Las Vegas Sun

February 28, 2015

Currently: 61° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Some of Nevada’s youngest citizens hurt by budget cuts


Leila Navidi

Vinil Narayan, 2, who is autistic, plays on the swing while learning communication with his mother Shika Narayan during a session with Jennifer Murdock, a developmental specialist with Easter Seals Nevada, outside his home in Henderson on Friday, March 16, 2012.

Early Intervention

Vinil Narayan, 2, who is autistic, plays on the swing while learning communication with his mother Shika Narayan during a session with Jennifer Murdock, a developmental specialist with Easter Seals Nevada, outside his home in Henderson on Friday, March 16, 2012. Launch slideshow »

A 1-year-old with Down syndrome had his every-other-week physical therapy cut in half after the state told his parents there wasn’t money for more frequent sessions.

The state would not pay for a 2-year-old with speech and cognitive disabilities to see therapists more than twice a month. Again officials cited the battered state budget.

A 2-year-old with Down syndrome had her sign language lessons and occupational and physical therapy appointments reduced by half. And instead of being seen at home, her parents take her to a clinic.

These cases and others, detailed in a complaint against the state, triggered an internal state investigation last month. Together they reveal a troubling fact about the impact of Nevada’s austere budget: Services to the state’s youngest children are being curtailed and sometimes not provided at all because of a lack of funds.

About 250 children, from newborns to 3-year-olds, are on waiting lists for such services. For the 2,447 children who are in the state’s program, plans for therapy are often limited, the investigation found. The complaint was brought by the Nevada Disability Advocacy and Law Center.

Among the findings:

• In 76 percent of the cases reviewed, the state did not provide all of the services called for in plans agreed to by state caseworkers and families. This was “due to a lack of available personnel resources” and reduced hours the state had to contract with therapists.

• In 52 percent of cases, the state did not initiate services within 30 days, as required by the federal government. This was “attributable to the lack of personnel resources as a result of the reduction in the amount of funds available for contract services.”

• And on July 1, the state required most children in the program be seen in a clinical setting instead of their home. This shift, approved by the state Legislature to save about $1 million a year, also violates federal law.


The Nevada Early Intervention Services program serves children with development delays, those who, for example, have trouble feeding themselves and speaking. Among those served by the program are children with autism and genetic disorders such as Down syndrome.

The federal government requires states to provide such services. Studies have shown that children’s brains are rapidly developing during these early years and therapy and treatment can have the greatest impact.

Beyond the obvious humanitarian reasons, there’s a fiscal one, as well: Children who receive such services in early years need fewer services from schools and social programs as they grow and develop, and in some cases don’t need any at all.

In Nevada, however, the immediate needs of the recession on the state budget have overshadowed long-term planning.

State officials said the reduction in services, from the summer through the fall, was temporary. Children who weren’t provided with services are now being offered additional services to help make up for the therapy sessions missed, said Mary Liveratti, deputy director with the Department of Health and Human Services.

But Liveratti and other state officials acknowledge that the state’s ability to provide services must fall within a dollar amount set by the governor and Legislature.

“The level of services we can provide is confined by the budget,” said Mary Wherry, deputy for clinical services at the Nevada State Health Division.

That has meant fewer children receive more services, or more children have fewer services.

“It’s a fine line,” Wherry said. “Staff would never be told how many services (a child gets) are based on budget reality.” But, she said, “they know we have limited dollars in the budget.”


The consequences of decisions made in Carson City are rarely noticed by most Nevadans. But for parents of the children who rely on state services to improve their lives, the budget constraints are a real part of their everyday lives.

David, a 15-month-old born with a chromosomal deletion, had been making “amazing progress” with the help of state services, said his mother, Jessica Bischopink of Reno.

“He was sitting up, scooching on his stomach, beginning to crawl — things he would not naturally know how to do,” she said.

This summer, a state worker informed her that his weekly physical therapy sessions would be cut in half.

“I was scared, scared of what would happen to David if he missed the therapies,” she said. “It was a resource that I was counting on, and they were not there for me anymore.”

Through Medicaid, which David is enrolled in, and the family’s private insurance, she counts herself lucky that she was able to fill in the gaps left by the state’s reduction.

In November, the state had restored the cut services and promised to make up for the seven physical therapy sessions he had missed.

But other parents Bischopink knows haven’t been as fortunate, losing services during a critical time when their children’s brains are rapidly developing.


In 2007, the state budgeted $20 million a year for early intervention services. State policymakers have avoided dramatic cuts to the program as the governor and Legislature have gone through rounds budget cuts. As a result, the waiting list has dropped.

Gov. Brian Sandoval and lawmakers in both parties have talked about the importance of early childhood education. But the reality is that the Nevada Early Intervention Services’ budget was cut by $1 million last year, to $25.7 million.

Since 2009, the state’s program had been propped up by $4.9 million from the federal stimulus and a federal grant. But that money has run out.

To save money, the state Legislature in 2011 approved dropping in-home services.

But federal law and regulation require that services be provided “in the natural environment of the child and family,” according to the investigation, which was conducted by the state’s Individuals with Disabilities Education Act office.

Liveratti said the program is still evaluating its procedures. She noted that some group settings, like day care centers, could be used to provide services more efficiently.

Lynne Bigley, an attorney with the Nevada Disability Advocacy and Law Center, met with state officials this month.

“I think everyone acknowledges problems,” she said. “I think they’re committed to address problems in early intervention services.”

She said the agency has agreed to provide information about corrective actions called for in the investigation.

“I left that meeting feeling very encouraged. A lot of attention is going to be given to this issue,” she said, before adding, “a lot of this often boils down to money.”

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 5 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. It is truly tragic that the State is not investing in doing today what will curtail the need for services tomorrow by cutting therapy services.

    These affected children and their families are getting a double whammy when having to face, yet, another adversity and hinderance in realizing progress and investing in the future success of that child.

    The reality: "Since 2009, the state's program had been propped up by $4.9 million from the federal stimulus and a federal grant. But that money has run out.

    To save money, the state Legislature in 2011 approved dropping in-home services.

    But federal law and regulation require that services be provided "in the natural environment of the child and family," according to the investigation, which was conducted by the state's Individuals with Disabilities Education Act office."

    From my own experience, when those extra services can't be afforded, one must take on greater responsibility. Since the State has to cut the Budget, and EVERYONE in this state must do their part, why not think "out-of-the-box" and pick up the slack in therapy services with the use of technology and parental involvement?

    Parents will have to commit to doing the missed therapy session themselves with their affected child/ren. Sure, it adds an extra hour or so to their load, but its for the benefit of keeping their child progressively moving and on-track. The technology they can use are specific videos, live chat with a therapist online, integrate support groups, and even self-help books for guidance. They work continuing what the State Therapist did until the next visit.

    Solely relying on the government to provide everything is bad thinking. Currently, our national, state, and local governments are in an economic ICU, hanging on by a thread. We have to be MORE responsible for our own lives, survive without being overly dependent upon governmental assistance.

    Blessings and Peace,

  2. Waiting on the state to do anything is like trying to hit megabucks from your house. The state cannot do what communities can do, why try and make it? It will only come out screwed up.

    Community is where this comes from, sadly we need to find it all over again. It's there sleeping.

    And yes parents must do the therapies and the training - they are best suited for it anyway and it in reality is an exercise in patience and love.

  3. It's easy to object as a matter of principle to any attempt to increase government revenue. I wish Grover Norquist and his followers could spend a few days caring for disabled kids so that could see that their dogma has real world consequences. These families are, in effect, the ones subsidizing tax breaks for the wealthy by having to suffer with fewer desparately needed services that they had every right to expect.

    The fact that our short sightedness will increase long-term costs only makes this situation more tragic.

  4. Here in Corrupt Illinois, next year's budget also has cuts in funding for inhome services, from seniors down to chilren such as those in this article. The MOST vulnerable in our society are getting shafted with these budget cuts in EVERY State. But the rich always seem to come out okay.

    I agree that the parents must do their part at home but who says they don't? Caring for anyone disabled is a 24/7 job regardless if they go to therapy outside of the home. It's a tough job.

    My home care agency I work for is unionized - the SEIU. A few weeks ago about 1500 of us marched on Springfield protesting these budget cuts, not only because our jobs are definitely affected, but for those we care for (seniors, the disabled and the children). At the rally inside the Capital building, many brought their "clients" with them and they spoke on how important these in-home services are. One brave soul stood up and said if the State cuts the in-home services, many seniors will end up in nursing homes as wards of the State, which in the end will cost the State even MORE money (did the State not think of that??). The union was successful last year for the 2012 budget, so hopefully we will be again successful. These politicians forget: it's election year so they best listen to us!!

    Star, you mention that solely relying on the government to provide everything, on paper, sounds great but don't forget, MANY people cannot afford the care, even part of the care, they deserve and that's why they rely on Medicaid. One therapy session costs over $100+ (depending on what kind of therapy). How can families afford that? In the case cited in the story, the one child has had his sessions cut in half. NOW the parents will have to pick up the slack at home and it is a very demanding job, especially if the parents work.

    And you would think other family members would get involved and help out. Guess what? That is not the case. I see it in my job all the time. One lady I cared for had FOUR daughters living within 15 minutes from her house. Only ONE daughter made the effort to check in with her Mom more than once a week. Everyone is too busy living their lives to bother. I find it appalling. But then, I was raised differently and my sister and I and my nieces and nephews bent over backwards when my parents were alive to help out. But a family like ours is far and few between.

    It's an uphill battle across this whole country. So many are going to fall thru the cracks.

  5. For Det_Munch-Thankfully, we both were raised to care for our family members and be compassionate. And, having had a blended family in a previous marriage, I know all too well what it is like to care for a vulnerable child 24/7. Hospices were few and far between, only developing back then. We all should do our part to bring comfort and end the suffering around us.

    But there are support groups, some found within the community, some within church groups, or charities, and if possible, one should avail themselves for that extra help. It is less than a perfect world, you are right about that! I applaud your efforts in elightening your lawmakers in Illinois, my prayers for those who do state budgets have mercy and show compassion towards the less fortunate as they are supposed to be representing EVERYONE.

    Blessings and Peace,