Las Vegas Sun

June 4, 2012

Currently: 98° | Complete forecast | Log in

SUN EDITORIAL:

A Tea Party takeover?

Candidates like to say what they are against, but what do they stand for?

Sunday, Sept. 5, 2010 | 2:01 a.m.

The Tea Party movement celebrated the recent Alaska primary in which Joe Miller, one of its adherents, toppled Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski in her re-election bid. Miller joins a group of candidates, including Sharron Angle in Nevada and Rand Paul in Kentucky, who are carrying the Tea Party banner into the general election.

For months, Tea Party activists have run opposed to President Barack Obama and the Democratic-led Congress, waving the Constitution and talking about “taking back” the government. Never mind that the government is run by the people the voters elected to represent them — as outlined in the Constitution — the Tea Party is fueled by angry rhetoric, declarations of patriotism and references to the Founding Fathers.

For example, Dick Armey, a former Republican leader in Congress who heads a Tea Party group, this year offered the idea that the movement was founded in the beliefs of the Founding Fathers. He complained that there are Democrats and “people here who do not cherish America the way we do,” and he claimed they had not read the Constitution and “did not read the Federalist Papers,” the Founding Fathers’ arguments for the Constitution.

“Who the heck do these people think they are to try to sit in this town with their audacity and second-guess the greatest genius, most courageous genius, in the history of the world?” Armey said. “Who the hell do they think they are?”

As Dana Milbank noted in The Washington Post, Armey was asked how the Federalist Papers could be an inspiration for the Tea Party, which argues for states’ rights, given that their principal author, Alexander Hamilton, supported a strong federal government.

Armey attacked the question, saying, “I just doubt that was the case in fact about Hamilton.”

But it was the case in fact, and Army’s comments show a problem with the Tea Party movement. The Founding Fathers demonstrated genius, and in the creation of this country they brought a diversity of rich ideas and opinions. That kind of thought, though, is missing in this modern movement that loves to invoke the Founding Fathers. Instead, the country has been fed empty rhetoric meant to play on voters’ anger.

It may sound good to hear the Tea Party talk about limited government, but what does that mean? If it were up to Angle, there would be no Education Department, Energy Department or Environmental Protection Agency.

In Angle’s view, government aid would be peeled back and Social Security would be phased out. She has argued against an extension of unemployment benefits to out-of-work Americans because such payments have “spoiled” citizens.

She has also said it’s not a senator’s job to help create jobs and said she wouldn’t have done what Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid did when he worked to help MGM Resorts International finish CityCenter, saving more than 20,000 jobs.

People may be angry enough to throw the incumbents out of office this fall, but as the general election draws near, they should realize that voting against someone means casting a ballot for someone else. It is important to consider not just what the Tea Party candidates say they are against but also what they’re for because their beliefs and ideology will have a significant effect on this country should they be elected.

Discussion: 4 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Tea Party Core Values:

    --- Fiscal Responsibility.

    --- Constitutionally limited government.

    --- Free Markets.

  2. Less government? less regulation? mining deaths, oil rig explosions, run away cars, e coli spinach, salmonella eggs, endoscopy center and hospital infections...

    Hooray for the private sector?

    What should we do Sharon? Just pray that it doesn't happen to our families?

    No wonder the puppett masters behind the tea party (send teabags to your elected officials) are inherted wealth people that want to protect their pile of money at the expense of the rest of the country. (Just search engine the environmental and safty records of the Koch Bros. for example.)

    The unemployment and Social Security benefits you save maybe your own.

    Freedumb Works, AFP, NPI, Cato, Heritage, Rovian carpet bagger meddlers groups are the shock troops of the inherted wealth crowd.

  3. I read this recently on another site:

    Did you know that the words "race car" spelled backwards still spells "race car?"

    That "eat" is the only word, if you take the first letter and move it to the last, spells its past tense, "ate?"

    And if you rearrange the letters in "so-called tea party Republicans," and add just a few more letters, it spells:

    "Shut up you free-loading, progress-blocking, benefit-grabbing, resource-sucking, violent, narrow minded hypocrites, and face the fact that you nearly wrecked the country under Bush."

    Such is the Tea Party. Facts are twisted to make nonsense, lies, a wrong portrait of a variety of subjects and just plain outright bonkers crazy talk. And it is all painted as a "grass roots movement." No. It was created by the Republican Party as a fund raising effort, but it changed into a Frankenstein monster that has turned back on its master. Like a cancer from within, the Tea Party is chewing apart the Republican Party. THEY created it, so now they have to chase their own demons and figure out what to do with it...because all indications show they can't control it. Because people in the Tea Party are pretty much uncontrollable.

    I prefer the Sanity Party of the Democrats. And not the Republican created Tea Party.

    The Democrats give hope. Tea Partiers are just a bunch of rabble jumping up and down and screaming, talking in vague generalities, complaining about this that and the other, but partaking of the things they complain about, but offering no solutions to anything. Their emphasis is more on throwing hate this, hate that out there left and right, worried about President Obama using a teleprompter, and if he is an Islamo Nazi, and other incredibly dumb and stupid things that don't solve anything other than to make Republicans jump up and down in glee that they are there doing this stuff and throwing monkey wrenches in the gears of an administration that is doing its best to dig us out of a deep and wide economic pit...a pit the Republicans threw us in...and the same pit the Republicans want to go back into with the clear evidence of wanting to revert back to those failed policies if they get back into power.

    In November, slam the door on their faces here in Nevada. They offer nothing but hopelessness, misery, suffering, frustration and more and more economic ruin. To change now makes no sense. This recession is bad and it's going to take awhile to get out of it. To lose patience and switch in mid-stream will be destructive.

  4. This column is really not what the title says. It is just another anti-Angle rant.

    What exactly does the U.S. Department of Education do? Didn't Reagan want to get rid of too?

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.