Las Vegas Sun

June 4, 2012

Currently: 98° | Complete forecast | Log in

LETTER TO THE EDITOR:

Burning the Quran is not a free speech right

Thursday, Sept. 9, 2010 | 2:02 a.m.

I find the proposed “Burn a Quran Day” to be morally repugnant, even though I am not religious. That said, I have to ask whether it is an exercise of free speech or in fact something that infringes on society’s (and hence my) right to a peaceful existence?

The act of publicly burning the Quran is an open invitation for violent retaliation by some groups.

Does Pastor Terry Jones (the organizer of the burning) have the right to issue such an invitation on my behalf? If not, then I must conclude that such an act is not constitutionally protected “free speech.” If it is known that certain actions will be the direct cause of harm to others, even if done by a third party, then those actions are intolerable.

Any reasonable person can recognize that the public burning of the Quran will ignite strong emotions in Muslims. It is possibly the most insulting act that one can perform and will result in some acts of violent retaliation.

This kind of deliberate provocation with the foreknowledge of and reckless disregard for the harm that will follow must not be tolerated by any rational person or by a government that promotes the general welfare of its citizenry.

Some government agency should step in and prevent Pastor Jones from going forward with this plan. Any First Amendment issues can be argued in court, but this is not protected free speech. The government must perform its legitimate function of protecting the rights of all citizens.

Discussion: 14 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. I find the burning of the American Flag to be repugnant too. But courts ruled time and again, it's protected Freedom of Speech.

    If you want some government agency to step in to prevent Pastor Jones from burning the Koran, just because we find it to be a provocation, then should we ask some government agency to step in to prevent a mosque from being built at Ground Zero because some of us find that deliberately provocative?

  2. Conservatives are being hypocrites again. Time and again they have told us that they are not opposed to Islam per se in opposing the "Ground Zero Mosque," rather they are acting out of concern for the sensibilities of those who lost family members on 9-11 (even the Moslem families). Now they tell us sensibilities be dam*ed, this pastor has the right to burn a Qoran.

    This liberal has no such issues. They all should go ahead and do as they please with their own property. My advice to offended Moslems (not to mention Jews, Christians, and other religious people offended by this perversion of Jesus' teachings) is let this idiot have his day. Remember what your mothers used to tell you: reacting only encourages him.

  3. xtra,

    Something you are forgetting to mention is that those bibles where printed in Pashto and Dari languages. They where not permitted to be imported or passed out in Afghanistan. A church in the U.S. sent them to a solider on a U.S. Military base. Even the chaplin of that base advised the solider that passing them out would endanger the lives of the others on that base and that solider agreed they needed to be removed.

    Don't cherry pick just parts of the facts to try to make your story look better. Expose the whole story.

  4. It is not that burning a Quran is not free speech but the organized, public nature of the event itself, "International Burn-a-Quran Day", that is intentionally being done to provoke and incite.

    So far as I know, SCOTUS has ruled only one time that an action was not protected, back in 1919 in Schenck v. United States. This resulted in the "clear and present danger" doctrine. Since then that has been modified several times to what we have to today that basically allows everything except inciting to riot.

    I think that the underlying basis for Jones' planned actions falls into that category.

  5. Again, it is not that Jones can not burn a book, but the intent and concept behind "International Burn a Quran Day" that is the issue.

    It is being done as a deliberate provocation with intent to incite. THAT is not protected free speech.

  6. Just out on CNN, Jones is canceling burn, he is going to go to NY to talk to the Imam there.

  7. The news just now coming out is going to create a problem.

    According to CNN, during a live press conference, Pastor Jones has said he is canceling the event on Saturday and will instead fly to NY and speak with Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf.

    Jones claims that Rauf has agreed to move the location of the mosque.

    We need a lot more details if that claim is true.

    However, I think this sets a bad precedent. Many will hail Jones for achieving this. But it is in fact an endorsement of what to me seems to be a terrorist act.

  8. I applaud the Imam for talking with Jones. It is not known whether or not the Imam has actually agreed to move the project, but it seems he will talk about it.

    At this point I only hope that this does not inspire more people to seek solutions like Jones' by threats of inciting violence. I know that several people here will praise Jones for his actions now. But this seems much too close to blackmail.

    I still condemn Jones' intended action and the intent behind it.

  9. Lots of conflicting stories coming out now from NY an Florida. It's time to wait and see what is really going on.

  10. "3. This pastor has a right to do what he wants as long as he doesn't hurt any one." = fremmasmind

    That was the point of the letter.

    Jones' planned action was in fact intended to cause harm, either directly or indirectly.

  11. Pastor Jones was organizing a public display with the knowledge that violence would be a result of his actions. He was making a call for action by naming it the "International Burn a Quran" day.

    This, in my opinion, is not only a reckless disregard for the safety of others but is tantamount to inciting a riot and a desire for such to happen. That goes far beyond someone saying they are upset with the government by burning a flag.

  12. fremmasmind,

    I agree, we have done more than enough to upset them already, but why add to it? Just because we had a president who was an idiot does that give citizens the right to be just as stupid?

  13. I have found a couple of references that refer to Imam Rauf as a naturalized citizen, but have not found a definitive source yet.

  14. fremmasmind,

    This article from aolnews seems to be a trustworthy source that says that Imam Rauf is a naturalized citizen: http://www.aolnews.com/surge-desk/articl...

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.