Las Vegas Sun

February 12, 2012

Currently: 56° | Complete forecast | Log in

Ruling likely means 19 laid-off county workers will get jobs back

County will have to pay up to $2 million in back salary

Thursday, Sept. 9, 2010 | 2 a.m.

Chris Giunchigliani

Chris Giunchigliani

Steve Sisolak

Steve Sisolak

A state board’s decision will likely force Clark County to rehire 19 workers laid off in 2009 plus pay them up to nearly $2 million in back salary. And it could result in other employees losing their jobs to offset the back-pay expense.

The Service Employees International Union, which represents 9,000 county workers, filed a complaint with the Employee Management Relations Board claiming the county engaged in “prohibited practices” when it targeted the workers. Neither the county nor union has seen the order, but both have been informed that the SEIU won the case by a 2-1 board vote.

Like most union contracts, the SEIU’s agreement protects the most senior county employees from layoffs — meaning the last person hired is the first to be let go. However, the contract gives the county the right in 8 percent of the layoffs to keep a newer employee if that person is deemed more valuable than a more senior worker “for the continued operation of the county.”

But the union’s attorneys convinced the board that those newer employees whose jobs were saved offered nothing more than the older employees they had displaced.

“We didn’t think the evidence showed that the employees who were retained were more skilled,” said attorney Jonathan Cohen of the Pasadena, Calif., firm Rothner, Segall & Greenstone, which represents the union.

The laid-off employees were in the first of three rounds of layoffs as the county struggled to balance its budget amid severely declining tax revenue. In that round, 48 people were targeted: 23 accepted transfers to different county jobs, six took early retirement and the 19 were laid off.

The 19 worked in the development services office, which is supported by fees collected for plan certifications and other development-related duties. When the recession curtailed development, the county decided the employees were no longer needed.

County officials expect they must hire back the employees because the union complaint had asked to “make whole” the workers.

Amber Lopez-Lasater, a union spokeswoman, called the victory “bittersweet,” because bringing them back means other county workers may be laid off to offset the cost of back pay.

“But the bottom line is, unfortunately, the county needs to be held responsible for its actions, and it is our primary responsibility to ensure contracts are implemented properly,” she said.

County Commissioner Chris Giunchigliani agreed, saying “we should have followed the process correctly.”

Lopez-Lasater said the decision won’t affect county layoffs that came later because the union thinks they were handled properly.

Commissioner Steve Sisolak said not only will the county rehire the 19 workers, it must find an estimated $1.8 million to compensate them for the 14 months they were jobless. That amount could be reduced if unemployment compensation is subtracted from the total, he added.

“It’s unfortunate, but we don’t have the surplus money or reserves to pay these costs,” he said. “It has to be made with other means.”

Nick DiArchangel, SEIU spokesman, said the union was obligated to make the complaint, even though the potential consequences “are regrettable.”

“But the fact of the matter is, the county is the one who brought this on and we certainly couldn’t ignore it,” he said. “If we ignored this now, what would happen down the line? This had to be addressed.”

Discussion: 3 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Seniority and job tenure policies have got to go. Besides, government workers should NOT be unionized - that leads to abuse.

  2. Wait a minute, do those guys have to pay back the unemployment benefits they recieved over that time?

  3. A must read on why Nevada's public employee union salaries are bankrupting the state: http://npri.org/publications/bound-and-g...

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.

Most Popular

  • Viewed
  • Discussed
  • E-mailed
  • Facebook