Las Vegas Sun

July 24, 2014

Currently: 92° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Federal Government:

Mining on public lands a largely untapped federal revenue source

Because of a law passed during the presidency of Ulysses S. Grant, the federal government does not collect royalties from gold, silver, copper and other minerals extracted from public land, a source of revenue that potentially could generate hundreds of million of dollars for the federal budget, government auditors reported last week.

Although the government collects billions of dollars in royalties from fossil fuels extracted from federal lands and waters, it does not even collect information from hard-rock mine operators about the amount or value of the minerals they take from public land because there are no royalties requirements, according to the report by the Government Accountability Office.

The report was undertaken at the request of Rep. Raul M. Grijalva, R-Ariz., and Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo. Grijalva is co-sponsor of a House bill that would set a 12.5 percent royalty rate on hard-rock minerals.

“There’s a simple legislative fix for this big hole in the federal government’s revenue stream, and it’s only fair that companies benefiting from access to public lands pay their fair share,” Grijalva said. “Congress should make sure disclosure is a priority, and then we can talk about how to make sure the American people financially benefit from the sale of public minerals the way they should have been all along.”

The Mining Law of 1872 was passed during the Grant administration to encourage settlement of Western states by prospectors. Efforts to reform the law over the past 140 years have been blocked by politicians from Western states and the mining industry.

Hard-rock mining companies pay only a few hundred dollars to register and maintain their claim on the land. According to the GAO report, the Interior Department estimated the sales value of hard-rock minerals from federal land to be about $6.41 billion in fiscal year 2011, but there is no way to know for certain.

Luke Popovich, a spokesman for the National Mining Association, said the industry does not oppose “royalties on hard-rock minerals either, provided they don’t harm the competitiveness of our industry and fairly weigh the input costs of mining here in the resource-rich but high-cost U.S.”

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 1 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. So, let me get this straight: If mining takes minerals from FEDERAL lands a new "royalty" law would see to it that the Federal government gets the royalty. If mining takes the mineral from STATE held lands, then the state get the "royalty."

    Question is, how will such a new royalty law directly affect the State of Nevada? Would enjoy knowing what this all means.

    Blessings and Peace,
    Star