Las Vegas Sun

January 31, 2015

Currently: 61° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Why Steve Wynn’s plan for Foxborough casino has been so divisive

Town board blocks casino, but many Patriots fans would welcome it


Karoun Demirjian

Mark Sullivan, a Foxborough town selectman, in his garage with his son Seamus, explains how the standoff over the casino is ripping his town apart, as he laments that the drama is bound to drag on at least another six months.


Cecelia and Frank Colella walk along a street in Foxborough. The 50-year residents say introducing a casino will destroy the character of their town. Launch slideshow »
Click to enlarge photo

New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft, right, hosts casino mogul Steve Wynn and his wife, Andrea Hissom, on the field at Gillette Stadium prior to the Patriots' NFL football game against the Indianapolis Colts in Foxborough, Mass., Sunday, Dec. 4, 2011.

FOXBOROUGH, Mass. — Las Vegas casino mogul Steve Wynn has exported his gaming know-how to the Jersey Shore and the South China Sea. But those successes don’t seem to matter much to the residents of this sleepy enclave of 17,000 who are wary Wynn might turn their stretch of country highway into the Bay State Strip.

“It’s going to change the whole town,” said Cecelia Colella, 74, who has lived in Foxborough for 50 years. “We absolutely do not need this ... not in our backyard.”

The town is the site of Wynn’s latest plan to build a destination casino, conference center and resort. The location he’s chosen is directly opposite Gillette Stadium, home of the NFL’s New England Patriots, on the town’s outskirts. Massachusetts legalized casino gaming late last year.

Patriots owner Robert Kraft, who owns the land and would lease it to Wynn for a reported $1 billion, has joined Wynn to push the proposal. Both stress the casino would fit within the existing stadium and shopping area.

But for town residents that setting is a source of concern.

Once a week, 10 weeks a year, the town more than quadruples in size when the Patriots host home games, as football fans crowd Route 1 with their cars, grills and cases of beer.

It’s a taste of the hordes that would-be developers hope would also come for a casino.

Click to enlarge photo

The front entrance of Gillette Stadium, home of the New England Patriots, in Foxborough.

At first blush, it’s not a bad bet: Among the throngs who came to watch the Patriots trounce the Buffalo Bills in the regular season-ender New Year’s Day, it was hard to find anyone opposed to the idea.

“It would be the all-around package: Come to a tailgate, go to a football game, and after the football game, after a great win, go gamble at the casino and have a hot streak at the blackjack tables,” said Donna Coleman of Sandown, N.H., who was grilling with her husband, Calvin, outside the stadium before the game; the couple have season tickets. “I think more people would come with us, say people who didn’t have tickets. They would be more apt to tailgate with us; then we’d go to the game and they’d go off to the casino.”

“I think it’s great for the people in this area,” said Brianne O’Meara, a tailgater and self-professed blackjack fan from Easthampton, Mass., a town that neighbors another proposed casino site in the western part of Massachusetts. “The locals are worried about the traffic ... but they need to accept change.”

“I’ve been to Steve Wynn’s casino out in Vegas ... it’s going to be done really well. I don’t think the town has anything to worry about,” said Mark Densmore of Gardner, a town in central Massachusetts, who also attended the Patriots game on Sunday. “The (residents) have learned to live with (football games) ... so they could learn to live with the casino.”

But that’s what local residents are afraid of.

“We have to plan our day out when they have a home game ... even to get out of the driveway,” said Nancy Whitney, who grew up in Foxborough.

But her main concerns are the other kinds of traffic that she said could come to town on the heels of a casino, such as crime, drugs, and prostitution.

“This New Year’s Eve, I was at Mohegan Sun, and we came back horrified by all the undesirable people and activity ... I just thought, ‘oh my goodness, this is going to be in our town,’ ” Whitney said. “I’m not opposed to gambling. I just do not want it in my back yard.”

It’s Connecticut casinos Mohegan Sun (which sponsors one of the biggest billboards outside Gillette Stadium) and Foxwoods — not Las Vegas — that are the standard everyone here compares a potential Massachusetts casino to, whether they fear the clientele a casino might attract, or have hopes for the revenues they might claim.

The giant casinos are to some a desirable destination and to others an eyesore on an otherwise bleak stretch of highway in a state most Massachusetts residents would only otherwise visit en route to New York.

Either way, it’s not what Wynn is planning.

“You have to look at the total project,” said Board of Selectmen Chairman Larry Harrington, as he described the rough sketches of Wynn’s idea: glass windows incorporating Foxborough’s wooded landscape as part of the scene, family-friendly areas and a casino so recessed into the structure as to be completely avoidable by anyone who didn’t want to see it.

Click to enlarge photo

Larry Harrington, chairman of Foxborough's board of selectmen, sits at his kitchen table and explains why he thinks the Kraft-Wynn casino proposal deserves to be heard out by the town residents and why the tax revenue it would bring would be a boost to the town.

A letter Wynn recently sent to Foxborough residents said it would be “a resort destination with the character of Foxborough at its heart.”

Harrington, a Raytheon executive when he’s not running town business, was in the minority when Foxborough’s five-member board of selectmen voted 3-to-2 last week to send Kraft and Wynn a nonbinding “thanks but no thanks” letter, signaling the town isn’t interested in the proposal.

Hundreds of residents crowded a high school auditorium to voice their objections to the project. But Harrington wonders if they’re not drowning out thousands more residents in town who might want to hear things out.

There are about 11,000 voters in the town, but only about 2,000 have made their opinions, for or against the casino, known.

Harrington has a strong pitch to make to the undecideds: Not only would casino owners cover the added police and public service costs that such a project would bring, but it would bring jobs and tax revenue — enough to pay off the town’s $100 million debt and reduce property taxes for residents by 25 percent on day one.

“Foxborough’s a small town ... people here are taxed to the max already,” Harrington said. “Seniors and young families especially, they could use the help.”

But Foxborough, while it hasn’t been immune to the recession, isn’t suffering like Las Vegas. Median income and median home values in the town are well above state averages, which are well above national averages; and many town residents are concerned that the introduction of a casino will do more to damage that status than it will boost their economic well-being.

“It’s going to bring down property values, and bring an influx of low-wage jobs,” said Kirstin Stone, a mother of four who just moved to Foxborough. Had they known about the seriousness of the casino proposal, Stone said, they would have crossed Foxborough off their list of potential places to live — and plan to look for a way out if the casino is approved for construction.

“It changes the feeling of our town, and you can’t put a price tag on that,” she said.

Neither is everyone convinced by the jobs argument.

When it legalized casino gambling, Massachusetts approved the construction of three regular casinos, and one racino — a racetrack also offering slot machines. Plainville, down Route 1, has expressed an interest in the racino, while Suffolk Downs, a horse racing track within Boston city limits, is angling for the casino that Wynn and Kraft are trying to site at Foxborough.

“No matter if this is built in South Boston or Foxborough, those jobs are going to be there,” said Mark Sullivan, a selectman who started out the month of December in favor of hearing Wynn’s proposal but changed his mind when the board voted it down.

Sullivan, who owns a small construction company, said he even went to Kraft asking him to withdraw the proposal because it was “tearing (the) town apart.” Kraft had said early on that he would not stuff a project into Foxborough that the townspeople didn’t approve of; but according to Sullivan, wanted to hear from more town residents before considering a change of mind.

Click to enlarge photo

Douglas and Nancy Whitney and their dog, Zoey, at the kitchen table in their house, which is on a bypass road in Foxborough. They vehemently oppose construction of a casino -- he for moral reasons, she because of the crime, drugs, prostitution and traffic she believes it will bring to the town.

Kraft and Wynn were supposed to appear at a meeting with Foxborough residents on Jan. 10. That has been scrapped since town selectmen voted against a casino, and since no written, detailed proposal for the site exists yet. The earliest date the town could organize a wider referendum on the question is May.

“Once it’s here ... we have no control over what happens,” Sullivan said, explaining that even if the casino helped Foxborough assume the costs of running the establishment, the town would have to relinquish oversight and control of the area to the state gaming commission for the duration of the lease: 75 years. “We’re not the only town fighting this. We’re just the most popular town because we have one of 32 NFL franchises in the country.”

That anchor of an NFL team is doubtless a major incentive to Kraft and Wynn, who has said he wants the casino and resort complex to draw customers from across the country and globe.

“Who sits in Europe and says, ‘Hey, for our vacation, I’m going to go to Foxborough’? ” asked Doug Whitney, husband of Nancy, who described himself as “morally opposed” to a casino.

The unlikeliness of Foxborough becoming a destination resort like Wynn’s properties in Las Vegas may be the one point on which both opponents and proponents of the project agree.

“It would never turn into Las Vegas. It’s impossible,” said Todd Alperin, a Patriots fan from New Hampshire who was in favor of constructing the casino. “(In Massachusetts) we just got to buy beer on Sundays a few years ago. So I don’t think you have to worry about that.”

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 11 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Sad to see progress halted because of fears that could've easily been settled with proper planning. I've been to a small town like Green Bay, Wisconsin where they have an NFL team and a casino and you'd never even guess they had a casino, unless you knew about it beforehand. Other municipalities have opened casinos in the midwest and the aforementioned crime and traffic gridlock didn't materialize. Also, the economy improves because of the jobs that casinos generate and from what I've seen, they aren't low paying at all. The infusion of tax revenue is also a boon to most of these cities as well. Too bad they let their fears take advantage of them.

  2. Wynn and Bob Kraft, the Patriot's owner, made an early, key and disastrous decision that effectively killed their proposal before it could gather momentum: they didn't tell anyone about their plans until they leaked the story to The Boston Globe. And no one residing in a leafy, close-knit, suburban community south of Boston likes waking up to a story that a $1 billion casino may be built just over their backyard fence.

    Had the billionaire duo been part of the process for the past 2-3 years, holding local meetings, discussing mitigation initiatives, working with local business and community groups to solicit their input, the political blowback might have been tempered. But Kraft and Wynn didn't deign to talk to the little people, assuming that the locals would eat up their pie-in-the-sky promises of jobs and revenues. They didn't!
    And this is why political and media consultants LOVE outcomes like Foxboro. Because it shows what happens when business execs think they know how to do politics. They don't!

  3. Those who think there are no prostitutes and /or druggies at Wynn, Encore, or Bellagio do not know where to look.

  4. Think traffic is bad now. Wait til you have both game and casinon traffic simultaneously.

  5. Lots of high class hookers at Wynncore. Doesn't even take a genius to find them.

  6. Has Wynn ever been benevolent to Las Vegas? Why expect him to be anywhere? Write enough regulation to make sure he flosses his teeth correctly and then tax him at 40 to 50 percent. His jobs are mostly service sector and are a drag on the community.
    The ONLY person ever getting rich is a Casino is the Owner, everyone else looses, its a transfer of wealth up the food chain.

  7. The people of Foxborough who don't want old Stevie in town are spot on. All he cares about is the amount of money he can drain from any area. He recently said that his company is a "Chinese" corporation with locations in the USA and plans to move his headquarters there -- what a patriot! He's committed to Communist China.

    Also, if gaming is such a wonderful economic boost to a city, why the hell is Las Vegas considered Ground Zero in the economic collapse? Because gaming only makes the owners, the top execs, and the bribed politicians rich that's why. They abandon any responsibility to the upkeep of the city, county, or state. They pay little in taxes, own the politicians, and the corruption is in full view. (Everyone brags about their old or current affiliations with the mob or mob mentality still at work here, personified by the former Mayor and the torch still carried by his wife, the new Mayor!)

    The casino moguls, politicians, et al, do whatever they can to dumb down the populace (worst educational system in the country) to keep their slave labor in tow and in full supply.

    Foxborough residents are not backwards - they are smarter than the average Las Vegan, and want to protect themselves from the dressed up scummy showboys like stevie trying to sell them a bill of goods that will line HIS pockets with dollar bills and to hell with the rest of you. I applaud you Foxborough residents and watch out for the bribed politicians that will railroad legislation to take your town away and give it to the likes of stevie.

    Go to China, stevie.

  8. I admire the Wynn Resorts and all that Steve has accomplished over the years, but transplanted did hit the nail squarely on the head.

  9. Apparently all these small minded people in FoxB haven't talked to a lawyer yet about when they die and their children are unable to take over the family farm/house or business because of the Estate taxes because they refuse to move the town out of the 18th century.

    The "lowlife" people they fear, are coming one way or another. No casino, they will come to take over the abandoned farm houses and turn them into hot houses to produce drugs. With a casino, those low life's will be parking cars for Wynn and making more in a week, than these idiots make in a year on ObamaCare

  10. I have family in Foxborough or Foxboro as is sometimes spelled. It is absolute gridlock during Sunday home games and water pressure to homes goes to a trickle due to the overload usage at the stadium. And you want to introduce a casino into this? And this comment from the reporter is stupid

    "At first blush, it's not a bad bet: Among the throngs who came to watch the Patriots trounce the Buffalo Bills in the regular season-ender New Year's Day, it was hard to find anyone opposed to the idea."

    Of course fans from across New England coming to watch the game would think its a good idea. Go door to door and lets get a real sentiment!

    Can't wait to see the card slappers around the stadium and the trash along RT 140, that would be next along with all the minimum wage jobs it will bring.

  11. Oh yea, one more thing. I recall discussions about the Tampa Bay Rays (MLB) and a football team that I cannot recall possibly relocating into Las Vegas, however, both were shot down due to the legalized gambling etc etc etc.

    Whats up with that? So you're going to build a casino and everything that comes with it actually on the grounds of the football stadium, and, 45 minutes from Fenway Park?

    Whats the NFL and MLB's official position on this? I'm curious.