Las Vegas Sun

October 21, 2014

Currently: 76° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Line of Attack: Mitt Romney ad has hits and misses in the message

Nothing's Free

Line of Attack is a weekly feature in which we parse a political attack, looking at the strategy behind it, how the campaign is delivering it and what facts support or refute it. We’ll assign it a rating on the fairness meter: Legit, Eye Roll, Guffaw, Laughable or Outrageous.

Attack: “Obamacare” will cost the little guy. It raids $716 billion from Medicare, taxes wheelchairs and pacemakers, and raises taxes on families making less than $120,000.

Method of Delivery: “Nothing’s Free” is the latest television ad from Mitt Romney, the now-official Republican candidate for president. Fresh on the heels of the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Fla., it directly attacks Obama’s biggest legislative achievement.

Strategy: The Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare if you prefer, gave Republicans a big attack target. But pounding the president for wanting to require individuals to have health insurance is problematic because when he was governor of Massachusetts, Romney signed legislation that included an individual health insurance mandate.

So this ad digs down into other specifics of Obamacare and its purported costs on seniors, the disabled and those making less than $120,000.

Fairness Meter: To dig into the details of the ad, it’s important to understand that the Affordable Care Act has to at least be cost-neutral to the federal government. Providing insurance to a lot more people requires combinations of cost savings (or cuts) and tax increases.

The ad claims the Affordable Care Act is “raiding” $716 billion from Medicare. That number, which you’ve been hearing a lot about recently, comes from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, in a letter to Republican Speaker John Boehner.

Those Medicare cuts would come from reductions in payments to hospitals and insurance companies and the elimination of a premium Medicare insurance plan. Democrats argue that the cost savings will reflect the cutting of waste as opposed to outright cuts.

They also note, more relevantly, that Rep. Paul Ryan, the vice presidential nominee, makes similar cuts in his own budget proposal. So while that number is based in fact, we say this Republican attack makes our eyes roll.

Next, there’s the claim that the budget will tax wheelchairs and pacemakers. There is, indeed, a 2.3 percent tax on medical devices to help pay the costs of the Affordable Care Act, raising an estimated $29 billion over 10 years. The tax won’t directly be on consumers’ purchases for individual use but rather on device manufacturers. While its effect on consumers is disputed by Democrats, there is indeed a tax on these devices that wasn’t there before. So that attack is Legit.

The last claim is that Obamacare raises taxes on families making less than $120,000. Indeed, some individuals may have to pay a tax penalty for not having health insurance. And the Romney campaign points to a Congressional Budget Office document that says 76 percent of those paying the penalty for not having health insurance will make less than $120,000 a year — about 3 million people. But for the ad to claim “raising taxes on families making less than $120,000” implies a much broader hit than that. The claim is Laughable.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 7 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Even the strongest supporters of Obamacare should be concerned about the potential disaster looming on the horizon.

    See "Obamacare may make a bad situation worse" at
    Relevant Matters - http://wp.me/pv0gT-by

    Excerpt:

    The Journal of the American Medical Association warned us 12 years ago:

    "America's healthcare system is the third leading cause of death in the U.S., causing between 230,000 and 284,000 fatalities per year, behind only heart disease and cancer."

    The report didn't say the third leading cause of death is poor health. It said the healthcare system itself. In other words, our country's third leading cause of death is the legions of good-intentioned doctors, nurses, and others whose ultimate duty is to help us avoid death.

    JAMA provides a breakdown of the deaths caused by healthcare:

    - 12,000 deaths per year due to unnecessary surgery
    - 7,000 deaths per year due to medication errors in hospitals
    - 20,000 deaths per year due to other errors in hospitals
    - 80,000 deaths per year due to infections in hospitals
    - 106,000 deaths per year due to negative effects of drugs

  2. Interesting points, MaleMatters, and thankfully, the Affordable Care Act also has provisions for provider accountability and better coordination of care. These factors should help reduce the costs of healthcare for everyone. Seems like a winning situation to me.

  3. True, the Affordable Care Act imposes a penalty on insurance companies who spend more than 15% of insurance premiums on administration cost. Actually the penalty is a reimbursement or a refund given back to the policy holders. This provision is currently being enforced.

    The problem with the overall message by Romney and Ryan is, it's difficult to have a meaningful debate when their message is full of distortions and misleading statements.

  4. If you haven't seen the movie '2016' out in theaters now, I strongly, strongly urge you to see it and to spread the word.

    If that movie doesn't wake up the American people, nothing will.

  5. Teamster - I again, strongly encourage you to see '2016' in the theater.

    It may surprise you and make you re-think your 'greedy' comment.

  6. One thing we all know for sure, all the stops are being pulled to not re-elect President Obama. We see it in the outright lies being told coming directly from the Republican candidates, Romney and Ryan. We see and hear the relentless add on TV and online. Now, a clearly distorted movie from a producer who never talked to the President has pieced together distorted view of the President.

    I tell you, if your a voter who relies on opinion news, talking head, extreme talk radio, distorted unverified movies to decide who to vote for, your using your vote irresponsibly.

    The true test of an responsible adult on making important decision---you must ask yourself, would you want your children to make an important decision using facts and doing homework on the issues, or would you want your children to decide on important issues by relies on distortions, misinformation, and misleading statements?

    Voters do your homework. Lies are Lies, Facts are Facts. On that point if anyone thinks 2 + 2 = 4 is not a true statement, everything you are doing in life needs re-examination.

  7. @kepi,

    Great advice!