Las Vegas Sun

January 30, 2015

Currently: 52° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Letter to the editor:

RNC should not censor delegates

Another view?

View more of the Las Vegas Sun's opinion section:

Editorials - the Sun's viewpoint.

Columnists - local and syndicated writers.

Letters to the editor - readers' views.

Have your own opinion? Write a letter to the editor.

Why is the Republican National Committee censoring its own delegates at its convention? Every American citizen is protected by the Constitution, which gives us our First Amendment rights. The RNC isn’t a part of the federal government and only serves as a platform and leadership for the Republican Party. But sadly, it restricts the core rights of our nation on its own members. Never would I have thought the rules of a political party would supersede the Constitution; this just shows you what’s wrong with this picture — the rules are different for those in power.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 5 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Letter writer is wrong. Delegates agree in writing to the terms and procedures of the paty's convention rules. If they didn't like them, they should not have agreed to them. Period. End of story. Their candidate lost. Move on.


  2. I have said here for months that Paul is a force to be reckon with in the party. I have said too that as social and economic times get hard, people become more conservative. Same is true with Paul's following of libertarians.

    But make no mistake, Paul never tops more than 10 percent nationwide. That's it. That's all he gets. He's 77 and not running for another term in Texas. Too old. This was his last and final hurrah.

    Ron's concern now should be for his son Rand, who most will say is a chip off his father's block. But just a chip now. He [Rand] should concern himself with evolving and growing in the GOP party/Senate in the absence of his father. Forget the libertarian views. They are not and never will be mainstream USA.


  3. "Many Ron Paul supporters will vote OBAMA."

    Mr. Teamster: You said the same about Clint Eastwood [he would vote for Obama] as I recall after this year's Super Bowl. You were wrong.


  4. Mr. Teamster:

    For months on end when I admonished about the political growing strength of Ron Paul in the GOP, you laughed at him and me. Calling Paul all kinds of names and me too. Now you predict his supporters will vote for Obama. Getting desperate all of a sudden? Or an epiphany?


  5. Romney won't miss the one or two Paul voters you talked with. Nevada is going GOP on Nov 6 with or without those 1 or 2, just like Wisconsin and the other swing states.