AP Photo, Cathleen Allison
Tuesday, Feb. 15, 2011 | 2 a.m.
- Tax proponents turn to unemployed for support (2-13-2011)
- Labor leaders: Tax hike among options to boost construction jobs (2-11-2011)
- Mothers make plea for state to save early childhood program (2-11-2011)
- Sandoval’s budget relies on at least one fee increase (2-10-2011)
- If lawmakers unwilling to raise taxes, others are ready to take the initiative (2-9-2011)
- Committees ‘not afraid of anything,’ even the T-word — taxes (2-9-2011)
- Four state budget scenarios — none pretty (2-6-2011)>
- State budget plan heavy on cuts, light on solutions (1-25-2011)
Beyond the Sun
Democrats in the Legislature have railed against the effect of budget cuts on schools and universities, people with disabilities and people without jobs. But they have stayed conspicuously silent on one of Gov. Brian Sandoval’s cuts — his proposed 5 percent whack at state workers’ pay.
That’s an ominous sign for all public-sector employees in Nevada — not only the 30,000 state workers, but the other 100,000 state and local government employees.
The Legislature has no direct control over most employees of school districts, higher education and various local governments. But lawmakers’ actions on state workers and local budgets will almost inevitably roll down to those employees.
State workers protested in front of the Legislature on Monday, claiming they will shoulder a disproportionate share of the budget burden if Sandoval has his way. The event, organized by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, which represents state workers, drew about 50 people.
Speakers, including Senate Majority Leader Steven Horsford, praised state workers, said increases to tax revenue should be considered, but none directly opposed Sandoval’s 5 percent proposal.
Since the beginning of the Great Recession, public employees have seen varied effects on pay and benefits. Below is a guide to what has happened, and what might happen.
Legislators and former Gov. Jim Gibbons decided to go ahead with a scheduled cost of living increase of 4 percent in 2008 despite warnings of a downturn.
Since then, state workers have suffered the most from falling tax revenue.
Legislators replaced Gibbons’ proposed 6 percent cut with a monthly furlough day equivalent to a 4.6 percent pay cut although pensions are held harmless. Employee costs for retirement and health benefits have risen also.
Judicial employees didn’t take furloughs; legislative employees are not taking furloughs during the four-month session.
Sandoval proposed a 5 percent cut for state workers, suspending step increases and merit pay. The pay cut, which would replace the furloughs, would also affect pensions, helping the state save about $90 million.
State Sen. James Settelmeyer, R-Minden, whose district includes Carson City, said “I still think furloughs are more appropriate, but that might not happen.”
Some university employees, such as maintenance staff and administrative assistants, had to take the same furloughs as state workers. Nontenured professors also took a furlough.
But tenured faculty were protected by contracts. The administration asked these employees to take an “equivalent” of 4.6 percent by increasing their workload. How these are done can vary and there have been complaints about inequity among higher education faculty.
Dale Erquiaga, the governor’s senior adviser, said Sandoval has received a number of complaints about tenured higher education faculty being spared furloughs.
Sorry, professors. The Board of Regents this summer passed a new rule: The governing body can cut tenured faculty pay up to 6 percent if the state orders a similar cut to its employees. Nevada System of Higher Education Chancellor Dan Klaich, who worked with faculty leadership to pass the regulation, has warned the system is in danger of losing its best professors.
K-12 (teachers, administrators, support staff)
There are 17 school districts in Nevada. Each bargains separately with employee associations.
In 2009, after the Legislature passed its budget, the Clark County Education Association approved a contract that maintained “step increases,” raises based on years of service and education. Critics said the union was choosing its members’ pay over students.
Last year, Clark County agreed to a freeze in most step increases.
Washoe County educators also froze most step increases and took two furlough days.
Starting with Sandoval, and echoed by legislators, there is growing drumbeat for teachers and other school employees to take some type of pay cut. Sandoval’s administration says 70 percent of the cuts it has proposed to school districts could be absorbed through employee pay or benefits.
Clark County School Board President Carolyn Edwards said it was difficult to know what kind of concessions the district will ask for until it sees what the Legislature passes.
“I’d like to see all our employee groups make concessions,” she said. “What those are we don’t know yet.”
She said if unions don’t make salary concessions, a bigger part of the budget will be layoffs.
Local governments have a mishmash of employee associations and unions with which they negotiate. Employee groups in Clark County and the cities have made some concessions, suspending or lessening pay raises or cost of living adjustments.
When business groups such as the Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce complain about public-employee pay, they are not talking about state workers, or even teachers. It’s primarily local government employees who rank among the best paid in the nation compared with other states.
The abuse of sick leave by some Clark County firefighters is just the latest sign pointing to some sort of reckoning for local government employees. As the state prepares to take money from counties, local government employees will feel the squeeze as contracts are negotiated.
Why the difference between the state and local government employees? Local government employees have collective bargaining rights. If there’s an impasse in negotiating a contract, it goes to an arbitrator.
“Obviously, what happens at the Legislature will affect local governments,” said Rusty McCallister, president of the Professional Firefighters of Nevada.