Las Vegas Sun

May 26, 2013

Currently: 79° | Complete forecast | Log in

Rape conviction of Las Vegas man overturned after 10 years in prison

A federal appeals court has overturned the sexual assault conviction of a Las Vegas man who has spent more than 10 years in prison.

The U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that Calvin O. Jackson, serving three life terms plus other sentences, was prevented from presenting evidence at his trial that the woman had made other false claims of prior sexual assault against him.

The court, in a 2-1 decision, ordered the Clark County District Court to issue a writ freeing Jackson unless the state decides to try him again.

Jackson was convicted of six counts in 1999 in the alleged assault of Annette Heathmon, and he has 45 more years before he would be eligible for parole.

Jackson claimed it was consensual sex.

At trial, Jackson was prevented from introducing police witnesses that Heathmon had made prior accusations on two occasions that Jackson had assaulted her. The police investigation in these cases found the attacks never occurred.

Heathmon alleged Jackson forced his way into her apartment in October 1998, threatened to stab her with a screwdriver if she did not have sex, raped and beat her. She said he cut up some of her clothes, ripped the phone from the wall and stole a ring.

The court, in the majority decision written by Judge Stephen Reinhardt, said there was no evidence of a screwdriver or that any clothes had been cut up. "The nurse who examined Heathmon after the assault found no signs of bruising and no signs of sexual assault, and the responding officer did not observe any readily visible marks or bruises," said the court.

Prior to the Jackson trial, Heathmon recanted her accusation of assault in a notarized letter. But when threatened with a perjury charge, she agreed to testify.

The appeals court said the exclusion of the critical evidence of the prior false accusations of assault by Heathmon would have undermined her credibility and was "a clear violation of Jackson's right to present an adequate defense."

Judge Alfred Goodwin dissented, saying rejection of the proffered evidence "was not a constitutional error" by the state trial court or the federal district court. He said these courts followed a federal law involving claims made in state courts.

Discussion: 5 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. "Best legal system in the world"?

  2. It would be appreciated if you would provide the names of both the lead prosecutor and the judge in this case.

  3. Let's see what all this story leaves out other than what Brooke pointed out. The "victim" and Jackson were had been in a relationship for a decade when these allegations were made, and she was a prostitute, who may have been hooking on the nights in question.

    This case has Diminutive Davey Rogers all over it. The suppression of evidence, threatening a witness/victim with jail if they don't lie on the stand. The anything for a conviction, even in the obvious absence of a crime is what the Lilliputian litigator built his career on.

    If it wasn't him, is this criminally negligent attorney still getting paid with my tax dollars?

  4. I see a suit coming.

  5. When threatened with a perjury charge..... Someone in the prosecutor's office needs to answer for this abuse of power. There are many wackies out there including, it seems, the accuser. There was NO NEED to prosecute when the "victim" recanted.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.

Most Popular