Las Vegas Sun

November 25, 2014

Currently: 57° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Governor signs health care transparency bills into law

Brian Sandoval

Brian Sandoval

Sheila Leslie

Sheila Leslie

CARSON CITY — Gov. Brian Sandoval has signed a package of bills that will greatly increase the amount of information about hospital quality available to the public, a “remarkable achievement” toward improving health care safety, according to a legislator.

The five bills followed an award-winning series by the Sun that highlighted the lack of candor among hospitals about quality of patient care, including incidents of infections, accidents and patient readmissions at the facilities.

The legislation requires the state to publish facility-by-facility breakdowns of the “sentinel events” — accidents that are considered preventable.

“Taken together as a package, this was a remarkable achievement,” said state Sen. Sheila Leslie, D-Reno, sponsor of one of the bills.

The medical community, both hospitals and doctors, had in past legislative sessions resisted efforts to increase transparency. But this session, in the wake of the Sun’s five-part series, “Do No Harm: Hospital Care in Las Vegas,” they supported the changes to health care regulation.

“The Sun deserves a lot of the credit for raising public awareness, and increasing consumer demand for the information,” Leslie said. “Those articles were translated into policy improvements that will have a positive effect on the public.”

Richard Whitley, administrator of the state Health Division, said the measures “are good next steps toward greater transparency in health care quality.”

He said the data now must be transformed by state staff into “information that is more useful and understandable to the public, health care providers and policymakers.”

The first report will be due in 2012, Whitley said.

Bobbette Bond of the Nevada Health Care Policy Group said the bills were an important step toward improving health care in Nevada.

But now that the public will be able to compare hospital quality, advocates, hospitals and doctors will have to work at eliminating medical mistakes to lower costs, Bond said. Additionally, future policy discussions will focus on making the cost of procedures transparent, so the public can get even more information to make health care decisions, she said.

Leslie said that before the 2013 legislative session, she will work on language defining the “events” that hospitals have to report.

A Sunday Reno Gazette-Journal story — based on data provided by the Sun — highlighted how hospitals interpret the language affects how they report it.

“Hospitals may be interpreting reporting guidelines differently,” Leslie said. “My next step will be to take a look at how to determine what events to report.”

She proposed defining “adverse events” but “it became complicated very quickly. I think it’ll need more study to clarify the definitions to make sure everyone is reporting in the same manner.”

Meanwhile, the public will start seeing information publicly posted in 2012.

The major bills approved by the Legislature and signed by the governor are:

• Senate Bill 209: Requires the state Health Division to publish annual reports on its website comparing “sentinel events” in hospitals in Clark and Washoe counties. The bill defines a sentinel event as an “unexpected occurrence involving facility-acquired infection, death or serious physical or psychological injury.”

• Senate Bill 264: Requires reporting of the readmissions of patients if the readmission was potentially preventable and related to the initial admission. Money raised through administrative penalties could be used for training to improve the quality of care. The Health Division will report at least quarterly its findings regarding the analysis of trends of sentinel events on the Internet.

• Senate Bill 338: Requires each medical facility and nursing home that provides care to 25 or more patients to report sentinel events to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention program. The state Health Division would be required to access and publish that information on all medical facilities after Oct. 15, and nursing homes Jan. 1. The reports would allow comparisons among facilities.

• Senate Bill 339: Requires doctors to inform patients about infections acquired in hospitals. The law mandates that patients, or their families or guardians, be told of the infections within five days. There are exceptions, such as when a patient is comatose or suicidal.

• Senate Bill 340: Hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers would be required to report the names of physicians performing surgical procedures and information about those procedures. It is a step toward linking doctors to potentially adverse medical events.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 1 comment so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Hopefully on SB340, the patient gets the information in sufficient time so that they can look up the names of their surgeons and records, prior to their operations.

    It is really difficult to legislate quality patient care, or staff that cares. A helpless patient in a hospital would like to believe that when they click on the "light" for assistance, that they will receive assistance in a timely way. It should NOT be a 50/50 deal, should it be a life threatening situation, or pose a danger. Sad to say, that last August, I had an unfortunate experience at a newer north Las Vegas area hospital, that forced me to wait 10 minutes, another 10 minutes, another 10 minutes, and finally after the last 10 =40, I untied all my monitors and systems and walked myself to the restroom! This happened a few times, and they tried to cover it up by chastizing me! Now, I am having problems and may need to get my operation redone. I really fear the thought of having to return to THAT hospital!!!

    And in case you are saying, didn't you say something to the doctor, I did at the check up and was politely blown off. Yeah. Patients don't have much power. We have insurance and co-payments, that's it.