Las Vegas Sun

August 21, 2014

Currently: 78° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Nevada’s seasonal jobs outlook not exactly jolly

State’s hiring bump won’t compare with gains expected nationally

Economists have been pleasantly surprised by early estimates of hiring for the holiday retail season. Nationwide, retailers hired 150,000 workers in October in preparation for the all-important holiday buying season, matching the pre-recession year of 2006.

But as with so much else during this Great Recession, the picture is less bright in Southern Nevada.

“It’s difficult to compare to 2008 and 2009,” said Nevada economist Bill Anderson, referring to the lackluster holiday hiring of the crisis years. “But I expect something similar this year.”

That’s the bad news. Let’s start with the good news coming from the rest of the country, which hopefully will spread to Nevada, even if not this year.

The National Retail Federation predicts holiday spending will be up 2.3 percent this year over last. Granted, last year was atrocious, but the increase indicates the all-important American consumer may be taking a respite from paying down debt to do some buying this season.

Consumers across the country are still being cautious but are starting to buy, said Jerry Nickelsburg, senior economist with UCLA’s Anderson Forecast.

To meet the demand, retailers are hiring.

The consulting firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas is forecasting that retailers could add 600,000 to 650,000 workers this holiday season, up 30 percent compared with last year. (The National Retail Federation doesn’t forecast seasonal hiring.)

CEO John Challenger said retailers aren’t just trying to meet demand. They’ve also done extra hiring and training to improve customer service in the hope that the effort will lead to a competitive advantage and higher sales.

In other words, they’re investing in their work forces.

This is a significant departure from the past few years, when many companies slashed payrolls and hoarded cash to ride out the recession. Now, apparently, at least some companies think there’s money to be made investing in new workers.

But the recession has been so crushing in Nevada that battered consumers are almost certainly unready to begin really spending again. While there will be some seasonal retail hiring, it will pale compared with other regions.

“The downturn still lingers on where you are,” said Nickelsburg, of the Anderson Forecast. “Retailers who look at the situation realistically see that consumers aren’t seeing enough of a rise in income to translate into a good economy.”

A recent report by the Retail Association of Nevada, prepared by local consulting firm Applied Analysis, shows in brutal detail what the recession has done to Nevada consumers.

From September 2008 to September 2010, average weekly wages decreased 10.7 percent, while average weekly hours were down 7.5 percent.

Wages per capita, which is all the income earned divided by the total number of Nevadans, were down 18 percent as of the first quarter of this year compared with early 2008.

That huge reduction has of course been driven, to a large degree, by the 14.1 percent unemployment rate, which is probably above 20 percent when part-time workers who would rather be full time and those who have given up looking for jobs are added to the total. There’s also the anti-wealth effect. The “wealth effect” refers to consumers’ propensity to spend more if the value of their investments and homes are rising. But 80 percent of Las Vegas mortgages are underwater, meaning the home is worth less than what is owed. So instead of a “wealth effect,” local consumers are enduring its opposite.

Add it up, and Nevadans just don’t have the money to be splurging on gifts.

Alyson Bettelman, who prepared the study for Applied Analysis, said that although the outlook looks a little better this year, there’s just no escaping job losses and wage cuts.

Nevada taxable sales have been rising, up 4.1 percent for the 1st quarter of fiscal 2011 compared with a year ago. How could this be?

Nevada took a hit in the recession because fewer tourists came and those who did spent less money. Now, the reverse is happening: The economy is recovering elsewhere, and some tourists are returning.

Perhaps those tourists will spend money in stores that are now too rich for many Nevadans.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 6 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. This is what I like about the LV Sun.

    A presentation of the facts & figures accompanied by a completely reasonable interpretation...not exaggerations of optimism...or negativity.

    THIS is straight talk with real names of real people...not faceless, anonymous "analysts believe" or "economists predict"...and then come the bogus, unsubstantiated projections.

    Excellent job, J. Patrick Coolican.

    THIS is journalism.

  2. 40% of people tourists come from 10% from Arizona. Many of those people don't want the long drive on the congested roads. Like they don't have stores in LA?

    Also some people don't like Metro because of the Scott and Cole killings. Plus the medical pot raids don't do any good either.

    Stay in SOCAL, save gas, save a 8 hour drive, gamble at a Native American Casino, use medical pot, deal with relatively laid back suburban cops....or hassle with a trip to Vegas and Metro thugs.

  3. MRed - Maybe Las Vegas doesn't need to worry about more growth as long as there aren't any great declines. Cities suffer when traffic is so congested. I lived in Las Vegas late 70's and 80's and thought traffic was bad then...

    At any rate Las Vegas won't be growing at any time soon but you do need some tourists.

  4. Good point, Ocean. the area was too reliant on construction. People don't like being back up in I15 traffic.

    I was in France and people are still talking about that Franch Guy that was killed out here.

  5. I haven't seen that many French tourists since this happened. We have got to rain in Metro before they bankrupt the area, the pot busts are the next shoe dropping. The plane towing the banner in regard to the Scott death doesn't help tourism either.

    http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=94358&...

    http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2...

  6. Are you talking about Stefan Alois Lee, the lead singer of Gotthard, who got hit by the truck while with a group of motorcyclists that stopped by the side of the I-15 up by Mesquite to don raingear? He was Swiss (alhtough he has a French sounding name and spoke French and German fluently). Or is there some other French guy that got killed over here that I hadn't heard about? Hard to keep track of all these incidents.