Las Vegas Sun

September 16, 2014

Currently: 86° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Environmental impact statement issued for proposed water pipeline

CARSON CITY — The final environmental impact statement has been released on plans by the Southern Nevada Water Authority to pump nearly 84,000 acre feet of water a year from rural counties to Las Vegas.

An acre foot of water is 325,851 gallons.

The Bureau of Land Management, which released the report, said a decision whether to grant the right of way for construction on public lands will not be made before Oct. 1.

The environmental impact statement estimates the project would include 263 miles of buried water pipeline, 280 miles of power lines, six electrical substations, a 40-million-gallon-per-day buried storage reservoir and a 165-million-gallon-per-day water treatment plant.

State Engineer Jason King issued a ruling in March that would allow water to be pumped from Lincoln and White Pine counties.

King’s decision is being challenged in District Court in White Pine County; no hearing date has been set.

Zane Marshall, director of environmental resources for the water authority, said this was one of the most comprehensive studies of a municipal water project and the pipeline “is critical to both Southern Nevada and our entire state’s future.”

Marshall said moving the project forward “gives Southern Nevadans a safety net against potential shortages.”

The Great Basin Water Network, opposed to the pipeline, said the environmental impact statement outlines an environmental, economic and social disaster if the project is allowed to go forward.

Susan Lynn, coordinator of the network that includes ranchers, sportsmen, tribal representatives and environmentalists, said the BLM must reject the project in its final decision in October.

The network said the biggest concern may be the $15.5 billion cost of the project.

Launce Rake, a board member of the water network, said spending that money will benefit contractors and Wall Street finance companies, “but it does not make our community more secure.”

Rake said the water authority needs to concentrate on conservation.

“The SNWA this year has budgeted $10 million for water conservation. Compare that to the billions of dollars the agency would charge ratepayers on pumping schemes that would increase our dependency on unreliable and unsustainable ground water reserves,” Rake said.

The water authority did not have any immediate comment.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 1 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. As I see it, that $15.5B cost comes to almost $8K person in the Las Vegas valley. The only place the money can come from is the current customers. I don't think that an additional $8K to the existing water bills is acceptable no matter how many years they spread it over, especially since the only purpose for this pipeline is to allow builders, contracters, and banks to make more money via increased growth.