Las Vegas Sun

October 1, 2014

Currently: 69° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Adelson butts heads with opposing attorney in Day 2 of testimony

Image

Julie Jacobson / AP

Las Vegas Sands Corp. CEO Sheldon Adelson testifies for a second day in Clark County district court, Friday, April 5, 2013, in Las Vegas. Attorneys for Hong Kong businessman Richard Suen say Sands owes him $328 million because he worked behind the scenes to help the company win a gambling license in the Chinese enclave of Macau.

Updated Friday, April 5, 2013 | 6:40 p.m.

Sheldon Adelson In Court: Friday, April 5, 2013

Las Vegas Sands Corp. CEO Sheldon Adelson testifies for a second day in Clark County district court, Friday, April 5, 2013, in Las Vegas. Attorneys for Hong Kong businessman Richard Suen say Sands owes him $328 million because he worked behind the scenes to help the company win a gambling license in the Chinese enclave of Macau. Launch slideshow »

His second day on the stand, the casino king left most of his jokes at home.

In his second day of testimony Friday, Sheldon Adelson sparred with the attorney of Hong Kong businessman Richard Suen, who says Las Vegas Sands owes him $328 million for helping the company secure a gaming license in Macau.

But Adelson, the chairman and CEO of the Las Vegas Sands Corp., has argued it was his company's reputation that paved the path to his Chinese casino empire.

On his first day of testimony, the 79-year-old mogul came armed with an arsenal of quips as he explained Sands' launch in Macau in 2001.

On Friday, he slowly entered the court room, using a marble-handled cane, his demeanor changed.

He was reluctant to answer many questions from Suen's attorney, John O'Malley, claiming he had already answered many of them.

The sparring began when Adelson began taking notes behind the stand and O'Malley demanded to know why.

Judge Robert Bare told Adelson, while it's not prohibited, that he needed to first ask permission to write notes, because the action is obtrusive to O'Malley's questioning.

Adelson agreed — then joked that Judge Bare had something in common with his wife, Miriam.

“Oh my god,” Adelson quipped. "I get her at nighttime and daytime."

Time and time again, O'Malley presented Adelson letters from correspondence between Suen and Las Vegas Sands.

And time and time again, Adelson, reported as the ninth richest man in the United States, denied authorizing the correspondence.

Several letters — which Adelson claimed came from the desk of former Sands COO William Weidner — detailed a business pitch to Suen.

The offer included a success fee of $5 million and 2 percent of casino profits if Sands built a casino in Macau.

But Adelson claims he never authorized the offer.

The multibillionaire cited treacherous dealings with a rare nerve illness in the early 2000s, claiming he only participated in about “50 percent” of the company's business discussions.

Adelson said he trusted his cohorts to make decisions for him, often signing his name and editing correspondence in his absence.

“I can't tell you now whether or not I saw this letter,” Adelson said, responding to one of the letters detailing the deal. “(If) I did, I wouldn't have approved.”

Suen's lawyers contend his relationships with officials in China helped Adelson's company get that deal.

But Adelson argued that if he had agreed to offer Suen a success fee, the businessman would have had to secure a gaming license for Sands before seeing a penny of the cash.

Bottom line, Adelson said: Sands never received a gaming license in Macau.

Sands eventually entered Macau as a sub-concessioner with Galaxy Entertainment, which technically holds the gaming licenses.

O'Malley focused heavily on deposition video produced the last time Adelson took the stand in 2008.

It's the second time Adelson has explained the company's entry into Macau in Clark County court. In 2008, a jury ruled in Suen's favor, awarding him more than $40 million.

In 2010, the Nevada Supreme Court overturned the verdict, citing the district judge's allowance of hearsay statements in the courtroom.

This time around, O'Malley pitted Adelson against himself, peppering the mogul with questions and then turning the jury's eyes to video clips, which sometimes showed Adelson answering differently.

While he kept most of his sly humor tucked away, Adelson didn't shy from snapping at Suen and his cohorts.

At one point in his testimony, Adelson interrupted O'Malley in the middle of a question, pointing out a smirk on Suen's face.

Adelson then pointed out Steve Jacobs, a former Sands executive sitting in the audience, and complained he, too, had been smirking all day. Adelson called the gesture “disruptive.”

But the questioning carried on, Adelson persistently denying Suen's involvement in the Sands' success in Macau.

When O'Malley finished questioning, the mood of the courtroom changed.

Adelson turned to his best subject: himself.

Under cross-examination by his attorney, the casino king spent the rest of the afternoon sharing the narrative of his poor-boy roots. Adelson said his life has trotted parallel to the famous “rags-to-riches” storyline.

“Except my parents couldn't afford the rags,” Adelson said, causing a wave of chuckles to roll across the room.

O'Malley objected to Adelson's storytelling and requested more direct questions from his attorneys.

But Adelson continued, describing his ascent from a lowly court reporter transcribing trials to the man who brought the convention business to Las Vegas.

“I'm a frustrated lawyer, not to mention a frustrated singer,” Adelson said, causing more laughter. “I used to sing.”

Adelson is slated to return to the stand at 9 a.m. Monday for the remainder of his testimony.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 3 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Anyone that believes that Mr. Adelson has not done anything for Las Vegas lives in a cave.

    Look around town, do a Google search. The man has given millions to support this town along with employing Thousand of people.

  2. Anyone who believes that Mr. Adelson has not taken a huge profit out of Las Vegas must live under a rock inside a cave.

    Look around town and do a Google search. The man may have given millions but he has received billions back and he is not doing it out of the good feelings in his heart.

  3. Mr. Finney.

    Bottom line he is in business, business that he built with this money.

    He does not have to give you anything. You don't know his reasons for giving anything, you don't know him.