Las Vegas Sun

February 27, 2015

Currently: 63° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account


Sandy teaches a lesson

Another view?

View more of the Las Vegas Sun's opinion section:

Editorials - the Sun's viewpoint.

Columnists - local and syndicated writers.

Letters to the editor - readers' views.

Have your own opinion? Write a letter to the editor.

Back when he was being “severely conservative,” Mitt Romney suggested that responsibility for disaster relief should be taken from the big, bad federal government and given to the states, or perhaps even privatized. Sandy would like to know if he’d care to reconsider.

The absurd — and dangerous — policy prescription came in a GOP primary debate in June. Moderator John King said he had recently visited communities affected by severe weather and noted that the Federal Emergency Management Agency “is about to run out of money.”

“There are some people ... who say, you know, maybe we’re learning a lesson here that the states should take on more of this role,” King said. “How do you deal with something like that?”

Romney replied: “Absolutely. Every time you have an occasion to take something from the federal government and send it back to the states, that’s the right direction. And if you can go further and send it back to the private sector, that’s even better.”

Romney went on to express the general principle that, given the crushing national debt, “we should take all of what we’re doing at the federal level and say, ‘What are the things we’re doing that we don’t have to do?’”

King gave him a chance to back off: “Including disaster relief, though?”

Romney didn’t blink. “We cannot — we cannot afford to do those things without jeopardizing the future for our kids,” he said, adding that “it is simply immoral ... to rack up larger and larger debts and pass them on to our kids.”

Now that an unprecedented and monstrous storm has bashed the East Coast, this glib exercise in ideological purity is newly relevant. Was Romney really saying that the federal government should abdicate the task of responding to natural disasters such as the one now taking place? Yes, he was. Did he really mean it? Well, with Romney, that’s always another question.

As the legendary Watergate source Deep Throat never actually said: “Follow the money.”

The dishonest “solution” proposed by Romney and running mate Paul Ryan for the federal government’s budget woes relies largely on a shell game: Transfer unfunded liabilities to the states.

Most disastrously, this is what Romney and Ryan propose for Medicaid, the health care program for the poor. The GOP plan would give the states block grants that would not begin to cover Medicaid’s rising costs. Governors and legislatures would be forced to impose draconian cuts, with potentially catastrophic impact for millions of Americans. Medicaid’s most expensive role — and thus, under Romney, the most imperiled — is to fund nursing home care for seniors who classify as “poor” only because they have exhausted their life savings.

Transferring the onus of Medicaid and other programs to the states would save money only by making it impossible to provide services at current levels. For the hard-right ideologues who control the Republican Party, this would be a good thing. Our society has become too dependent on government, they believe, too “entitled” to benefits; we are unwilling to “take personal responsibility and care for” our lives, as Romney said in his secretly recorded “47 percent” speech.

Romney’s budget proposals would end all this coddling — except for the Pentagon and its contractors, who would get a big boost in federal largess, and of course the wealthy, who would get a huge tax cut.

So-called “discretionary” federal spending would be sharply reduced. This would include spending for such agencies as FEMA. So yes, even if Romney was just pandering to the right-wing base at that June debate, one consequence of his policies would be to squeeze funding for federal emergency relief.

I guess having to survive a few hurricanes, tornados and earthquakes on our own would certainly foster personal responsibility.

And by the way, why is it that we’re having such a huge hurricane make landfall in such an unusual place at such a late date in the season? Is this another of those freakish once-in-a-century weather events that seem to be happening so often these days?

I know it’s impossible to definitively blame any one storm on human-induced atmospheric warming. But I’m sorry, these off-the-charts phenomena are becoming awfully commonplace. By the time scientists definitively establish what’s happening, it will be too late.

As has been noted, the words “climate change” were not spoken during the presidential debates. It was an omission we should sorely regret.

Eugene Robinson is a columnist for the Washington Post.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 7 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. "Romney didn't blink. "We cannot -- we cannot afford to do those things without jeopardizing the future for our kids," he said, adding that "it is simply immoral ... to rack up larger and larger debts and pass them on to our kids."

    Sure! Instead, let the kids grow up in devastated neighborhood. They'll thank you for it. :-)

  2. "Sure! Instead, let the kids grow up in devastated neighborhood."

    I did. Newark New Jersey. Born and raised. Graduated from Rutgers University in Newark. I didn't do too badly for my humble beginnings. What makes you think they [others like me] won't.


  3. "What makes you think they [others like me] won't."

    The ones that didn't do as well.

  4. "The ones that didn't do as well."

    Only because they made the wrong choices. Not the fault and blame of the government but theirs. It's called "free will."


  5. How quickly Democrats forget about Katrina and the FEMA F*up there.

    It is better to do disaster relief at the local level. It just makes more logical sense. Locals know the area better, they will be first responders, and they can move resources where they are needed better. Nationalized disaster relief in such a large country is just silly.

  6. Here is a counterpoint on the subject from WSJ:

  7. And FEMA is actually trying to learn from companies like WalMart and Home Depot who analyze their data about storm buying patterns and when there are storms coming to an area they stock accordingly. had an interesting article on that and how government sometimes gets in the way of helping people in those situations.