Las Vegas Sun

April 24, 2014

Currently: 73° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Miles from major metro area, rural Ely airport could close

Ely, Nevada

John Mica

John Mica

Harry Reid

Harry Reid

White Pine County Airport in Ely, the nation’s most rural airport to be serviced by commercial flights, survives to a great extent because of a federal program that subsidizes airlines that fly to far-flung areas.

But that survival is in jeopardy. The House has passed a version of the Federal Aviation Administration reauthorization bill that would cap the Transportation Department’s Essential Air Service subsidy at $1,000 per passenger. The only commercial airline that flies into Ely, Great Lakes Airlines, has been getting $3,720 per passenger.

House Transportation Committee Chairman John Mica, a Floridian, described the $1,000 as an “arbitrary” line, but one that makes sense, saves the country about $4 million a year and really only affects commercial service to three airports: Ely, Alamogordo/Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico and Glendive in Montana.

“I couldn’t be more reasonable,” Mica said of the way he structured the bill. “If you ask anyone — anyone in Congress or any person on the street — do you think we should be subsidizing an airline ticket more than $1,000, they’d have to say no.”

The subsidy is intended to help support rural airports that serve few passengers but need to remain part of the grid.

“If there’s anything to the concept of essential air service, it’s embodied in Ely,” said Mike Coster, the airport’s manager.

Ely, population 4,255, is 240 miles from the nearest commercial transport hub.

“It’s the only way to get in and out of Ely other than through private transport,” said James Adams, who manages Ely’s Great Lakes Airlines station. “There is no bus service here. There is no train. There’s not even a taxicab in this town. If you want to get to Ely other than private driving, or out of Ely, you’ve got one option, and that is the airline.”

For years, Ely had been served from Denver — and getting just three to four passengers a day. But on May 15, Great Lakes — which has been Ely’s carrier for almost three years — began daily flights from Las Vegas instead. Passenger count has about doubled since June.

“About half of our passengers are business travelers; they come here for the mines, and as part of the power-line projects,” Coster said. “That’s why we’re getting such an increase, because the engineering companies that were flying to Las Vegas and then driving up here are now able to fly to Ely. And as these industries expand, we expect even more to.” (Other passengers include medical personnel tending to rural patients.)

The federal subsidy is important, boosters say, because it helps bring business and development to an isolated area — more than some of the federally supported rural airports in Alaska.

“I think an awful lot of people, particularly people back East, do not understand how far away things are,” Adams said. “There’s been more activity here related to mining, related to the new power line. There’s even a wind farm being built 30 miles to the east ... Will losing the airport have a significant economic downturn in the entire community? Very definitely.”

The president of Great Lakes Airlines did not immediately return a call to discuss how much of the Ely operating budget is covered by the $1.8 million subsidy, or what the airline intends to do about Ely service if it loses almost three-quarters of that financial aid.

But because the House bill that would cut the subsidy — which Rep. Joe Heck, R-Nev., voted for, and Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., voted against — is not based on the hope of potential, but on numbers quantifying performance, Ely’s operators are “afraid that (these gains) may be too late,” Coster said.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is expected to push hard against the subsidy reduction.

“This is nothing less than an assault by Washington Republicans on already underserved rural communities ... towns like Ely have been hit particularly hard by the recession and are depending on their regional airports to get their economy back on track and create jobs,” said Reid spokesman Zac Petkanas, who characterized the proposed cuts to the airports as “reckless” and “irresponsible.”

The fate of the subsidy is wrapped up in the fate of the FAA reauthorization bill, separate versions of which have been passed by the House and Senate.

That overall fate is testy: The FAA loses its authority to operate Friday, and absent some arrangement to reconcile the bills, it is going to shut down temporarily, meaning thousands of employees will be furloughed.

That won’t affect essential air traffic personnel such as air traffic controllers. And it wouldn’t ground any commercial aircraft, as those are run by private businesses — although it would mean the airlines wouldn’t collect travel taxes while the FAA’s operations were suspended.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 6 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. There is no rational reason why U.S. taxpayers, let alone Nevada taxpayers, should be subsidizing the residents of rural counties for anything. If these people want to have the "pleasure" of living in a rural area, let them pay for every darn penny of their costs...including the full cost of their schools. There is no lawful let alone rational reason why a school district should receive more money, "per head", of state tax dollars than an urban school district in Nevada. These constants subsidizies of these whining jerks in rural Nevada needs to stop.

  2. This is just another reason why I didn't vote for Congressman Heck.

    He has just effectively went on record that he now destroys jobs here in Nevada, not create them, nor create any type of atmosphere that would encourage jobs to come to Nevada. He prefers Nevada go further down into a deep, dark hole...all while he rails and screams that Social Security is "a pyramid scheme" and participates joyfully to block raising the debt ceiling.

    To him, the residents of Nevada are victims waiting to happen. Nothing else is important to him except for party politics. He wants Nevada to go the wrong way. Serious Year Zero stuff.

    I can't wait for the 2012 elections. We need to fix this.

  3. . . .these whining jerks trying to steal the water of rural Nevada. Rural Nevada should not be subsidizing the residents of southern Nevada. If these people want to have the "pleasure" of living where there is no water. . . no rational reason why rural Nevadans should be subsidizing the residents of southern Nevada with the life blood (water) from rural Nevada. . .

  4. Paul....the flaw in your logic is that it is not rural residents subsidizing Las Vegas with water, it is that, once again, LV residents are paying rural residents. we purchased the water rights for a premium from willing sellers. We have gone through the [not yet finished] legal route to establish our ownership of those rights and we will pay for the infrastructure to transfer that water here for our use. As a long-time resident of the rural west I support essential air and I'm not in favor of selling off water rights. The two issues, though, are not really comparable.

  5. No more subsidies; no more grants. Cose the airport! Our Constitution was written ordaining a limited Federal government with enumerated powers only. These are few and defined, mostly external, leaving to the States those which are numerous, indefinite and address the lives and liberties of We the People. The Constitution does NOT permit Congress to create and fund Depts, Services, agencies or even govt.corporations such as Amtrak, the SBA, Soc. Sec. Adm, the RR Retirement Board etc. Nor programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, Soc.Security or bailout funds for businesses too big to fail. All are outside of congress'enumerated powers and unconstitutional. 47% of We the People are of such a mindset that to live at other people's expense is deemed to be a right. It is time we returned to personal responsibility and stop the lawless unconstitutional spending that has resulted in a $14Trillion dollar debt that is increasing at a rate of $4Billion+ a day and affects every aspect of our lives. You cannot battle a debt with more debt!

  6. I know it may make the plight of the rural communities better by saying that the most rural airport is 240 miles away from the nearest hub, but such would be factually incorrect, by over 100%. From Ely to Duluth, MN it is a 112 mile drive.

    I'm from "da range" as in the Iron Range, and it's really simple. Those traveling to the mines would fly to Duluth, and rent a car and take the drive north through the most beautiful land in the country. Were this service to end, there would be no change to the business opportunities in Ely.