Las Vegas Sun

October 25, 2014

Currently: 73° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

j. patrick coolican:

Why is higher ed getting pushed around?

J. Patrick Coolican

J. Patrick Coolican

The Redfield name can be seen all over campus at UNR. The Nell J. Redfield Foundation has given about $40 million during the past three decades for gems such as the auditorium in the math and science building, a student health clinic and the Redfield Theatre.

So when a director of the foundation, Gerald Smith, wrote a letter to the Board of Regents recommending that interim UNR President Marc Johnson be appointed president permanently, no doubt regents noticed.

The foundation went one step further, however, warning of consequences if Johnson wasn’t appointed.

“Should the Regents select a stranger to fill the vacancy, there can be no assurance that current funding discussions will continue or that the projects currently being considered for funding will receive support in the future,” the letter said.

More than one regent found the letter threatening.

Dr. Mark Doubrava voted for Johnson and called him a “capable individual who will do a very good job.” (The point here isn’t about Johnson, who by all accounts is very capable.)

But Doubrava also said he found the letter “threatening” and reflective of a process that “appeared almost orchestrated” to anoint Johnson. The letter was dated April 5, one day after UNR boasted of receiving a $1.6 million gift from the foundation for the medical school.

In a phone interview, Smith said, “I see nothing threatening in the letter. I think it’s a pretty obvious statement of fact. We’ve been involved with the leadership of the university for many years. As a result of our involvement with Marc Johnson, we’ve developed a strong working relationship with him due to his leadership and vision. If he were appointed, we would have the same working relationship.”

Smith added: “If someone else were appointed, we would have no way of knowing what that relationship would be.”

Smith said he couldn’t think of another case in which the foundation had weighed in like this on an issue affecting the future of the university.

For Kevin Page, vice chairman of the regents and whose decades in Nevada are belied by his lingering Queens accent, the letter was just one aspect of a search process he found so flawed that he abstained from voting for Johnson.

“Send a letter of support. Don’t send a letter of support with a threat in it. That’s what they did,” Page said.

Click to enlarge photo

Dan Klaich, right, vice chancellor of the Nevada System of Higher Education, speaks with Chancellor Jim Rogers at a 2006 meeting.

Nevada System of Higher Education Chancellor Dan Klaich sent me a statement: “I certainly do not read that letter ... as a threat. Nor do I think a reasonable person reading it fairly could do so.”

Mr. Chancellor: Am I not a reasonable person?

Klaich continued: “Mr. Smith is indicating, not surprisingly so, that the contributions of the Redfield Foundation have been based in the large part on their trust in the leadership at UNR, including Dr. Johnson. ... Should that leadership, and/or vision change, they indicate they would reconsider future gifts. What could be more natural from a major donor who is committed to impact gifts?”

Let’s ask a major donor who is committed to impact gifts.

Klaich’s predecessor as chancellor, Jim Rogers, is one of the biggest donors to the University of Arizona, specifically its law school, but he said he wouldn’t dare make demands about personnel. Rogers is certainly no shrinking violet, but when the university needed a new dean for the law school, he called the university president and told him he didn’t want to be on the search committee, even though he’d be a natural choice given his experience in higher education and relationship with the law school. The university president, in Rogers’ telling, scoffed at the very idea of Rogers on the search committee. “He said, ‘What made you think you would be on the committee? We’re going to pick the best dean, and it won’t have anything to do with you.’”

As for the Redfield letter, Rogers called it “outrageous.”

He added: “I’m disappointed they would not be sophisticated enough to know to stay the hell out, disappointed they would put that in writing and distressed they would make it a threat and compromise Johnson.”

I’m inclined to agree but must say I’m not entirely surprised: Nevada’s public institutions get pushed around by private interests all the time. Just visit Carson City during next year’s legislative session, and you’ll see what I mean.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 3 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Nothing complicated here. It's the age old golden rule: He who has the gold, makes the rules.

    Also, another popular childhood saying comes to mind: "If you don't play like I want to play, I'll take my toys and go home. Then you'll be sorry."

  2. It was a threat. Period. The foundation should be ashamed. The university should distance itself from the foundation.

  3. Comment removed by moderator. Off Topic