Las Vegas Sun

January 27, 2015

Currently: 62° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Tax initiative could unite liberal activists, mining industry

Sun Coverage

For liberal activists who have been fighting the mining industry for years, it seemed the forces had finally aligned.

Thanks to record gold prices and a shift in public opinion, it appeared they would be able to close some of the industry’s generous tax loopholes, increase regulatory oversight of mining and eliminate its power of eminent domain.

The activists went head-to-head with an army of mining lobbyists who spend heavily grooming legislators to vote their way. And on several key battles — much to their surprise in some cases — the liberal activists won.

But now, as they plot how to carry on the fight, some are considering an alliance with their enemy. They are weighing joining forces with mining and other industries to sell voters on a broad-based business tax, instead of a ballot initiative targeted solely at the mining industry.

Mining’s opponents frequently threatened lawmakers that they would simply go to the ballot if the Legislature didn’t raise the industry’s taxes. They envisioned it would be simple to gather support from the public, which is largely convinced that the booming industry isn’t sharing in the economic hardship, to back such a ballot question.

But these activists also believe that Nevada’s wobbly tax structure — which, ironically, is wobbly because it relies too heavily on taxes from a single industry — needs permanent help in the form of a broad-based business tax.

Some in their ranks believe putting both on the ballot at the same time would kill both efforts.

So which do they want more?

“If (a mining tax increase) were on the ballot it would pass, hands down,” said Bob Fulkerson, executive director of the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada, which has been at the forefront of the fight.

“But if it were on the ballot with another tax initiative, the advertising blitz that would be done against it could doom both to failure. I don’t think anybody wants that on their conscience when Nevada is hurting so bad.”

Perhaps more important, Fulkerson reasoned, they are going to need mining’s help to get a broad-based tax increase passed. “We are going to need all hands on deck to get a broad-based initiative through,” he said.

The mining industry has long supported a broad-based tax increase. To help stave off industry-specific attacks, its lobbyists worked to win the support of key Republicans for the Democrats’ tax increase last session.

They failed, with many industry insiders believing the ballot is the only place such an increase will be successful. And some say liberal activists will need to be part of the coalition pushing the tax increase.

It would be an uneasy alliance for both sides and would fall far short of a truce.

“You have to understand that the motivation for most of these liberal advocacy groups is not to tax mining to fund government; their mission is to tax mining out of existence,” said Pete Ernaut, a lobbyist that used to represent mining and who is expected to be instrumental in building a coalition of business industries to back a broad-based business tax ballot initiative. “They won’t stop until they stop mining in Nevada.”

Fulkerson also made it clear that any cooperation wouldn’t mean he and his allies would back off the industry the next time the Legislature convenes. They want to continue tightening the industry’s tax deductions and working to eliminate the mining tax’s constitutional protection.

“We are still going to be out there with both barrels loaded in 2013,” Fulkerson said. “Our enthusiasm is not waning at all on that. But a ballot proposal in 2012, we’re probably much more pragmatic.”

Not all liberal activists are convinced that having both questions on the ballot would “doom them both to failure.” And the thought of joining a coalition with the mining industry has caused some conflict among liberal groups.

“There’s a disconnect still on the left side of the aisle with respect to mining,” said Erin Neff, executive director of ProgressNow. “Progressives are like, ‘Tax the hell out of them, they deserve it.’ Labor, not so much. They see the potential for jobs.

“I don’t really know at the end of the day if we are going to get there on mining.”

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 6 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Both the Assembly and State Senate passed bills as the first step in placing an amendment on the ballot that would remove the protection for mining from the State Constitution this session. WHAT HAPPENED TO THOSE BILLS?

    If I could have only a ballot measure to remove protection from mining or one to mandate a new tax structure, I would choose the former.

    A broad-based tax structure can be implemented at any time by the legislature. But tax protection for mining (and the rape of the Nevada taxpayers) can only be stopped by the amendment process, which takes a *lot* more time.

    Get mining on the same playing field as everyone else, then look at what the field rules are.

  2. How can Nevada politicians change tax laws when they are unwilling to protect working shift miners?

    For failing to help managment harass a Mexican tire man at Round mountain Gold Corp.(Kinross-Barrick) Management used safety issues(a reported cab fire in a moving haul truck)and turned it into a personnel issue to terminate employment, NV Mine Safety and Training Section and MSHA and Nevada Governor refuse to investigate as they continue to say its a labor issue.

    When did false safety records become personnel issues ALLOWED to be covered up by Mining oversight?

    Mining Corps. in Nevada are corrupt from the Governors office to safety over sight.

    How can politicians change tax statutes when they can not even protect a working miner?

    PRupp B125 SP NV 89047

  3. Anjeanette, you should know better than this. A "broad based business tax" will not help Nevada's "wobbly tax" structure. Business taxes are LESS STABLE than our gaming tax (and this newspaper has even reported on it).

    Ernaut, Faulkerson and Neff seem to be just twisting arms and threatening people at this point. I'm not sure what Ernaut's angle is but Faulkerson and Neff just want more spending period and it has nothing to do with creating a stable tax structure.

  4. Yeah, just attacking the mining companies to get more tax money wasn't sufficient for the liberals. So it's no surprise that they now want to expand their tax insanity to all businesses.

  5. Tanker 1975 > School is out(NV legislature) and the turd birds (legislators have flown the coop) Once again the NV legislature left town counting their gifts from the Nevada Mining industry while leaving ALL Nevadans holding an empty bag. . .including miners that continue to wait for lawful timely formal complain(s) to be investigated by Nevada's Big Mining's partner in crime NV Mine Safety and Training Section. Why does Nevada have Mine Safety Oversight. . . good question as there is absolutely no benefit FROM NV Mine Safety Training Section to working miners that file lawful formal complaints for injuries suffered on Nevada's TOO BIG TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE MINING OPERATIONS in Nevada???

    PRupp B125 SP NV 89047

  6. Don't make it a TAX INITIATIVE make it a Constitutional Amendment that REMOVES MINING from the State Constitution! Then TAX IT!