Las Vegas Sun

December 17, 2014

Currently: 53° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Metro Police board urges firing of officer involved in shooting

A Metro Police officer who shot a man in the leg last year should be terminated, the department’s Use of Force Board has recommended.

Officer Jacquar Roston was relieved of duty with pay last week pending a pre-termination board hearing, where a ruling will be made, Metro officials said.

The incident in question happened Nov. 11 while Roston was responding to a domestic violence call in the eastern valley. A woman called 911 to report that her ex-boyfriend had beaten her and damaged her vehicle, police said.

When police arrived, the woman exited the vehicle and her ex-boyfriend remained inside. As Roston was speaking to the ex-boyfriend, he shot the man in the leg, police said. The man suffered injuries not considered life threatening.

Roston apparently mistook a hat with a metallic sticker as a weapon when the man reached under the seat and grabbed the clothing item, said Chris Collins, executive director of the Las Vegas Police Protective Association.

Collins said Roston was acting on a perceived threat — and thus defending himself and others — when he fired at the man. As such, the union believes the officer-involved shooting falls in line with Nevada law, he said.

“We do not believe any evidence was presented that would warrant termination,” Collins said, adding that he was surprised by the board’s decision.

Metro officials would not comment about the board’s rationale for seeking termination. The Use of Force Board is a mix of residents and department personnel.

“That would be something very inappropriate to discuss,” Metro spokesman Bill Cassell said.

Roston, 36 at the time of the shooting, has worked for Metro since April 2009. He was assigned to the patrol division of the Southeast Area Command.

Metro officials said this is the first time the board has recommended termination, although Collins said an officer was terminated several years ago for shooting at a vehicle on the Las Vegas Strip.

Collins expects the pre-termination board hearing to occur within 60 days. Police said it would be a closed-door hearing.

Until then, the police union plans to review documents related to the incident, Collins said.

“We will build our case to defend the actions of Officer Roston,” he said.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 2 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. I wonder how much justification there is here, versus Metro making an example out of one officer as a show of "good faith" towards the community.

    Still though, giving officers carte blanche to shoot whomever they like is quite dangerous. Chris Collins was quoted in other media outlets as saying in regards to the "perceived threat" defense aspect:

    "If Metropolitan officers are no longer going to use that standard, we're going to bury a lot of cops,"

    At the same time, if bad cops are going to cowardly hide behind that same standard, we're going to continue to bury a lot of civilians.

  2. Chris Collins, executive director of the Las Vegas Police Protective Association, said Roston was acting on a perceived threat -- and thus defending himself and others.

    Wow! These people really have no integrity. Don't they see how supporting such criminal conduct tarnishes the good officers on the streets?

    You have all these other officers who risk their lives on the line every day - who show restraint and professionalism in doing their job correctly without allowing their emotions to blur their professional judgment.

    Then you have some trigger happy untrained tool - shoot someone b/c of a hat - and he is supported?

    Supporting this guy only damages the professionalism that other officers provide.

    Just look at the comments on the site - so many people speak out against officer shootings - precisely because of people like this guy supporting these kinds of grossly negligent, if not criminal, incidents.