Las Vegas Sun

August 27, 2014

Currently: 94° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Case of ‘none’ voting option sparks judicial spat

In a rare case of public judicial infighting, federal District Judge Robert C. Jones of Reno says he resents the personal attack on him by an appeals court judge.

Jones issued an order cancelling a Sept. 14 hearing on further motions on the suit seeking to stop the "none of these candidates" voting option from appearing on the Nevada election ballot.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the ruling of Judge Jones, who decided that the "none" option should not appear on the ballot for president.

Circuit Judge Stephen Reinhardt wrote a concurring opinion, slamming the handling of the case by Jones.

Jones, in his order Wednesday, complained the attack by Reinhardt questioned his "personal integrity and motivation." And he said the accusation is false that he personally delayed a decision to prevent an appeal to the 9th Circuit.

Jones was appointed by Republican President George Bush and Reinhardt was chosen by Democratic President Jimmy Carter.

Jones accused Reinhardt of "inappropriate judicial activity" in contacting his office asking for an early entry of a preliminary ruling.

Judge Jones ruled the "none" option should be off the ballot as sought by Republican leaders who feel that in the close presidential contest, the dissatisfied voter would choose Mitt Romney over President Barack Obama.

He refused to stay his order so the state could appeal to the 9th Circuit Court. But the Senior Deputy Attorney General Kevin Benson filed an emergency order, and the appeals court ruled that "none" should stay on the ballot.

Judge Reinhardt accused Jones of "dilatory tactics" to prevent the state from appealing the decision before the Friday deadline to proof and print the election ballots.

Reinhardt said Jones not only delayed his decision but would have deprived the citizens of their right to take part in the presidential election. "Such arrogance and assumption of power by one individual is not acceptable in our judicial system."

Rarely do judges get in a personal battle in official court documents.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 2 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. some people are so full of themselves. and some of those just don't have enough work to do that they must interfere in the public's business.

  2. "In a rare case of public judicial infighting, federal District Judge Robert C. Jones of Reno says he resents the personal attack on him by an appeals court judge."

    Ryan -- thanx with extra cheese for the peek under this judge's robes! Anyone can download the case @ http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/content/view...

    Reading Reinhardt's concurring opinion -- "The district judge's intent to evade appellate review is plain from the record." -- I see it is well-reasoned, well-said, and clearly shows Jones' partisanship. He should be charged and tried for obstruction of justice!

    Despite Jones' years on the bench, and having a guaranteed job for life, he's been outed as being just another corrupt and well-paid bully. Accountability by appellate reversal is part of their business, and our local judges who can't accept that lack the temperament for the job. Far too many sitting judges treat their assigned courtrooms as their personal kingdoms.

    "some people are so full of themselves."

    flyinglow -- judges more than most. After all judges anywhere can sign anything with no real consequences to themselves. Unless they unravel someone's life to the point their victim has nothing left to lose.

    "The legal system has also been wounded by lawyers who themselves no longer respect the rule of law ..... When lawyers cannot be trusted to observe the fair processes essential to maintaining the rule of law, how can we expect the public to respect the process?" -- the Honorable Edith Jones to Harvard's Federalist Club "American Legal System Is Corrupt Beyond Recognition, Judge Tells Harvard Law School" 2/28/03