Las Vegas Sun

January 30, 2015

Currently: 51° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Letter to the editor:

Komen insensitive to contributors

Regarding the recent stories about Susan G. Komen for the Cure Foundation and Planned Parenthood:

In my opinion, the Komen foundation doesn’t have the moral right to take money donated to it to fight cancer and donate it to an organization doing something else, regardless of how meritorious that organization’s work might be.

Like most people, I’ve always understood that the Komen foundation is dedicated to fighting cancer, particularly breast cancer.

If contributors to Komen want to support Planned Parenthood, as well, that’s fine; they can give their money directly.

Komen isn’t the United Way and shouldn’t try to be.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 2 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. It seems that they should be able to give money to someone like Planned Parenthood if the money is being used to do things that are within the scope of their mission. Planned Parenthood provide breast and cervical cancer screenings and other related services and that would seem to be within the mission of the Komen foundation. The problem is that money is fungible and unless PP jumps through a lot of hoops, it is hard to say that some of the money is not supporting abortions or other services. But if Komen's money was only a small portion of what was spent on cancer related services, it would seem unlikely that it was providing any support for other areas. Komen's mistake was not coming out early and explaining what it was trying to do and showing how the money got spent. Pulling and then replacing the funding just created animus on several fronts.

  2. Mr. Davis,

    In my opinion, people with a religious agenda have no right to impose their religious morals on anyone else.

    In the private sector, nothing is stopping you from looking at what any given charitable institution does with their money. If you disagree with how it is used, then don't donate to them. Simple.

    You don't have the right to tell them to stop doing whatever you disagree with, and you especially don't have the right to pass laws to force them to stop, not based upon religion anyway.