Las Vegas Sun

March 30, 2015

Currently: 90° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account


Brookings: Parents here pay double on housing to send children to our best performing elementary schools

Parents pay about $8,500 more a year to send their children to the best-performing elementary schools in Las Vegas -- the cost of buying homes in the neighborhoods served by those schools, a Brookings Institution report released Thursday concludes.

The report found that students from poorer households tend to go to schools where scores on state standardized tests are lower while more affluent students tend to go to schools with higher test scores. The findings confirm what numerous studies and a recent Sun analysis have also found.

The average student from a low-income family in Las Vegas attended a school that tested in the 43rd percentile. The average student from a middle- or high-income family went to a school that scored in the 66th percentile, according to the report, which used state test score data listed on

Despite this achievement gap, Las Vegas ranks about average in access to top schools when compared with the rest of the country, said Jonathan Rothwell, a Brookings senior research analyst and author of the report. Rothwell looked at test scores of more than 84,000 public schools in the 100 largest metropolitan areas in the nation for his report.

Rothwell’s research went further than other studies that looked at socioeconomic data and school performance, however. His report is among the first looking at how zoning policies affect home prices and student access to high-quality schools.

Rothwell argues municipal zoning policies that restrict affordable housing have segregated students from low-income families from their more affluent peers, creating achievement gaps in schools.

During the housing bubble, Las Vegas’ zoning laws led to the proliferation of single-family homes and the creation of upscale suburbs such as Green Valley and Summerlin.

Although housing prices in Las Vegas have remained lower than other major cities, the lack of affordable or multiple-unit housing — such as apartments and townhouses — has priced lower-income families out of neighborhoods with top-performing schools, Rothwell said.

Annual housing costs near the highest-scoring elementary schools in Las Vegas were more than double — or about $8,500 more per year — the housing costs near low-scoring schools, according to the report.

Nationally, home values are $205,000 higher on average in neighborhoods with top-scoring schools than in neighborhoods with low-scoring schools, the report found.

“During the boom, housing was being built where the demand is highest – near higher-performing schools, jobs and parks,” Rothwell said. “We need a careful review of zoning laws and ways to move toward more market-oriented results.”

Rothwell suggested several solutions to mitigate the achievement gap created in part by “restrictive” zoning and housing policies. Many of his suggestions already are being used by the Clark County School District.

Magnet and charter schools can attract students from across the valley, regardless of their attendance zones, Rothwell said. Voucher programs, where the government gives per-pupil funding for a public school student to attend a private school, could also be an option, he said.

The new Brookings report confirmed a recent Sun analysis that found a higher prevalence of top-performing schools in more affluent Las Vegas neighborhoods.

In February, the Clark County School District became the first in Nevada to implement a school ranking system. The School Performance Framework ranked Las Vegas elementary and middle schools on a one- to five-star scale, with the highest-performing five-star schools showing the most academic growth and proficiency. (High school rankings are expected in May.)

Here are some of the Sun’s main findings:

(Disclaimer: School attendance zones don't match up with ZIP codes. The Sun used ZIP codes because there are no data for median home prices for attendance zones. Students also have a form of school choice with open enrollment programs, magnet and charter school options – but most Las Vegas children attend their neighborhood schools.)

    • If you buy a house in the most affluent neighborhoods in the valley – the top quarter of ZIP codes where the median home price exceeds $132,250 – you’ll have nearly eight times the odds of having a four- or five-star school in your area than the poorest neighborhoods in the valley – the bottom quarter of ZIP codes with median home values under $68,106.

    • If you’re among the half million Las Vegans living in a ZIP code where the median home price exceeds $128,000, you are guaranteed to have at least a three-star or higher elementary or middle school in your neighborhood.

    • Although there are a few four- and five-star schools located in poorer neighborhoods — such as Hewetson Elementary — the county’s highest-performing schools are less prevalent in these areas than in more affluent neighborhoods.

    • The median home price for the entire Las Vegas Valley is $107,000.

      Of the 170 elementary and middle schools located in ZIP codes where the median home price is less than the valley median, just 18 percent are four- or five-star schools.

      In contrast, there are 108 elementary and middle schools located in ZIP codes where the median home value exceeds $107,000. Nearly half – 46 percent – of those schools are four- and five-star schools.

    • Two neighborhoods — in Henderson and Spring Valley — each have three five-star schools, the most of any areas in the valley.

      Henderson ZIP code 89012 has five-star elementary schools Lamping, Twitchell and Vanderberg. The median home price in this neighborhood is $160,000.

      Southwest valley ZIP code 89147 has five-star elementary schools Bendorf, Hayes and Roger Bryan. The median home price in this neighborhood is $115,000.

    • ZIP code 89104, in the eastern valley, has three one-star schools, the most of any area. Those one-star schools are Innovations Charter elementary and middle schools and Fremont Middle School. The median home price in this ZIP code is $59,000.

    • There are 217 elementary schools and 59 middle schools in the School District's school ranking system.

      The rankings for Clark County elementary schools are distributed fairly evenly, with a third of schools being four- or five-star schools, a third being three-star schools and a third being one- or two-star schools.

      On the other hand, the rankings for Clark County's middle schools are skewed lower. Nearly 90 percent of Clark County middle schools are three-star or lower. There are only seven four-star middle schools and zero five-star middle schools.

    • The majority of the School District’s top five-star schools are located in the wealthier, outer suburbs of Las Vegas in neighborhoods such as Summerlin and Green Valley. Fewer five-star schools are located in the older, urban core of the valley.

      The average school ranking for schools in Summerlin is 4.4. The average school ranking for schools in Green Valley is 3.8.

    • There is a significant positive correlation between median home price and the number of stars a school has, according to UNLV sociology professor Shannon Monnat, who did a statistical analysis of the School District's school ranking data and median home price for the Sun. This means that as the median home price increases, so does a school's ranking.

      The correlation is "statistically significant," Monnat added. That means there is a high level of confidence that this relationship between median home price and school rankings is repeatable and accurate.

    • In a survey conducted by the National Association of Realtors last year, 75 percent of respondents said the quality of public schools in one's neighborhood was very or somewhat important when considering the community they wanted to live in.

    Join the Discussion:

    Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

    Full comments policy

    Previous Discussion: 10 comments so far…

    Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

    Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

    1. The school district should think about increasing the number of Magnet and Charter Schools, especially Magnet Schools. Our area's children are applying to Magnet Schools in greater number than positions available. It is a fact that Magnet Schools have more engaging programs that "hook" the interests and goals of students who attend.

      Every student that I have had going to such a school, have been incredibly happy about going. They work hard, but they also feel like they are building their future. And the joy a student has when sharing their experiences at a Magnet School is priceless! Children coming from poorer areas CAN and WILL succeed, even thrive exponentially, if we provide them what they need. It is every dedicated teacher's goal to prepare their students for their highest potential in life. More Magnet Schools would certainly support this.

      Blessings and Peace,

    2. Really, another expensive "study" to tell us what is so obvious? If only all the money that went to inane research on education went to classroom supplies and technology instead...

    3. Consider North Las Vegas as a lab for these findings. NLV's public housing was/is a disaster to the extent that multi-family housing was essentially abandoned and Section 8 vouchers given to families to disperse that recipient population. With the collapse of the housing market and purchases by investors middle class housing became affordable for Section 8 in middle class neighborhoods. Kids previously educated in poorly performing schools now have the opportunity to attend better performing schools. What will be the outcomes of this? Teachers and administrators at the impacted schools can tell you that adaptation issues are already making their presence felt. Can the school and its staff and students inculcate "middle class" values in poor kids or will those "poverty" values gain a critical mass?

      This discussion has been around for a long time in both academia and popular culture. Can knuckle-draggers be turned into gentlemen? Can Cockneys learn to speak English? Can trailer trash learn to drink designer wine?

    4. This "study" is worse than useless. Generally, the Sun rises in the East -- and we don't need a study to tell us that. We don't need a "study" to tell us that, generally, kids in more affluent neighborhoods test better that kids in poorer neighborhoods. That doesn't mean that the schools are better or the teachers are better -- it just means that the kids test better.

      Often teachers in the "best" schools have the least positive impact on their students and teachers in the "worst" schools effect the most positive change in the lives of their students. [This is established by doing "value-added" measurement and analyses of teachers and following their students over time.] So the extra money spent on buying houses near "good" schools is probably irrelevant from the point of view of getting a better education for kids. The money might be better spent on a bigger house elsewhere, or on trips with the kids that stimulate their interests in a wide variety of things and give them broader perspectives.

    5. It's not about "bad" schools and teachers in areas with lower house prices and unfavorable zoning laws; it's about the poverty in those areas that restricts and/or undermines education. Schools don't cause poverty or the lack of early childhood exposure to books, wide exposure to and learning of vocabulary, or acquisition of other valuable learning experiences that provide the strong and necessary foundation for academic success. When these things don't happen, children don't usually catch up. Moving a child of poverty into a higher performing school in a wealthier area won't magically create that foundation. Ending poverty and providing strong and enriching birth through all of early childhood education will create the strong foundation needed for academic success. Then, all schools will perform well, regardless of where they exist.

    6. My daughter is fortunate to be able to attend a magnet school where she and the other students are receiving an excellent education. The school has a wide variety of programs available for the parents ranging from nutrition to parenting to how to help their children with schoolwork. I think that's really key when dealing with families in poverty...teach them what they should be doing with their children so their children can succeed. It sure seems to be working at my daughter's school.

    7. While income can be a measure of a school's success, it is not the only factor to examine. The dedication/education/creativity/training of teachers and administrators must also be recognized as factors of a student's success. When looking at 2 schools with identical enrollment areas (Katz and McMillan on Rock Springs Dr. off Lake Mead) it can be assumed that student achievment and performance ratings would be identical. The children are from the same neighborhoods with the same amount of free/reduced lunch students. Children with odd number addresses attend one school with even number addresses attending the other. WRONG! One school is a 4 star school while the other is a 2 star school. The difference? Teachers and administrators. With funds at a premium and the prospect of less money to do more with, let's begin looking beyond the obvious and really examine some solutions - empowering those that work with students the flexibility and support they need to improve achievement. THANK YOU Katz staff for providing an excellent education to our granddaughters!

    8. The majority of our teachers in the US scored in the bottom 1/3rd on their college entrance exams. While the countries with the top ranked students hire most of their teachers from the top 1/3rd.

      Until we stop hiring the dumbest of our college educated citizens to teach our kids we'll continue to lose our competitive advantage.

      We should fire half of our teachers tomorrow and put the other half on notice. Our teachers simply aren't good enough. Period. Stop hiring idiots to teach our kids. Stop it!!!!

    9. Well, we had a nice string of commentary going there...

      Poor Douglas.

      Socio-economics, kids;
      I've been beating that drum here @ the Sun for years for people like Dougie to hear, but due to their prejudicial nature, they fail to listen.
      It's as elementary as A, B, C, 1, 2, 3 to you & me...
      But yes, Doug; blame stupid teachers. Carry on, sir.

    10. I just moved here from Florida where the state pays for PreK . They also have full day kindergarten with no extra cost. That is investing and getting students ready for school. Teachers get paid less than here. My daughter is a teacher in a poor distict. Her children come to school with her. They spend alot more money in the poorer schools. My grandson is in Middle School doing wonderful. This state doesn't invest enough money into the students. By the way Charter Schools are run by businesses FOR PROFIT AND are not watched by the state.