Las Vegas Sun

March 1, 2015

Currently: 61° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Harry Reid, Sharron Angle polar opposites with views of economy

Click to enlarge photo

Republican Senate candidate Sharron Angle and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid debated economic and other issues only once, on Oct. 14. Vegas PBS' Mitch Fox, center, moderated.

With early voting under way in the race that will serve as the nation’s No. 1 referendum on Washington’s response to the recession, the Clintonian adage “It’s the economy, stupid” seems like a gross understatement. Nevadans have been thrust front and center as they decide whether to keep Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid or replace him with Sharron Angle.

Although the candidates may agree on what the problem is, they couldn’t disagree more on how to bring about solutions.

Republican — and Tea Party favorite — Angle and Democrat Reid are about as far apart as you can get on the spectrum of economic philosophies. She’s a free-market purist; he believes the government has to play a direct role in creating jobs, providing services and regulating the type of industry behavior that led to the cataclysmic crash.

That basic difference in approach is at the root of nearly every acerbic fight that has permeated this campaign, often to the point of overshadowing what tangibles each candidate offers to improve Nevadans’ lot.

Perhaps the bitterest barbs have been traded over health care. Angle has stated unequivocally that she wants to “repeal Obamacare,” referring to the health care overhaul that Congress passed, under Reid’s stewardship, this year.

The bill, which Reid says is necessary to protect Nevadans from a runaway industry that dominates about 20 percent of the national economy, would impose a series of mandates on insurance companies, including requirements to cover people regardless of pre-existing conditions. That all comes with a cost, although Reid points out that the cost of Medicare will fall in Nevada.

In their only debate, Angle said she doesn’t think insurance companies should be held to any coverage mandates, and that the free market will weed out the more expensive agencies that operate in bad faith. Reid scoffed at the idea of letting insurance companies go unregulated: “Insurance companies don’t do things out of the goodness of their hearts. They do it out of a profit motive, and they have almost destroyed our economy.”

Angle also promotes a limited government role when it comes to replenishing jobs lost during the recession.

“It’s not your job to create jobs,” she said to Reid during the debate. “It’s your job to create policies that create the confidence for the private sector to create those jobs.”

Reid says he’s tried to do just that through a small-business investment bill that Congress adopted last month, through funding research and development in renewable energy and by creating incentives for those firms to do business in Nevada.

Reid has identified the green jobs wave popularized under the Obama administration as Nevada’s best ticket out of the recession. His plan focuses chiefly on renewables that, in Nevada, mainly means solar power. Reid has said he wants to turn the Silver State into the Silicon Valley for green jobs.

A new renewable energy standard that Congress is expected to at least try to adopt during the lame-duck session — 15 percent renewables by 2021 — would give that industry another push.

Angle’s energy and job-creation plans steer clear of Reid’s renewables, instead promoting domestic oil exploration, coal mining and harvesting natural gas. But she promotes energy-related job creation through a controversial means here in Nevada: Yucca Mountain.

Although Angle maintains she’s against using the area as a dumping ground for the nation’s nuclear waste, she promotes turning Yucca Mountain into a reprocessing facility. That would bring jobs to the state, Angle says, in a cutting-edge industry that would also help the nation keep its energy costs in check.

Although that may address one concern about the Yucca proposal — dumping spent fuel straight into the ground — it doesn’t address what are in some ways the more widespread concerns about safe transportation. The fuel, not yet reprocessed, would still have to be brought to Nevada and once it gets here, Reid says, there “isn’t enough water in the whole state” to guarantee that reprocessing could be effective.

On other local issues of import, the candidates’ stances are less clear. For instance, it’s difficult to pin Angle down on gaming and tourism — long the backbone of the state’s economy — except that she blames Reid’s policies for exacerbating the state’s woes. The centrality of gaming and tourism is also what’s helped precipitate Nevada’s continued free fall through recession, while other states have begun to show signs of recovery.

Click to enlarge photo

President Barack Obama signs the tourism bill.

Although our senior senator has made disdainful quips about smelly tourists in the Capitol, he’s eager to bring them to Nevada, backing, along with Sen. John Ensign, a tourism-promotion bill that recently took effect. The measure establishes a national marketing agency for U.S. tourism, paid for by a one-time $14 entry fee for visitors — although that last bit is causing some grumbling from Europeans used to preferred status travel under the U.S.’s various visa-waiver arrangements.

But both Reid and Angle have shied away from endorsing Internet gambling, the fastest-growing gambling market, and a subject of which Nevada’s casinos are of mixed minds. Angle has almost completely avoided the issue; Reid has taken steps to support online poker, although he has also made recent statements that he won’t extend that support to other casino games. The push to legalize Internet gambling seemed set to make bold steps forward next Congress under the stewardship of Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass., but it’s not clear where that momentum will turn if the House flips to a Republican majority.

It’s similarly tough to do a direct comparison between Angle and Reid on high-speed rail. Beyond criticizing Reid for wasting federal dollars on the all-but-run-aground maglev project, Angle hasn’t voiced an opinion about high-speed rail. Reid, meanwhile, now backs the steel-wheel-on-rail DesertXpress.

Click to enlarge photo

A rendering shows a DesertXpress train, which is expected to reach a top speed of about 150 miles per hour and travel between Victorville, Calif., and Las Vegas.

When it comes to mining, both want to see the 1872 Mining Law remain intact, although the traditionally conservative industry has come out in vociferous support of Reid, saying he’s the only one who can guarantee that the state arrangement for miners will be preserved.

The heads of these local industry associations — gaming, tourism, mining — have come out in support of Reid.

But except for those directly involved, Nevada’s boutique issues aren’t moving people to the polls. Rather, it is Nevadans’ lot as the nation’s worst-off in areas with national sweep — unemployment and foreclosures.

In its heyday, Nevada floated on the housing bubble; now burst, lawmakers haven’t been able to do much to stem the tide of foreclosures. Reid did push a loan modification program for underwater homeowners through Congress, and under pressure from his office, Bank of America agreed this month to issue a moratorium on foreclosure proceedings. But that was perhaps more because of a national scandal about faulty procedures than congressional pressure in the wake of the housing crisis. (The moratorium has since been lifted for 23 states, but still exists in Nevada.)

Reid has promised that new government regulations on big lenders recently adopted by Congress “will stop these greedy bankers on Wall Street from taking advantage of homeowners,” but he acknowledges, “We have to do more, of course.”

It’s a similar story on unemployment. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated the stimulus saved 3.3 million jobs of the more than 8 million lost in the recession, but that’s still a net drop of almost 5 million jobs. Nevada is also one of those states where unemployment has risen steadily, especially for the long-term unemployed — those who have been out of work so long that they have exhausted their 99 weeks of unemployment checks and are no longer being counted as part of the workforce.

That picture of only partial remedies has made it difficult for Reid to get any rise in the polls because of his work on the stimulus, even if, as independent economists say, it was successful in making a massive economic disaster less destructive.

Angle has been able to capitalize on these statewide frustrations without having to get into specifics on counterproposals. But her calls for “lifting the fog of taxation and regulation” on businesses as a remedy for the economy do fit with her overall message of getting the government out, and things will right themselves.

To bring about that end, she says she has a prescription: privatize, localize and downsize. The first part of that recipe is to keep taxes low. Angle supports an across-the-board extension of the Bush tax cut plan that, without congressional action, will kick up tax rates by 3 percent at all income levels at year’s end (affecting 2011 taxes).

That proposal would add $4 trillion to the national deficit over 10 years. President Barack Obama and Reid back a more limited extension of the same tax cuts, affecting the first $250,000 of every family’s income only, a ceiling that 97 percent of the country falls below. That proposal would add $3 trillion to the deficit over the same time period.

Beyond that, Angle says, we need to start cutting. Cut spending, scale back unemployment insurance, privatize Social Security and get rid of federal institutions such as the Education Department, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Endowment for the Arts.

Reid doesn’t support those cuts.

But that’s perhaps the best illustration of how in the end, as tangible as Nevada’s problems are, the decision for voters on whom to trust to fix them really will come down to a decision between philosophical opposites. Insider versus outsider. Big versus small. Chisel versus hacksaw. The guiding hand of government versus free market. It’s not exactly Keynes versus Smith, but it’s close.

This story first appeared in the current issue of In Business Las Vegas, a sister publication of the Sun.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 9 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. "But that's perhaps the best illustration of how in the end, as tangible as Nevada's problems are, the decision for voters on whom to trust to fix them really will come down to a decision between philosophical opposites. Insider versus outsider. Big versus small. Chisel versus hacksaw."

    You missed a couple, Karoun Demirjian.

    Crazy versus sane.

    Nuttiness versus rational thought.

    My vote stays with Senator Reid.

    If Sharron Angle gets in, we might as well all become homeless panhandlers with tin cups sitting on the pedestrian bridge over Las Vegas Boulevard that connects MGM Grand with New York New York casinos pleading for spare change. That will help her pursue the complete and utter destruction of Nevada.

  2. Simple FACT:
    We NEED Harry Reid.

    It's very, very basic, the difference in philosophies between Dem's & Repub's...

    "I, ME, MINE" Republican mantra...

    "We, Us, Ours" Democratic mantra...

    WE are ALL in this together.
    Don't let Karl Rove & the Koch Bros. BUY OUR ELECTION!

  3. When I drive in the area, I see public construction projects under way on the highways. Sometimes it seems that the only construction active in the valley is public because there are only a few active private ones and so many public ones. The State and County are not the source of funding for these. It is the Feds. More specifically, it is the "failed" stimulus money.

    Now I have lots of problems with public spending, but, putting that aside for the moment, on the one hand we have observable facts -- actual, ongoing, active federally-funded construction on public projects which I can see with my own eyes, and on the other hand we have constant bombardment of political ads. What am I going to believe? My own eyes or the commercials made elsewhere? Apparently, I'm in the minority because half of Nevadans would rather believe nattering nonsense than their own eyes.

    When I go to other states, I see a project here or there, but nothing like the density or extent of public projects here in Nevada. Maybe its an optical illusion but Nevada seems (to my observation) to have a lot of projects for a state with a small population. What am I going to believe? My own eyes or commercials? I don't like Harry Reid, but claims that he has "failed Nevada" are flatly contradicted by observable fact -- all anyone has to do is drive around to see that. Apparently, however, half of all voters in Nevada are shut-ins, connected to the world only by and through electronic devices -- and for them, "reality" is whatever they get through those devices.

    If Nevada's unemployment rate is 15% (as measured -- don't get me started on the statistical stupidities of how we measure unemployment) with these federally-funded construction projects, what would it be like without any of that federal spending? Apparently, half of all Nevadans will bet it all to see the next card -- and being law abiding gamblers, they haven't counted cards to see what its value might be. The nattering nabobs keep telling them its the 5th Ace -- and they'd rather believe that than the four they can already see on the table.

  4. Again, Angle dates back to 17th Century thinking financed by Rove who should be in prison and touted by the nuts in the Tea Party, constant lies by Palin, and Fox.

    If voters ignore the facts and vote for anyone other than a Democrat in Nevada or anywhere in America its a vote against their own self interests, against American progress, and will slam the door on the survival of this countries middle class, prospect of any good jobs ever returning to America, and greasing the skids towards our becomming a third world country at the hands of the Republican party who are EVIL.

    To expect this President to clean up 30 years of Republican destruction in 2 years is Tea Party talk and it too is insane. Be upset if necessary but don't give the power back to the mindless thugs in the Republican party who drove this great country into the ditch.

    Common sense,...if anyone still has any,...dictates a vote for Harry Reid in Nevada, Democratic across the country. No sitting home on your hands watching TV,...not voting is a vote for Republicans,...and they have done enough damage already.

  5. Tea Partiers think they will have less gov't regulation, but it is corporate America that will rule America, crushing individual rights. Excessive charges for gas, material goods are the hidden tax. Angle's website shows her support of coal and oil, but no mention of renewable energy, as opposed to Reid's extensive efforts to develop renewables in NV. Hence the funding her campaign receives from Big Oil.

    While Sharron Angle has minimized damage from the recent Oil Spill, saying this is an isolated event, and isn't likely to happen in the future, this article and map shows millions of gallons of oil spilled from 542 reported pipeline damages during Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

    Save our soldiers by bringing them home from Bush's war for Middle Eastern oil by reducing dependency on foreign oil with renewables, rescue our economy (which crashed as gas prices skyrocketed) by reducing oil company profiteering.

  6. Larry, you ever noticed how so many of the Angle supporters are "not trusted"?

  7. Salty, you must be new in town. Quite a few of the liberal fringe aren't trusted...... literally and figuratively.

  8. the Erie canal, the transcontinental railroad, the Panama Canal, the polio vaccine, the panama canal, the inter state highway system, the Hoover Dam, the bypass bridge, the space program, satellites.....if the Angle ruled the world people would still be in caves. She would have been against the Roman Highways and aqueducts.

    She is a pea brain who has 10 talking points that she belches out on cue.