Las Vegas Sun

March 30, 2015

Currently: 90° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

The Policy Racket

Mitt Romney, Rick Perry take center stage at GOP debate


Jae C. Hong / AP

Republican presidential candidates former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, left, and Texas Gov. Rick Perry answer a question during a Republican presidential candidate debate at the Reagan Library Wednesday, Sept. 7, 2011, in Simi Valley, Calif.

Let the two-way race begin.

Polls in Nevada and across the country have been showing for weeks that the race for the Republican presidential nomination comes down to two candidates: Mitt Romney and Rick Perry.

At Wednesday night’s debate at the Ronald Reagan Library in California, the front runners laid into each other on the key election issues of Social Security, health care and jobs. Romney and Perry dominated the conversation, attempting to draw distinctions between their positions.

On jobs.

“If I’d spent my whole life in government, I wouldn’t be running for president right now,” Romney said, in a dig at Perry, the Texas governor.

Countering, Perry said that while Romney, a businessman and former Massachusetts governor, “had a good private-sector record, his public sector record did not match that.”

On health care.

“I understand health care pretty darn well, having been through what I went through as a governor,” Romney said, referencing his experience pushing a health care bill through in Massachusetts, where nearly all residents have coverage. “What President Obama put in place, it’s not going to work; it’s massively expensive.”

Massachusetts leads the country in access to health insurance. Texas, where 25 percent of people go without health insurance, is dead last.

But Perry said, “I’ll tell you what people in the state of Texas don’t want, they don’t want a health care plan like governor Romney put place.”

And, most sharply, on Social Security.

“It is a monstrous lie. It is a Ponzi scheme,” Perry said, labeling Social Security as the ultimate in fraudulent rackets. “Maybe it’s time to have provocative language in this country,” he said, when challenged.

Romney scolded him. “You can’t say that to tens of millions of Americans who live on Social Security and those who have lived on it,” Romney said. “Under no circumstances would I ever say it is a failure. It is working for millions of Americans and I’ll keep it working.”

That we’ve come to the point where two front runners are taking off the gloves is bound to help Obama’s re-election efforts, but it complicates his messaging in the next few critical days on jobs.

Romney came out with an economic restructuring plan yesterday; Obama unveils his jobs prescription before a joint session of Congress tomorrow. But as the Republican position diversifies between candidates, it will get harder for Obama draw a distinction between the Republican position and his own.

“The nominating contests will play themselves out, and there’s not much that the president or the campaign can do but watch that happen,” former White House press secretary and Obama adviser Robert Gibbs said before the debate. “What you see the Republicans outline are the very same ideas that, quite frankly, originated to get us into the mess that we’re in now.”

Romney and Perry took center stage at the debate right off the bat. They dominated the first several minutes with a polite dialogue that quickly turned into the best sparring of the night on jobs.

“We created more jobs in the last three months in Texas than he did in four years in Massachusetts,” Perry said of Romney.

“Wait a second. States are different,” Romney retorted. “Texas has zero income tax. Texas has a lot of oil and gas in the ground...But governor Perry wouldn’t say he created those things...That would be like Al Gore saying he created the Internet.”

Perry countered, saying, “Michael Dukakis created jobs three times faster than you did, Mitt,” referencing the former Democratic governor of Massachusetts who made an unsuccessful run for president in 1988.

Romney didn’t let it go. “As a matter of fact, George Bush and his predecessor created jobs faster than you did,” Romney said to some vigorous head shaking by Perry.

Candidate Jon Huntsman, who’s at the back of the pack, would eventually weigh in to remind the field that when it comes to job creation, Utah was No. 1 under his leadership.

Oh, yes, there were other candidates in the room.

Michele Bachmann, who won a straw poll in Iowa and emerged as an early favorite of conservatives, seemed to assert her relevance at first. But after several worn answers on “Obamacare,” the MSNBC and POLITICO moderators seemed to forget about her, along with the rest of the audience.

That might not make that much of a difference to Nevada, which Bachmann hasn’t yet factored into her early state strategy.

It wasn’t such a great night for Ron Paul, either.

Paul was weaker than in past debates, sticking stubbornly to his libertarian, Constitution-only philosophy when moderator Brian Williams pushed him to allow the federal government some non-enumerated powers, like regulating food safety or operating air traffic control towers.

Paul wouldn’t budge, taking his thematic point about the markets being the best regulator to an academic limit.

The other back-of-the-pack candidates had their moments, too, but they didn’t do much to promote themselves on the big issues.

Herman Cain’s repeated advocacy of a “9-9-9” tax scheme started to ring like a pizza chain sales pitch when his staff began soliciting $9.99 donations via Twitter during the debate.

Newt Gingrich, as in the last debate, used much of his time to criticize the moderators for asking the wrong kinds of questions.

Rick Santorum questioned the conservatism of the front runners — Romney for authoring a health care bill and Perry for mandating human papilloma vaccinations, which, Santorum said, in the ultimate insult, sounds like something Obama would do.

It was a low moment for Perry, who had to that point been the one slinging slights Texas style.

Yet when Perry’s answer of, “I hate cancer...I will always err on the side of saving lives,” wasn’t enough to deflect the mounting criticism, it was Romney who came to his defense.

“We’ve each taken a mulligan or two,” Romney said, silently referencing how the others, including Perry, had jumped on him for authoring Massachusetts’ health care bill. “I think his heart was in the right place.”

The gesture seemed to be appreciated for the moment it lasted. But this is a race for the presidential nomination. Now back into the ring.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 7 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. This picture is perfect if you ask yourself how many times in your life did someone wearing a suit and a smile actually do something good for you?

    Way scary. Or the only thing more scary is these clowns are being seriously supported to run this country.

    "After coming into contact with a religious man I always feel I must wash my hands." -- Friedrich Nietzsche, 1888 "Ecce Homo - Why I Am a Destiny"

  2. Rick Perry...

    Is this guy for real???
    A living caricature,
    and as smart & savvy as a LUMMOX.

    Romney clearly the class of this Clown Convention,
    but his policies are proven parsimony that punk the middle class, while catering to the Corporate Crew, and clearly run counter to creating J.O.B.S.!

  3. "NBC News Political Unit" after the debate Polling shows Ron Paul wining the debate with over 48% of nearly 100,000 votes cast despite the lack of questions to Dr Paul.

    While the national media continues to pretend Ron Paul can't win the nomination. Ron Paul may need to become the Independent candidate for President as the national press and Republicans have apparently forgot to ask everyday Americans who they want for President.

    Ron Paul is a threat to the status quo of big Government failed American domestic and foreign policy as well as the failed polices of the private Federal Reserve with inflated money supply backing wall-street and to big to fail banks in this country and other banks international.

    Perhaps most Americans have awoken from the very bad dream and realize our nation is in uncharted waters (broke-unemployed-never ending wars) and is ready for a sea change course correction to upright the good ship USA?

    Unfortunately, all other current Presidential candidates seem to offer more of the same medicine that got us to the sad place we find ourselves in today. . .

  4. I don't know which one of them improved their chances from this debate, or who won or lost.

    I did enjoy the talk about Social Security that was thrown out there. Each and every one of them helped immeasurably in ensuring the Republican Party dies a slow agonizing death by their attacks on that institution. The American voter will hang that on each one of their necks by the stupid rhetoric about it. In other words, the Republican Party strategy of personalizing, privatizing, destroying, dismantling and/or ignoring Social Security continues. They will pay for that in the voting booths. Horribly.

    I do know all eight of those candidates actually share one commonality.

    That's the closest they will EVER get to Air Force One.

  5. I feel Jon Huntsman is the man to watch. Gingrich, Backmann, Paul, and the other three are just wasting time and money.It still amazes me how these people really can't say what they would do to turn the economy around. All they want is to get rid of Obama. This country will continue to skid unless people and politicians work together. Creating jobs is not an easy task when there is nothing the world needs from America, and Americans can't affords to buy a lot of uneccessary items today. It is a great country, but it has more to learn about other countries and people in the world. Basically the world can survive without American products.

  6. I thought Newt's comment was interesting when he stated that everyone on the stage agreed that they wanted Obama to be a one term president. He could have said something like everyone on the stage agreed that they wanted something better for the country or they wanted to get the country back on track or they wanted to make the country great again, and one of them could do it better than Obama. But Newt's focus, and that of the other republican candidates, is to defeat Obama. The state of the country is not their first concern.

  7. "The sheer ignorance of believing that prayer is a valid response to the plight of millions of Americans."

    mgmHarley -- your post rules here.

    "Fear is the foundation of most governments." - John Adams, 1776 "Thoughts on Government"