Monday, May 17, 2010 | 2 a.m.
Sun Coverage
Sun Archives
- Plaintiff: $500 million ‘exactly what was needed’ to make statement in hepatitis C case (5-7-2010)
- Attorney seeking $1 billion in hepatitis C case (5-6-2010)
- Jury finds drugmakers liable in first hepatitis C trial (5-5-2010)
- Jurors to resume hepatitis C deliberations Wednesday (5-4-2010)
- Deliberations continue in first hepatitis C case to reach trial (5-3-2010)
- Jury deliberates in first hepatitis C case to reach trial (4-30-2010)
- Expert: Hepatitis C victim suffered multi-million dollar damages (4-27-2010)
- Man recounts hepatitis C’s effect on health, family (4-26-2010)
- Opening arguments begin in first hepatitis C case to reach trial (4-19-2010)
- Jurors chosen in first hepatitis C case to reach trial (4-15-2010)
- Jury selection begins in first hepatitis C case to reach trial (4-12-2010)
- Insurance company wants cap on payments in hepatitis C cases (2-10-2010)
- Proposed settlements at issue in endoscopy case (1-5-2010)
- Thoroughness, not haste, key in probe of clinic’s insurance billing practices (1-2-2010)
Consumers, businesses and physicians can expect a financial hit if a state-record jury verdict of $500 million in punitive damages holds up in the Las Vegas case involving hepatitis C victim Henry Chanin, insurance and health care professionals say.
They say such a large award could result in higher insurance and drug prices as the companies that have been ordered to pay the judgment — Teva Parenteral Medicines and Baxter Healthcare — as well as their insurers, would pass that cost to their customers.
But an attorney who represents other former patients of shuttered valley clinics tied to the hepatitis C outbreak said the companies make such large profits they should be able to absorb sizable damages without passing those costs to consumers.
A Clark County jury reached the punitive verdict May 7, on top of an earlier decision to award Chanin and his wife $5.1 million in compensatory damages, in the first courtroom decision involving the hepatitis outbreak that was announced in February 2008. The jury found Teva and Baxter liable for 50-milliliter vials of the sedative propofol that plaintiffs’ attorneys say encouraged reuse by health care professionals on multiple patients, making them vulnerable to the potentially fatal hepatitis virus.
One such victim was Chanin, who contracted the virus at the now-closed Desert Shadow Endoscopy Center.
Teva and Baxter plan to appeal the verdict but if they lose, the economic ramifications could be widespread. Hundreds of other lawsuits are yet to be decided in related cases tied to Dr. Dipak Desai and his former endoscopy clinics, where the staff reused syringes, which contaminated the vials of propofol and spread the virus. Plaintiffs’ lawyers also have indicated they could go after other “deep pockets,” including health maintenance organizations.
Physicians are likely to see higher drug costs if such a large punitive verdict is allowed to stand, said Dr. Annette Teijeiro, an anesthesiologist who is president of the Clark County Medical Society.
“When a company has suffered a loss, they have to make up that deficit somewhere else,” she said. “Since these companies serve medical clinics and doctors’ offices, that’s whose costs will go up.”
But Teijeiro said doctors likely won’t succeed in passing those costs on to patients because they’re typically locked into multiyear contracts with HMOs and other insurers that supply patients in exchange for physicians agreeing to provide medical care at certain prices.
“To pass on the costs, doctors would have to renegotiate their contracts,” Teijeiro said. “Why would an insurance company agree to renegotiate a contract for a higher amount?”
In the case of insurance, Larry Harrison, spokesman for the Clark County Association of Health Underwriters, said consumers could pay higher premiums within 12 to 18 months after a company is ordered to satisfy a large punitive damages award. After the insurer — or in the case of many companies, the reinsurer that serves as a backstop for the insurer — pays off the claim, Harrison said the insurer generally will spread hikes in premiums three ways.
Roughly one-third would be absorbed by the company that lost the lawsuit, one-third would be spread among similar companies in the same industry, and the remaining third would be passed on to all of the insurer’s customers, Harrison said.
“Everyone becomes a first cousin,” Harrison said. “When there is a fire or a flood or an earthquake, we all become first cousins because it is our reinsurer who will pay most of the claims. And the money just doesn’t fall from the sky. Reinsurers are in business to make a profit.”
Association President Dan Heffley said consumers can also expect the cost of certain drugs to increase, especially if manufacturers want to avoid getting sued as Teva and Baxter did.
“They would have no choice but to increase the cost of their drugs,” Heffley said. “I don’t believe it will be limited to propofol either. What this will force pharmaceutical companies to do is to individually package each dose or make single-dose vials. It costs more to produce smaller packages.”
The national Safe Injection Practices Coalition that includes the Nevada State Medical Association, the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and patient advocacy groups is pushing for more single-dose and single-vial packaging, as well as multi-dose vials that are clearly marked for single patients. The coalition — formed in 2008 in response to the valley’s hepatitis outbreak and roughly 100 smaller ones throughout the country over the past 10 years — is also advocating that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration adopt standards that address packaging issues and make warning labels clearer for health care professionals.
Even if the Chanin verdict is reversed or substantially lowered by an appellate court, state association Executive Director Larry Matheis said he expects drug companies’ costs to increase if and when those standards are adopted.
“It will lead to increased costs because those people will be spending money on things they didn’t spend as much money on before,” Matheis said. “But the end result is that we should have a safer system.”
If the verdict stands, though, Matheis said drug companies could be forced into more out-of-court settlements that would drive up their insurance costs and create greater impetus to practice defensive medicine, “which would also push up costs.”
Victor Schwartz, general counsel for the American Tort Reform Association, said that he doubts the Chanin jury verdict would have much effect on the cost of seeing a doctor. But Schwartz, whose organization believes that punitive damage awards have gotten out of hand, said the verdict could drive up the costs of medical supplies sold in Nevada.
(Schwartz said he has no involvement in the Las Vegas hepatitis litigation. But Portfolio Media, a news service for business lawyers, has reported that Shook, Hardy & Bacon, where he serves as a law partner, has represented Baxter International, parent of Baxter Healthcare.)
Schwartz said a medical supplier might think twice about selling a product to “rogue” clinics or doctors who may misuse the product and wind up getting sued. If that happens, health care providers might have to go out of state to obtain certain medical supplies, he said.
“I would be cautious about what health care product I sold in the state,” he said.
But Las Vegas attorney Gerald Gillock, who reached out-of-court medical malpractice settlements on behalf of 18 clients tied to the hepatitis case, said Teva and Baxter easily can afford the respective $356 million and $144 million punitive damage awards the jury ordered them to pay. That is based on the fact that Teva’s parent, an Israeli company with a market value of more than $50 billion, reported net income of $2 billion last year, while Baxter International is valued at more than $26 billion and netted $2.2 billion in 2009.
“It won’t have any impact on consumer costs because their profits are in the billions,” Gillock said. “If they have eight or nine more cases arguing the same thing as they did here, their profits will suffer. The fix is so simple. All they have to do is make single-dose vials.”






Looks like we need government imposed price controls.
The prescription drug bill, which forbade the US government from negotiating drug prices, should be rescinded.
California has had a $250k cap on pain and suffering for over 15 years, and their healthcare costs have shot up exponentially.
We can also cut off foreign aid to Israel if Teva raises prices.
Yep, go to keep those Health Care CEO in their multi-million dollar a year salaries!
Love how two different attorneys are sited saying, "no, prices won't go up - they can afford it!!..blahblahblah" ALL TRIAL LAWYERS SUCK!
The drug companies did the wrong along with the doctors. WHY should the "people" have to pay? Make the companies, doctors an their insurance companies pay without passing the costs on. And for insurance companies? Dont ever feel sorry for them - its the one business in this country that never looses money - because they just pass the losses on to the customer with higher premiums. You dont think the oil spill in
New Orleans will effect the insurance companies? It wont - BP and everyone else in the world, will just pay higher premiums. Anyone want to start an insurance company with me?
hey district attorney david roger...
what the hell is going on with the hepatitis cases???
hmmm???
anything???
been over 2 years buddy...
you want to know what i am starting to think...
i am starting to think you are a lousy district attorney...
i mean a real joke...
incapable of protecting the public...
and i think you need to be replaced...
by anyone!!!
hey attorney general catherine cortez masto...
what the hell is going on with the hepatitis cases???
hmmm???
anything???
been over 2 years dear...
you want to know what i am starting to think...
i am starting to think you are a lousy attorney general...
i mean a real joke...
incapable of protecting the public...
and i think you need to be replaced...
by anyone!!!
listen up boys and girls...
sadly...
most sadly...
large civil damages appears to be the only means of protection the citizens of nevada have...
near as i can tell...
district attorney david rogers is a joke and needs to be replaced...
attorney general catherine cortez masto is a joke and needs to be replaced...
the medical board is a joke and needs to be blown up by the legislators and a new entity answerable to the citizens of nevada needs to be established in it's place...
so...
you see...
when you have such pathetic public officials...
the only means of protection you have is large civil damages...
sad...
but true...
Problem isn't with the drug company its with the jury that awarded the insane verdict. The docs and nurses are responsible for the infection. They administered the drug not the drug company. And single dose viles aren't the answer. You mean to tell mean these incompetent nurses/docs didn't know what they were doing. Come on! Oh and NHC is the answer. Why because they put a max price on the incompetent nurses/docs. These are the ones responsible and should be sued and put in jail. They have insurance..go after there insurance companies.
Of course the real culprits are the doc and nurses that reused a $5 needle and syringe.
They should have been in criminal trials.
But the medical profession doesn't do a good job of self regulation.
But wait, I thought conservatives believed in "personal responsibility"? Wouldn't that include corporate responsibility as well? Shouldn't Teva & Baxter be held responsible for what they did to Henry Chanin, along with many other innocent victims here in Clark County? Or does today's GOoP really believe in "personal responsibility" only for us plebes while the big corporate fat cats keep getting their "socialized bailouts"?
$500 million? That's a nice chunk of change if they ultimately get it. I wouldn't be surprised if the ultimate claim paid is only a few hundred thousand.
atdleft: Please identify which bailout was given to Teva/Baxter? Or are you just bloviating? Also remember that corporations are made up of stockholders who demand a return (SHOCK) on their investment. You might know them better as "profits" (SHOCK--evil term alert) that you get when you put money in your 401k in hopes of retiring someday.
Our current crop of leaders think it's ok to steal stockholders' investments (GM Bondholders) nationalize corporations and bail out union their pension and healthcare plans that overpromised and underperformed. A lot of people who counted on that money to be their in their retirement plans were shafted by your liberal buddies for payback for union support.
Don't forget their is a "person" in the term personal responsibility and that applies to everyone.
"there in their" apologies to the grammar police.
bbtbrain: apology accepted.
mred: Will you agree to a law capping attorneys' fees on large judgments at say 10% and a windfall income tax on those judgments?
Fair is fair isn't it after all? Why should one group profit from another's misfortune? We need to even everything out don't we? How many Bentleys does Bob Eglet deserve?
Joe Biden: "This is a Big F * ken deal!"
Sarah Palin: "Can I call ya Joe"?
Janet Napalitano: "The System worked"
Eric Holder: " I haven't read the bill"
Geroge W. " I'm the decider"
Dick Cheney: " Just a few dead-enders"
Bill Clinton: "That woman"
We are surrounded by IDIOTS!
We have a RUN-AMOK political,legal and heath care system - so the Dems decide to increase the scope of the broken system by 700% before fixing it.
hey bbtbrain...
let's not forget one thing partner...
what teva did was wrong...
it was absolutely foreseeable that some doctor would misuse their product...
absolutely foreseeable...
they were wrong...
they must pay...
now...
what's strikes me as funny about your comments...
first...
if you think obama wants to own gm...
you are an idiot...
to ascribe that sort of evil motive is ridiculous...
he did what he did to save jobs...
it just amazes me how you clowns think you are so clever when you say those things...
it's hog wash...
second...
why do you clowns always go after the lawyers...
it is nothing more than a pr stunt...
let me tell you something pal...
given the absolutely pathetic response of district attorney david roger, attorney general catherine cortez masto, and the nevada medical board...
nothing of consequence has been done but this...
but for the lawyers the people of nevada would have received essentially no protection...
third...
tell me...
don't you guys ever get tired of defending the bad guys...
teva is the bad guy here...
the health insurance companies and their very real death panels are the bad guys...
wall street is the bad guys...
yet you clowns always defend them...
i'll tell you one thing...
they must laugh their butts off at you clowns every night when they go to bed...
they must just laugh out loud...
This is all BS.......They're having to pay for mistakes they made and they are holding the public hostage and threatening them with higher rates because of this judgement? Give me a break !!
God forbid this cuts into their ENORMOUS profits and premiums
Of course our costs will increase. Companies always pass the costs back to the end user. This isn't a punishment to the company or the doctors, it punishes all the rest of us. If a crime it committed people should go to jail. The victim should get reasonable reimbursment but huge awards like this are ridiculous primarily because it make victims of the rest of us.
It shows you how naive these attornies are, health care cost won't go up. Of course they will go up, why do you think health care cost so much. $30 for one asprin. The medical society has to charge so much to not only pay for overheard but insurance is killing them because of the law suits, medical services is not easy, especially today, most patients have so many issues that treatment is so complex. This case will be overturned because of the precedence its set. If the drug company was responsible for how doctors and technicians used a product that is clearly label, then no company is safe from law suits. The drug company did everything possible to ensure the safety of their product, when you add the human factor, things will go wrong.
This is just a case of lawyers going after someone with deep pockets (drug companies) rather than placing fault where it lies (Dr's and staff of the clinic). Had the staff used proper procedures and not reused syringes there would have been no spread of hepatitis. That's all there is to it. The clinic decided what size propofol container to purchase. Larger size bottles are perfectly safe if sterile equipment is used with them. As an example, there are millions of flu shots given every year from multi-use vials. Only an idiot (criminally negligent idiot) would reuse needles from one patient to another. The person(s) who made that decision are the only guilty ones here. The drug companies were just convenient targets for the lawyers. And yes, if not overturned on appeal, this judgment WILL affect insurance costs in the future.
Propofol is no longer under patent. Since anyone can produce it, it is questionable that Teva could raise the price significantly as their competitors will not have to and can then undercut them.
With that said, the Supreme Court of the USA has said that punative damages more than 10x actual damages are unconstitutional. So this puntavive damages award is coming down to $50 million max, in the federal courts if not in the state courts.
Prison? Who has gone to prison? Put the doctor(s) in prison and the unsafe practices will be "evaluated" as to cost to risk.
Until the criminal legal system does it's job, we all pay.
The United States Supreme Court has stated that punitive damages must not be unreasonable; to avoid violation of the Due Process Clause of the Constitution, punitive damages must be limited to application of a single-digit multiplier to compensatory damages, i.e. no more than 9X actual damages. The Court later held that 4X actual damages was the correct amount to apply to the facts of a specific case. More recently, in the Exxon Valdez case, the Court limited punitive damages to 1X actual damages, even though actual damages were not fully measurable. One aspect of the fact that actual damages were not fully measurable can be demonstrated by the fact that the damages continue to negatively affect the quality of life of the plaintiffs and the environment fully 20 years after the Exxon Valdez disaster.
In light of the Exxon Valdez decision limiting punitive damages to a multiplier of one, a punitive damages verdict of 98 times compensatory damages will not be collected, notwithstanding that the Bill of Rights should apply only to natural persons, not fictitious persons under the law such as corporations.
Blaming these manufacturers for abuse of their product is like blaming brewers who put their product in kegs for alcoholism.
Ignorance is bliss and we are rapidly becoming the happiest people on the planet.
What's next?? Do we sue cereal companies for making family sized portions instead of single serving containers? Why do consumers purchase in bulk? Because it saves money. It is up to the consumer to portion the product. Making the doctors and nurses responsible seems perfectly logical. That's why medical care costs so much. Because they are allegedly trained.
Isn't the propofol administered by weight? How does one make a single serving container that's right for ALL?
If someone overdoses on asprin, is it Bayer's fault? Should they make single packet servings instead of bottles?
Policy changes recommended by The National Safe Injection Practices Coalition could be an answer to keeping the general public safer and if there were policies in place that the manufacturer ignored, then I am all in favour of punishing them for violating those policies, but not to the individual.
Forgive me for being "simple" but I think they DID deliberately target the big pockets and the whole comment and mentality that since the parent company made BILLIONS, they can afford to give millions in compensation, is pure greed. I would have been more inclined to accept that the parent company (and I still don't understand how it's THEIR fault a professional mis-used their product) was to pay this individual a large sum for personal use for the rest of their life.
Say what you will, but I would be willing to bet anything, when dad dies, the family will be divided by members fighting over money, while the attorney enjoys his modest 33 to 50% share of the 500 mil.
This whole situation is sad and the fact these people's lives are media fodder and that their futures have been destroyed by the doctors and nurses that should have protected them is just unforgivable. No one will win in this scenerio. The hospitals, doctors, malpractice insurers, pharmacudical companies and the like will institute huge stopgap measures to protect themselves and further cause people to file more lawsuits looking to make millions in personal profits. Hey, it pays more than Megabucks.
Anyone who thinks that the cost wont be passed along to the consumer one way or another is a blithering fool.
"Anyone who thinks that the cost wont be passed along to the consumer one way or another is a blithering fool."
If you only tag one company, and you tag it on a commodity product, there just is no way to pass along the cost.
Say 4 companies all make commodity product X and sell it for a dollar. Now one of the four companies has some sort of issue and the only way it can make money is by selling the commodity product for $2. Three competitors are still selling it for a buck. The company with the higher cost is screwed.
The only way that entire industries of commodity products get hurt is if the costs are spread out to all companies. The only time this happened judicially as far as I know was with the asbestos industry. That did raise costs across the board. But in this case, only one company got tagged and they are going to pay whatever the appeals courts agree on. Unless they have proprietary products to spread those costs to. Propofol cannot increase in price because it is a commodity (and a pretty simple molecule too.)
I doubt the couple will live to see the $ .
Well duh, maybe they'll just jack up one of their proprietary drugs, ya think?
Not only that, the entire pharm industry could now be subject to similar ridiculous judgements.
It will be overturned.
Health reform already helping Nevada families
http://bit.ly/dnnVYw
birdeidreamin: I don't generally address your comments as they're prepared, phrased and produced in a non-sensical manner. If you prefer to speak in complete sentences and provide some thought behind your rants I'll certainly consider a response.
On the subject matter: There is no evidence a vial of anesthetic ever jumped off a table and killed someone without an ethically challenged person driving. Justice stops at the courtroom door. Under your logic one could sue McDonalds for inducing one to buy a supersize meal and then suing because the fat content was too high. When you can advance a cogent argument you might get respect.
Mr. Barasky: Does that mean Harry has stopped taking campaign money from the trial lawyers? Will we now get some tort reform or is Harry just going to use this verdict to solicit some more campaign donations from his big trial attorney supporters? We want to know Justin.
JustinBarasky-ReidCampaign ,
You're not helping yourself or your candidate by posting an off topic reference to your campaign propaganda site.
Care to discuss the issue at hand? Or was this just a normal liberal drive by troll posting?
Yes, I'm a registered Nevada voter, and I'll be awaiting your thoughtful, topic related response...
mred says:We can also cut off foreign aid to Israel if Teva raises prices.
Now there's a touughtful comment.............
When jurors go wild, How Vegas of them!