Las Vegas Sun

February 1, 2015

Currently: 57° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

The Policy Racket


Joe Heck chooses Nevada interests over party loyalty

Joe Heck

Joe Heck

Yucca Mountain

The U.S. Energy Department plans to store spent nuclear fuel at Yucca Mountain, an extinct volcano about 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas. Launch slideshow »

Rep. Joe Heck broke ranks with Republicans today, voting against a bill that would have made cuts to renewable energy investment programs and provided funds to develop Yucca Mountain as a waste disposal site.

Heck's notable vote came on a bill to appropriate funds for energy and water development for fiscal 2012.

“The cuts contained in this legislation threaten Nevada’s chance to create jobs by becoming America’s leading renewable energy exporter,” Heck said, calling renewable energy research and development “critical to our nation’s energy future.”

“Additionally, this legislation continues funding a project that is unpopular and has long been considered dead, Yucca Mountain, despite other feasible options,” he continued. “We must move past ideas and technology from a bygone era and begin exploring options that will create jobs, and are supported by Nevadans.”

Heck had attempted to divert much of the funding for the nuclear waste disposal project at Yucca mountain earlier this week, through an amendment that would have diverted the $25 million the bill had earmarked for the project to research programs and local oversight activities. He did not offer an amendment to strip an additional $10 million in the bill set aside for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s licensing process.

But when that amendment was knocked down on procedural grounds, it wasn’t clear what Heck would do next.

Democrats in the state leapt on Heck as a sly supporter of screw-Nevada policies.

"With Nevada's economy suffering from the worst economy since the Great Depression, Joe Heck should be focusing on job creation, not spending taxpayer dollars on opening Yucca Mountain or voting to end Medicare in order to continue taxpayer giveaways to big oil companies," Nevada Dems spokesman Zach Hudson said yesterday in a statement.

But now that Heck’s voted against the legislation, it gives him a mixed record that his opponents are going to have a tougher time parsing out for the voters.

Heck and his former Nevada Republican colleague in the House, Dean Heller — who is now in the Senate — had voted earlier this year to support a Republican budget for fiscal 2012 (the one that’s come to be known by the surname of its author, Rep. Paul Ryan), despite the fact that it contained money for Yucca: money that Heller had attempted, unsuccessfully, to kill via a perfunctory amendment that would have stripped all Yucca funding from the bill.

The Ryan bill also made cuts to funding for renewable energy programs.

There are differences between the bills, and the climate surrounding them. The Ryan budget was a measure to fund the whole government, not just selected departments and energy and water-related programs; thus the stakes were much higher. Heck also had a little more cover: back in April, only four Republicans voted against Ryan’s legislation; this time, 21 Republicans refused to back the energy and water appropriations bill.

Voting against energy and water bills isn't all that novel for a Nevada Republican: Heller did the same with the energy and water bills that appeared before the House between fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2010 (there was no separate energy and water appropriations bill in fiscal 2011). The last two years, in budgets passed under the Obama administration, Yucca mountain funding wasn't an issue; the entire Nevada House delegation voted together against the fiscal 2008 energy and water bill.

Heck's shift on the energy and water bill likely won't protect him from Democratic cross-hairs over votes he already took on the Ryan budget (which is more tied to the bill's handling of Medicare than anything else, but Yucca funding was a part of it).

He might benefit a bit from favorable timing: the last vote he took on Yucca and renewable energy was to vote down a bill that continued to fund them, while the last vote Heller took on the subject was to give the Ryan budget a second endorsement, a vote he said he was "proud" to take.

But citing Yucca and renewable energy isn't enough, Democrats are saying, especially when Heck also voted against an amendment that would have diverted another $24 million from fossil energy research programs and put it toward renewable energy efficiency programs -- which as Heck said, are "critical" to Nevada jobs (which has negligible oil).

There may not be another opportunity. This is likely the last vote Heck will have to take on the Yucca issue in a while. Odds are that the House’s fiscal 2012 appropriations bills won’t make it past the Senate, but the House probably won’t independently consider another set of appropriations bills before the fiscal year ends on September 30 either; and if they consider a compromise package, it will have been pre-combed by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid for all traces of Yucca funding. Reid is also unlikely to present final appropriation legislation that includes Yucca funding to the Senate.

Nevada’s Democrat in the House, Shelley Berkley, who is also vehemently against funding Yucca and vocally in favor of investing in renewable energy, voted against the House’s energy and water appropriations bill, and for the amendment.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 7 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Thank you Joe for voting for renewable energy.

  2. The party bosses routinely figure in these "Home Town Votes" and give dispensations to vote against measures. With a Republican majority in the house, this amounts to not news. Let's see if Joe votes against medicare again!

  3. I don't agree with Heck on 99% of everything, but kudos to him for putting the people before party.

  4. Woo hoo, an elected official did his job. Isn't it an incredibly sad commentary that a politician doing his job and representing his consituents is so unusual that it makes news?

    We, as voters, should be OUTRAGED every single time a politician chooses party loyalty over the interests of his constituency. But these days, we accept it as the norm. Shame on us.

    Then again, most voters choose party loyalty over even their own personal interests.

  5. This RINO must be defeated in the primary. He did not choose Nevada interests over party loyalty, but instead allowed polling data to guide his vote. True leaders change ill-informed opinions by doing what's truly best for our State; not yield to ill-informed opinions whenever presented with an opportunity for personal political advancement. Joe Heck is simply an opportunist. He's not a true leader!

  6. Joe Egan, ya need a trip out of town. You need to visit scientists, not politicians. (though, I am sure you would rather form your opinion from a political base.)

  7. I am amazed that Heck went against the party. But, he has to continue it and that is debatable. Shelley Berkly in the senete and democrats in the house are the only hope. I believe in the end, Nevadans and the US will see that the neuclear industry has to find a way to go from fission to fusion. Green energy must replace coal, oil, and neuclear. That unfortunately for us; because they won't; will put them out of business. We must become more local in our lives. Food, clothing, selter, work, and play must be more localized. Until that happens, we are at the mercy of fossil and neuclear.