Las Vegas Sun

January 28, 2015

Currently: 59° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Nevada Territory

School district warns of consequences if state redirects bond money

Clark County School District officials protested Gov. Brian Sandoval's plan to redirect money for school construction and maintenance, warning that the proposal would require the school district to refinance bonds, increasing long-term costs, or be forced to raise property taxes in order to repay its debt.

Jeff Weiler, chief financial officer of the Clark County School District, told the Legislature's committee reviewing the budget that the district needs the $411 million it has to repay debt service on money raised for capital projects over the next five to seven years.

He was unable to estimate how much money it would cost the district to restructure its debt.

The Sandoval administration proposed sweeping a total of $425 million in funds from 12 school districts across the state and transfer it to schools operating costs, according to the budget Sandoval released on Monday. About $300 million of that would come from Clark County, and put into that district's schools.

Weiler said there has been a misunderstanding between the school district and Sandoval's administration about whether the district would need to refinance the debt anyway.

Sandoval's budget balanced without raising taxes, but did shift some resources around to lessen cuts. Sandoval's cut to K-12 schools of over 9 percent assumed that capital money could be transferred to operating costs.

To do that, Sandoval's administration proposed lowering the amount of cash reserves school districts would be required to maintain, from 12 months of reserves to six months. Budget director Andrew Clinger maintained that Clark County School District said it would not be able to maintain a reserve of 12 months, even if the state didn’t take any money.

Dale Erquiaga, senior adviser to Sandoval, said that the administration had been told by Clark County that it would have to restructure its debt anyway.

Regardless of additional costs, though, he said "it's still more important to get that money to children in the classrooms" than having that money for maintenance.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 2 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. There is no reason to refinance the debt (though they do it all the time) and there is no reason to build new schools - you guys already built 12 since the recession started. Student population hasn't grown.

  2. Nevada forgot to listen to the State of the Union Address - 8 years of giving tax breaks to the top income brackets to 'create jobs' and all that is created are hedge fund managers and billionaires. The fix? Keep doing the same thing.

    Keep doing the same thing over and over, and expect a different result...a commonly defined characteristic.