Las Vegas Sun

December 19, 2014

Currently: 45° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Where do hospital safety disclosure bills stand in Legislature?

President and CEO of the Nevada Hospital Association Bill Welch answers a question during a meeting of the Nevada Legislative Committee on Health Care Tuesday, July 20, 2010.

President and CEO of the Nevada Hospital Association Bill Welch answers a question during a meeting of the Nevada Legislative Committee on Health Care Tuesday, July 20, 2010.

Sheila Leslie

Sheila Leslie

CARSON CITY — Perhaps the most significant sign that opinion has shifted on whether patients should know more about Nevada hospitals’ safety records: The Nevada Hospital Association and Nevada State Medical Association supported bills requiring such disclosure during the 2011 Legislature.

Nevada’s health care community “knows it’s a national trend. They know that it was coming,” said Bill Welch, CEO of the Hospital Association.

Indeed, bills that have passed or are likely to pass the 2011 Legislature will give consumers better information to use in selecting hospitals by giving them access to the facilities’ rates of preventable infections and other harm, safety advocates say.

Once consumers begin to choose hospitals based on safety performance, it will create competition to improve their safety records, state Sen. Sheila Leslie, D-Reno, said.

“We feel like we are making significant progress with health care transparency,” said Bobbette Bond, executive director of the Nevada Health Care Policy Group. “These will provide better information for consumers to make choices.”

Sentinel events — unexpected incidents in hospitals that cause injury or the risk thereof — are currently reported to the public as a statewide total, rendering the information useless for consumers seeking to compare facilities’ records. Legislation would require the incidents be reported by facility and hospital, and made available for public review on a state website.

Not everything was a victory. Some bills would have required nursing homes to publicly report incidents. They were taken out of the legislation after the state said it would require more staff time. “It’s something to work on next session,” Leslie said.

The bills were prompted by the Las Vegas Sun’s series “Do No Harm,” which analyzed hospital billing records on file with the state, finding that in 2008 and 2009 patients suffered preventable injuries, life-threatening infections or other harm 969 times in Las Vegas hospitals. In that time, patients also became infected with two types of lethal, drug-resistant “superbugs” in area hospitals 2,010 times.

The series received numerous awards, including being named a finalist for a Pulitzer Prize, journalism’s highest honor.

Here is the status of four bills aimed at increasing health care transparency:

• Senate Bill 209: Requires the state Health Division to publish annual reports on its website comparing “sentinel events” in hospitals in Clark and Washoe counties. The bill defines a sentinel event as an “unexpected occurrence involving facility-acquired infection, death or serious physical or psychological injury.” Status: signed by the governor.

• Senate Bill 264: Would also require the state to report sentinel events by facility. But it would require reporting of the readmissions of patients if the readmission was potentially preventable and related to the initial admission. Money raised through administrative penalties could be used for training to improve the quality of care. Status: in conference committee between Assembly and Senate.

• Senate Bill 338: Requires each medical facility and nursing home that provided care to 25 or more patients to report sentinel events to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention program. The state Health Division would be required to access and publish that information on all medical facilities after Oct. 15, and by nursing homes on Jan. 1. The reports would allow comparisons among facilities. Status: being considered by the Senate; would have to pass the Assembly.

• Senate Bill 339: Requires doctors to inform patients about infections acquired in hospitals. The law mandates that patients, or their families or guardians, be told within five days. There are exceptions, such as when a patient is comatose or suicidal. Status: waiting for the governor’s signature.

• Senate Bill 340: Hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers would be required to report the names of physicians performing surgical procedures and information about those procedures. It would be a step toward linking doctors to potentially adverse medical events. Status: passed Senate; needs approval in the Assembly.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 1 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. More Transparency and accountability is always a good thing. Nurse to Patient Ratios, Staff Infections, Surgical Errors, Pharma Errors, etc..
    Everything should be available on a Public Website.
    Let the Buyer Beware, However allow them to have all the Facts available. If we lost several Hospitals in the process it would be no big deal.