Las Vegas Sun

May 19, 2013

Currently: 87° | Complete forecast | Log in

Local Government:

Dog that killed boy remains caged, awaiting court ruling

Dog attacks, kills infant

Dog attacks, kills infant

Viewing video requires the latest version of Adobe's Flash Player

KSNV coverage of fatal dog attack and interview with grief-stricken father, April 28, 2012.

Onion, a family dog that killed a 1-year-old Henderson boy in April, still lives in a cage, waiting for the Nevada Supreme Court to decide his fate.

Since the matter went to the state’s high court in June, the city of Henderson has been unable to euthanize the dog, which has been declared vicious under city ordinance.

“There’s no change. We’re still waiting,” said Keith Paul, a spokesman for the Henderson Police Department.

So the 120-pound, 6-year-old Mastiff/Rhodesian ridgeback continues to wait on what might be considered an animal version of death row. He’s kept in two large connected cages at the Henderson Animal Control and Care Facility.

“He can easily stand and walk around and move from one side to the other,” Paul said. “I know he’s seen regularly by a veterinarian.”

It appears Onion could wait in those cages two months or more until the Supreme Court formally begins studying the matter, a court spokesman said.

Onion has been under the care of Henderson animal control officers since April 27, following the deadly attack on Jeremiah Eskew-Skahan, who was at his grandmother’s home to celebrate his first birthday.

The boy reportedly crawled to the dog and pulled on Onion’s fur to stand up, police said. The dog latched onto the boy’s face with his jaws and began shaking him, police said. The boy died at University Medical Center.

After the tragedy, the boy’s grandmother and owner of the dog, Elizabeth Keller, signed papers turning Onion over to an animal control officer.

The city was expected to euthanize Onion, in accordance with its vicious dog ordinance.

“He killed a 1-year-old boy,” Paul said. “Barring a court order, the city law is clear. ... When a dog kills or seriously injures a human, which this dog did and was declared vicious, city law stipulates he would then be euthanized.”

But a group called the Lexus Project intervened.

Lexus, an Oceanside, N.Y., nonprofit organization, has offered to provide funds to place and care for the dog in an animal sanctuary in Yoder, Colo., near Denver. Lexus filed a motion for a temporary restraining order in Clark County District Court to stop the city from euthanizing the animal.

Judge Joanna Kishner denied Lexus’ motion at a hearing in late May. In her ruling, Kishner did not determine what action the city should take with the dog but said Lexus had no legal standing to take the dog because the city now owns it.

Paul said nothing has changed with the animal’s status since Lexus filed its first documents with the Supreme Court in June.

Court records show that a nonpublic mediation attempt between the city and Lexus failed in June. The next scheduled action in court isn’t until September.

Bill Gang, public information officer for the Supreme Court, said Thursday the high court has scheduled Lexus attorneys to file briefs with the court by Sept. 24. In the brief, Lexus is expected to lay out its legal arguments for being able to take over custody of the dog from the city.

“This is just the start of the formal process,” Gang said.

After that, the city’s attorneys would have 30 days to respond to Lexus’ brief, Gang said.

Lexus would then get to reply in writing. After that, it would be up to the Supreme Court to decide what to do.

“They can decide it on the briefs; they can schedule oral arguments. Depending on what other motions come forward, they can rule on those,” Gang said.

Discussion: 3 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. There is a bit of information missing from this article.

    The grandmother was owner and credits the dog for helping her survive cancer.

    At the time of the incident, she signed papers while emotionally traumatized and as the city requires by law.

    Since then, she has said she wants the Lexus Project to have the dog, and placed it in the sanctuary. Unfortunately, the form she signed removed her as owner.

    That is the most difficult part of the process now, and Onion's life is in the hands of the Supreme Court.

    Personally, I think the grandmother's wishes should be respected, as well as the emotional state she was in when told what she must do by animal control. What changes things is there is a viable option that protects the public and allows the grandmother's wishes to be respected regarding saving Onions life.

    Onion was acting instinctively when awoken from sleep by the toddler grabbing his fur.

    There is an alternative. Now the question is will mercy and wisdom save Onion's life?

  2. I see no comments about the cost to the taxpayers about this debacle. Wonder why?????????????

  3. It seems to me, that any legal document signed UNDER DURESS is automatically rendered invalid, as was the signing of the dog's owner directly after, in a traumatized emotional state did. You would think that the City of Henderson's legal department would understand that and not subject this family AND the taxpayers to any further grief. Shame Shame Shame

    If the Court's ruling does not favor the orginal dog owner and Lexus's pleas (considering the original owner signed under duress and within a short time rescinded), then it would most certainly set a new prescident about "decision making and signing under duress". God help our country if this happens.

    Blessings and Peace,
    Star

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.

Most Popular