Las Vegas Sun

December 21, 2014

Currently: 48° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Damon Political Report

AG accuses conservative operative Chuck Muth of violating campaign laws

Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto has filed a civil complaint against a political organization run by well-known conservative operative Chuck Muth, accusing him of violating campaign finance laws by failing to report money he spent attacking Assembly Speaker John Oceguera, D-Las Vegas, in last year’s election.

Muth’s political non-profit group, Citizen Outreach, could be subject to $10,000 in fines for failing to file contribution and expense reports associated with two mailers it sent last year.

Masto filed the complaint after an investigation by Secretary of State Ross Miller into allegations by a Las Vegas man that Muth had violated campaign finance laws.

The mailers attack Oceguera, who recently retired from the North Las Vegas Fire Department, for so-called double-dipping because of his dual public salaries.

One flier accused Oceguera of having “gamed the system to retire at age 48 with $135,000 salary plus benefits.”

Another attacks Oceguera for “sponsoring trivial bills, voting for tax hikes and enriching himself as a public employee.”

“The Fiddling Flyer and the Nice Work Flyer constitute express advocacy because there is no reasonable interpretation of these communications other than an appeal to vote for or against a clearly identified candidate on the ballot,” Deputy Attorney General Kevin Bensen wrote in the complaint against Muth.

Muth acknowledged he never filed contribution and expense reports, but said he is not required to under state campaign finance laws because the mailers didn’t specifically say “elect” or “defeat” any particular candidate.

Under federal campaign finance law, such words constitute “express advocacy” and would trigger reporting requirements. Muth argues that standard applies at the state level as well.

“What they’re saying is that what has been traditionally known as educational mailers talking about issues are express advocacy,” Muth said. “That is a stretch on their part and we are going to fight it.”

Political non-profit groups have long relied on that legal standard to skirt reporting requirements on both the state and federal level.

“In my mind this is just pure harassment,” Muth said.

Deputy Secretary of State Scott Gilles, who investigated the complaint, said he can’t comment on pending litigation.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 3 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. "In my mind this is just pure harassment," Muth said....

    Yeah, right, Chuckie!
    Good one!
    "Poor, poor, pitiful me"!

    "Muth acknowledged he never filed contribution and expense reports, but said he is not required to under state campaign finance laws because the mailers didn't specifically say "elect" or "defeat" any particular candidate"...

    You sneaky Devil, Chuckie!
    Trying to skirt the rule of law, aren't cha?

    "Citizen Outreach" is code for "Big-Time Tea Nuts", and Chuckie is the Big Nut!!!

  2. chuckie says..... oh crap....

  3. Mr. Muth stated: "Muth acknowledged he never filed contribution and expense reports, but said he is not required to under state campaign finance laws because the mailers didn't specifically say "elect" or "defeat" any particular candidate." AND "Under federal campaign finance law, such words constitute "express advocacy" and would trigger reporting requirements. Muth argues that standard applies at the state level as well."

    Mr Muth is correct, and Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto appears to be using her office to sue Mr. Muth in another game of Democratic hard ball smear politics. I think it is about time that Ms. Masto be charged criminally for her illegal and political use of her office.