Las Vegas Sun

March 1, 2015

Currently: 61° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Report ranks Clark County among last in high school graduation rates

Dwight Jones

Dwight Jones

A detailed analysis in a story in Education Week, raises further questions about the accuracy of previously reported high school graduation rates for the Clark County and Washoe County school districts, which are responsible for educating 85 percent of the state's public school students.

The Education Week numbers produced with the Editorial Projects in Education Research Center show that Nevada’s high school graduation rate was 44.3 percent for the academic year ending in 2008. That placed it 50th in the country, just behind of the District of Columbia, which recorded a 43 percent graduation rate.

New Jersey led the nation with an 86.9 percent graduation rate, followed by Vermont at 82.7 percent and Wisconsin with a rate of 81.3. The national average was 71.7 percent.

The Clark County School District lists its 2008 high school graduation rate at 65 percent, according to data found on its website. The Washoe County School District places its 2008 high school graduation rate at 56 percent, according to a report on its website.

The Education Week article notes that the 71.7 percent national average in 2008 was the highest figure since the mid-1980s and followed two consecutive years of decline and stagnation, and it offered a troublesome note for Nevadans.

“The 44-percentage-point chasm separating the highest- and lowest-performing states remains alarming,” the story says. “The national leaders — New Jersey, North Dakota, Vermont, and Wisconsin — each graduate more than 80 percent of their high school students. At the other extreme of the rankings, fewer than six in 10 students finish high school in the District of Columbia, Georgia, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, and South Carolina. Overall, graduation rates in about half the states fall within 5 points of the national average of 72 percent.”

Long-stated doubts about the accuracy of the Clark County figures have been a point of public frustration for the district’s new superintendent, Dwight Jones, who assumed the job in November and is in the process of adopting a revised methodology that would have placed the school district’s previously reported June 2009 high school graduation rate at 51 percent rather than the previously reported 68 percent.

Jones has publicly expressed his frustrations with the reported numbers, saying that district officials must be open and transparent about the numbers before taxpayers, business and political leaders will support the district’s needs.

Clark County public school administrators have previously discounted from the graduation figures tens of thousands of students who disappeared from the region’s high schools between the 9th and 12th grades. Top officials routinely argued that an unknown, untraceable number of students were lost to transient families that moved in and out of the region and argued that the district had no way of determining what percentage of those students dropped out of school rather than transferring to schools elsewhere in the country.

The new graduation rate is designed to account for the number of students who start the 9th grade with the Clark County School District and finish within four years with a high school diploma rather than a less stringent certificate of attendance. The formula is intended to accurately account for students who transfer in and out of the school system during that period. The Education Week analysis employs a similar formula.

Pedro Martinez, the Clark County School District’s newly hired deputy superintendent of instruction, says just 10 of every 100 students who start the 9th grade within the school district will receive a college bachelor’s degree. That is about half of the national average, and the Southern Nevada figure is lower for ethnic minority students.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 8 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. This is why businesses are hesitant to relocate here. It has nothing to do with taxes or politics just the applicant pool.

  2. @pnmmart. The fuss about losing teachers is NOT settled. The district is getting an extra 250 MILLION from the state. The district still wants concessions from the unions, which include paycuts, etc. which will have to negotiated.

    Graduation rates do not change overnight. Teachers see a student for 50 minutes per day, for 184 days a year. Nothing has been said about the parent's responsibility in education. Do you know who your student's teachers are? When was the last time you checked Parent Link? Do you know how many absences your student has? Do you know the school office phone number? Have told your student that getting a diploma is important?

  3. Anyone really surprised? The public school system is broken beyond repair and should be dismantled. A private school school system should replace it with vouchers given to parents so they can make the choice of which school will better educate their childer instead of nameless, faceless, unelected, unaccountable bureaucratic drones!

  4. @Pnmmart, your post it totally correct.


    You gave me the same response that you gave to PNMMart a month or too ago on this subject. How many times have you used that line to make other people feel like they are the problem? You do not need to have a child in the school district here, to know it's messed up.

    You can't give a number or an intelligent answer to the problem! Were in last place. I say get rid of the whole program. Obviously it's not working, is it?

  5. Hey, FINK...
    Get a clue!!!

    Certainly no one with an ounce of sense can deny the blatently obvious...

    Our Hispanic population drags down test scores and ravages the graduation rate numbers. Just the facts.

  6. The precipitous drop in graduation rates and test scores is a direct result of Clark County's exploding Hispanic population.

    In 20 years the percentage of hispanic students has skyrocketed above 50% as a result of massive illegal immigration and supercharged birth rates.

    Our civic duty to educate Latin America's children has come at a frightening cost indeed.

  7. This is why a bill made it to the gov's desk that would allow students that failed a subject to still graduate. Luckily he had the common sense to veto the thing.

    I guess they figure if they can't teach them...just pass them anyways.

    So everyone knows it was suported and lobbied by the teachers union. You would never find that story in this paper luckily there are other sources.

  8. Instead of placing blame, I want you people to be rational and think a little bit deeper than you normally do (if at all possible): Here we go:

    There are many states whose graduation rates are better than CCSD. Is it the CCSD teachers? Think about it. There are only a handful of local teachers. Most of them were recruited from all over the US and some from abroad. What is it? Did they lose their "teacher ability" when they came here?

    Let us think about the community from those states who have higher graduation rates. Compare them to Las Vegas. Got any clues there?

    Think about the parents and families of those states with higher graduation rates. Are you getting any hints?

    Think about the school systems in those states with higher graduation rates and the people who run those systems. You see any similarities?

    If you can think as I ask, research if you need to, post here what you find and blame whomever you want, but please give Ceasar what is Ceasar's.

    But then again, thinking would probably be too much to ask.