Deal reached allowing loaded guns in Nevada state parks
Wednesday, Sept. 22, 2010 | 11:20 a.m.
Related Document (.pdf)
People who can lawfully possess firearms can now take their loaded guns into Nevada's state parks under a legal agreement approved Tuesday.
Attorneys for the Nevada Attorney General's office, representing the state park system, agreed in a lawsuit stipulation that the parks will stop enforcing a law that critics said generally barred park visitors from possessing loaded firearms -- even for self defense.
The agreement is valid for one year and will give the parks system a chance to amend its regulations so they comply with the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment right to possess firearms, said James Manley, an attorney for the Mountain States Legal Foundation who was involved in the litigation.
The agreement came after the Colorado-based legal foundation filed suit in federal court in Nevada in July challenging a law that allowed visitors to bring guns into state parks, but only if they were unloaded and locked in vehicles.
Exceptions under the code protect gun owners carrying the weapon in conformity with a state concealed weapons permit or gun owners hunting in an authorized area.
The plaintiff, Idaho outdoorsman Al Baker, didn't fall under those exceptions and said in the suit he was threatened with six months' jail time if he fired his gun in Nevada state parks -- even in self defense.
"The Supreme Court’s ruling that the Second Amendment applies to the states via the 14th Amendment makes it clear that the Nevada law is unconstitutional and must be stricken," William Perry Pendley, president of the Mountain States Legal Foundation, said in a July statement announcing the lawsuit.
In announcing the lawsuit, Pendley cited the U.S. Supreme Court's June 28 ruling striking down a Chicago ordinance banning handgun ownership and finding "the right to keep and bear arms [is] among those fundamental rights necessary to our system of ordered liberty."
A spokesman for the Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, parent agency of the Nevada Division of State Parks, today said the agency didn't have any comment on the litigation. State parks in the Las Vegas area are the Valley of Fire, Spring Mountain Ranch and Old Las Vegas Mormon Fort.
The agreement was filed in court Sept. 14 by attorneys for the plaintiff and the state and was signed off on Tuesday by U.S. District Judge Edward C. Reed Jr. in Reno.
The agreement said the Parks Division's planned rulemaking "may result in changes to Nevada Administrative Code .. that could cure defendants’ alleged deprivation of the right to keep and bear arms guaranteed by the United States Constitution."
The rulemaking may include a chance for the public to comment on the issue.
Manley said the agreement means action in the lawsuit will be put on hold for a year to give the state time to amend the code. If the code isn't amended to the satisfaction of the plaintiff, the lawsuit could continue.
The only people not allowed to carry weapons in state parks now are those who are barred from carrying such weapons anywhere in Nevada -- for instance because of a criminal conviction or court order, he said.
The Mountain States Legal Foundations says it is a nonprofit, public interest law firm dedicated to individual liberty, the right to own and use property, limited and ethical government and economic freedom.
Discussion: 1 comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Photos: Olivia Culpo, 20, of Rhode Island is crowned 2012 Miss USA at Planet Hollywood
- US Navy hopes stealth ship answers a rising China
- Learning about Electric Daisy Carnival fans will help Las Vegas court them
- On the horizon: A quick look at projects poised to shape downtown
- Clark PG Kentrell Washington heading to Hofstra basketball







This is interesting because the Nevada Attorney General is basically agreeing that a state regulation must fall aside because of the Heller and McDonald decisions. In Wisconsin, a local prosecutor has done much the same and has stated that he will not prosecute people for carrying open or concealed loaded guns (assuming there is no crime committed). But many other local politicians and law enforcement are continuing to enforce even more questionable laws in the face of Heller and McDonald. I suppose many of them are going to get handed their you know whats in federal court. Nevada simply avoided that.
Can state employees carry guns in state parks while on duty?
Stupid.
"Can state employees carry guns in state parks while on duty?"
Probably the sworn officers can, but there are probably work related regulations against the others doing it. Maybe we should change that too! :)
We can debate the Second Amendment until we are blue in the face, but why in the world would anyone need to carry a gun to the Mormon Fort? I was there today. Is somebody afraid that the exhibit will attack him?
Michael Green, do you really expect criminals who wish to do you harm will plan their attack where they will be easily caught, discouraged, or challenged? No, they will do it when the opportunity presents itself and there is a high likelyhood of success. Therefore, we, as self reliant citizens, dont have the ability to decide when we should prepare to protect ourselves. We must maintain our ability to defend ourselves at all times.
Chunky says:
We carry because we never know when some "West Point Grad" who appears to be the epitome of success standing next to you is jacked on steroids and has a toxicity profile of prescription narcotics in his system that would kill a horse.
Crazy people do crazy things like ignore the orders of armed police officers and then point a gun at them.
These criminals don't just show up in back alleys, they show up in Costco, churches, schools, businesses, military bases, courthouses, airports, airplanes and yes even state parks and old forts.
That's what Chunky thinks!
This really is great news. I was recently out at Valley of Fire State Park, and wanted to book a group campground space for an upcoming event, and after seeing their 'no firearms' policy, decided against it. When I run down the reasons I carry my firearm, it's actually a pretty short list.
1. To aid in protecting myself and my family from grave bodily injury or death.
2. There is no #2.
While it is very unlikely that I would need it in my day to day life, I carry it for that rare occasion where it might make the difference.
When going out to the wilderness, however, that likelyhood probably increases tenfold. It seems that, all too often, exactly the places that you really SHOULD carry, are exactly the places you can't carry. (*cough* CSN Cheyenne Campus *cough*)