”

Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s controversial 1965 report, titled “The Negro Family: The Case for National Action,” she writes, “looks remarkably similar to a profile of the average white family today,” with the sharpest declines in marriage rates occurring among the least educated of both races.

Marriage, in a sense, has become a new symbol of status, especially for the college educated. “The group for whom marriage has largely disappeared now includes not just unskilled blacks but unskilled whites as well,” she writes.

If the rise in out-of-wedlock births was tied that closely to crime and violence, I think we would see a more consistent pattern connecting them. Instead, we see crime going sharply up and down in various cities and across the country, while the rise in unwed childrearing steadily climbs.

A development this huge calls for more than simple one-size-fits-all analysis. I’m not saying government programs provide all the answers, but we’re only beginning to ask the right questions.

Clarence Page is a columnist for the Chicago Tribune. He writes from Washington.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 3 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Mr. Page is wrong. The breakdown in the two parent family in whites and blacks has increased exponentially over the last 50 years. With the lack of a father in the home, the single mother is more likley to suffer severe economic deprivation and live in poverty. Sure the government provides needed support as it should. But the broken families and fatherless children in these living conditions suffer a moral cost as well as financial cost for years and years. Resulting in many of the crimes and overcrowded prisons we have today.

    CarmineD

  2. The real "breakdown" in the USA, has its roots in our educational system, and in tandem, job opportunities. Family support of education is pivotal as to the lifelong success a child will have.

    "I believe quite the opposite, that we can't expect to see much of a turnaround in out-of-wedlock births as long as we have rising educational and income inequality -- and not just in black America." Exactly!

    It has little to nothing to do with the color of our skins nor the kinds of parents (hetero/homo-sexual; nor of religious slant). What DOES matter is the SUPPORT a child has throughout their formative years in their schooling and for the duration of their lives. You train up a child in the way they shall go, and ultimately, they shall not depart from it.

    As I listened to the PBS Charlie Rose Show,where he was interviewing Hispanic Associate Supreme Court Judge Sonya Sotomayer, she voiced that the difference in her life was the focus on the importance of education in her home by her parents and family. EDUCATION is a social equalizer. Having employment opportunities is the partner of education as a social equalizer.

    We all bleed red, but what makes us different from one another is the "...content of our character," what we do based on what we know is right and experience.

    Blessings and Peace,
    Star

  3. Using education as a reason for the moral breakdown and decay of society is like wetting the bed. At first it feels good but after a while it's a mess. If a two parent family is not present and actively involved in the educational success of their offspring, the children are likely to fall behind in shool and fail. Obviously if a single mother is working full time to provide food and shelter, the childrens' academic achievement suffers. Once that happens, crime and prison are the outcome.

    CarmineD