Las Vegas Sun

January 27, 2015

Currently: 52° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account


Violence Against Women Act in limbo as parties weigh consequences of provision affecting important constituency: Hispanics

Senate Democrats are taking their Memorial Day break this week with a piece of aggravatingly unresolved business: how to respond to House Republicans’ objections to their Violence Against Women act, which passed with a healthy bipartisan majority weeks ago.

The objections are procedural. But the source of frustration is political.

And it stands the chance of pitting two of the most important swing blocs in the Democrats’ base — women and Hispanics — against each other.

House Republicans based their sharp objections on a single provision in the legislation that would fund counseling, shelter and court programs to counteract violence against women. They don’t like the set-aside of up to 10,000 visas for undocumented immigrant women who are victims of domestic violence.

The Constitution is on the Republicans’ side in this one. All bills that propose new sources of revenue — such as the fee attached to the visa program — have to start in the House. And while the House oftentimes does the Senate a solid and gives them a piece of dummy legislation to keep things moving, this time, they’re digging in.

The easiest way forward would be to simply excise the domestic violence visa from the bill, Democrats acknowledged. The Senate Republicans who supported the bill despite their unease with the visa provision wouldn’t object.

Click to enlarge photo

Harry Reid, U.S. Senator (D-NV).

“Of course the way to do it would be to eliminate the provision dealing with immigration there,” Sen. Harry Reid told reporters last week. “I think the majority of my caucus doesn’t want to do that.”

Is the Violence Against Women Act an immigration bill? No, not in the slightest, absent this provision.

But that doesn’t change the fact that Democrats are worried about any perceived slights to the Hispanic community. Although Hispanics rarely rank immigration as their top issue, Democrats have used it to curry loyal support from the constituency.

Most Democrats have backed efforts to extend residency permits, visas and pathways to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. Most Republicans have championed a more enforcement-centric platform — and Latinos have recalled those records come election-time.

Republicans wouldn’t mind changing that trend and have set their sights on wooing the Latino vote toward the right in 2012.

Would Democrats lose their Hispanic base if they end up cutting loose undocumented domestic violence victims to save the rest of the Violence Against Women act bill? Highly unlikely, especially considering the alternative. Republicans aren’t exactly offering undocumented domestic violence victims an olive branch to resolve the matter.

But in a season when political stakes are so high and races so close, nobody wants a bad headline — especially since in the next five months Democrats won’t get many opportunities to pass pro-immigrant legislation.

There is another option though: Do nothing.

Much as the Violence Against Women Act is due for a reauthorization — and it would make a nice feather in the caps of lawmakers trying to woo women voters — it’s been running past its expiration date since last year.

Humming along without an authorization can be troublesome when it comes to budgeting time. But Congress also won’t pass a budget before the election. That means the programs supported by the VAWA can coast along for a little while longer on the back of a continuing resolution.

It’s not a perfect solution, but it does make the worst-case scenario not quite so bad.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 7 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Unfortunately, the most important politics of all -- the lack of any budget -- is ignored in Washington while they posture for identity votes. Good writing, Karoun, to sum up the article with the true outrage of this situation.

  2. Pander to criminal invaders is the democrat way. I thought that violence against anyone was already against the law in every state? Why do we need the FBI involved in local matters?

  3. Could Congress focus on violence within the U.S.? How about removing the illegal invaders doing crime for cash--to pay their rent? We don't want their abused women. We have enough amuse women, many of whom have intense and endless issues.

  4. RHG58,

    Welcome to my purgatory. Yes, azsk8fan and many of his or her ilk are serious. It is nearly impossible to persuade the illogical & ignorant amongst us.


  5. By all means, TeaNuts...

    Vote early, vote often on the 'anti-women' legislations currently en vogue with your representatives in Washington, D.C.!

    Muchas Gracias!

    President Barack Obama

  6. Pandering to minority voters is noting new. The Democrats have made a living doing it. The most unfortunate part is the lack of genuine concern as compared with buying votes.

  7. Commenter Kathleen Worthington says it in a nutshell, "Unfortunately, the most important politics of all -- the lack of any budget -- is ignored in Washington while they posture for identity votes." To believe that anyone believes this is quality legislation on immigration policy, as pointed out with, "especially since in the next five months Democrats won't get many opportunities to pass pro-immigrant legislation," is a very sad commentary on the lawmakers we have entrusted our country to.

    Clearly, the Violence Against Women Act should NOT include any form of illegal amnesty. Our country already provides a path to LEGAL citizenship that they should avail themselves to (as have many of our own family members had). For any political party to pander for votes in such a manner simply discredits and tarnishes their reputation.

    Americans can back the VAWA withOUT the rider of including free passes to illegal victims. Surely there are benevolent sponsors to assist illegal victims obtaining citizenship the proper manner, without sticking it to the taxpayers.

    Blessings and Peace,