Las Vegas Sun

July 23, 2014

Currently: 89° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Attorney general overturns RTC board’s vote on bus contract

Updated Friday, July 8, 2011 | 8:24 p.m.

The Regional Transportation Commission will have to reconsider its bus operations contract again after the Nevada attorney general ruled the commission’s approval of the controversial contract wasn’t legal.

The commission’s board voted 4-3 to approve the contract with First Transit in May, with one of the board’s members absent. Even though that was a majority of the members present, four votes are not a majority of the entire board, as required by state law.

Veolia Transportation, the company that operates the RTC’s bus system but put in a higher bid than First Transit in efforts to keep the contract, protested the decision, pointing out that state law requires all boards made up of elected officials to take action by a majority vote of all members, present or not.

Attorneys for the commission and First Transit said the RTC board didn’t have to meet that requirement, since the RTC wasn’t specifically included in the law and one board member, the director of the Nevada Transportation Department, is not elected.

The board voted in June on the protest filed by Veolia, but failed to get enough votes to either accept or reject the protest, which is essentially the same as rejecting it.

However, Clark County Commissioner Larry Brown, who is chairman of the RTC board, asked that the commission get an opinion from the attorney general’s office.

The RTC received an answer from the Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto’s office Friday afternoon, declaring the vote invalid, RTC spokeswoman Tracy Bower said.

The letter, addressed to Brown and signed by Senior Deputy Attorney General George Taylor, says the office disagrees with the RTC legal counsel’s interpretation of the law.

“Quite clearly and regardless of any other arguments, RTC’s 4-3 vote on May 19 failed to adhere to legislative intent,” the letter says.

In addition, the attorney general said that the RTC must rescind the vote by end of the statutory 60-day limitations period, which ends July 18 in order to avoid action by the office against the RTC.

The RTC said it will comply with the request, but it was not sure exactly what its process would be. “We’ll take appropriate action to comply with the AG’s opinion,” Bower said.

The board is scheduled to meet Thursday – four days before the deadline – but the issue isn’t currently on the posted agenda. It could be added, but the open meeting law would require the amended agenda to be posted by 9 a.m. Monday, Bower said.

In addition to the deadline to reverse the vote, the decision puts pressure on the commission to act quickly since the current contract expires in September.

Veolia has indicated it would work with the RTC to continue providing service until a new permanent contract is established, but that would likely require the RTC to cut bus service since its budget for next year is based on the lower cost contract with First Transit.

In the previous RTC meeting, Brown and others said it was likely that the contract would end up in court, with either First Transit or Veolia suing if the other was awarded the contract.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 1 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. This doesn't surprise me one iota. MV has been in quite a but of trouble up here in the North and quite frankly hasn't done a very good job with the systems they manage.