Las Vegas Sun

January 30, 2015

Currently: 58° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account


Clark County School District sues teachers’ union over spending

Facing steep budget cuts, the Clark County School District is suing the local teachers' union in hopes of avoiding a deadlock over certain spending reductions.

The district filed suit Friday in Clark County District Court in Las Vegas against the Clark County Education Association and is asking the court to decide an issue over increased retirement plan contributions.

The suit says the district's employees participate in the state Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) and that on Dec. 3 PERS notified the district that on July 1 the employees' contribution rate must increase 1.125 percent.

The lawsuit says the increase must be paid in lieu of an equivalent salary increase or be counterbalanced by an equivalent reduction in the employees' salaries.

This cost to employees will be $14 million and it's actually paid by the district, the lawsuit said.

"This amount equates to approximately 200 full-time district employee positions," the lawsuit noted, adding the district and the union are negotiating a new contract for the 2011-12 school year while the Legislature weighs deep spending reductions.

The lawsuit seeks a court order "declaring that in the event the Clark County Education Association and the district are unable to agree on the source of the employees' portion of the PERS increase by 1.125 percent by July 1, the district is required to abide by (state law)" providing for a salary cut to cover the PERS increase.

Such a court order would be superseded by the final determination of the contract by agreement or an arbitrator's decision.

The union has not yet responded to the suit.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 1 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Seems to me that this is another example of posturing and maneuvering [sp?] in order to influence bargaining. Teachers [of which I am one] are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Does the agreement address this issue? If yes, then the agreement provides for a remedy. If no, then it is subject to bargaining as it is an issue of compensation.

    The District is getting ahead of itself by trying to lock in contract terms under their draconian assumptions. If, and I'll concede it is a big "if", the revenue situation changes for the better I believe it unlikely that the District would willingly give back what teachers conceded.