Las Vegas Sun

April 24, 2024

Judge says banquet servers don’t qualify for overtime pay

Nevada hotel banquet servers aren’t entitled to time-and-a-half overtime pay under federal or state law, a judge in Las Vegas ruled.

Attorneys in the case on Wednesday offered dramatically different reactions to the lengthy ruling filed March 8 by Clark County District Court Judge Linda Bell.

Attorney Deanna Forbush represented Las Vegas Sands Corp.’s Venetian resort in the lawsuit filed against the Venetian by former banquet server Steven Csomos in January 2009. Csomos said he was paid for all hours worked, but he didn’t receive time-and-a-half pay for overtime.

Forbush said banquet workers would welcome the ruling because, even without overtime, many earn six-figure incomes.

She said the servers enjoy their flexible schedules that involve long hours some days, followed by plenty of time off between events.

Attorney Leon Greenberg filed the suit seeking class-action status against the Venetian and plans to appeal the ruling.

He said workers overall are the losers since hotels –- not having to pay overtime –- have an incentive to maintain a limited staff of servers. If the hotels had to pay overtime, they’d likely hire more servers to spread the work around to limit overtime pay, Greenberg said.

Greenberg also said the more the existing servers earn, the less the resorts have to pay overall for unemployment insurance and benefits. With additional servers, those expenses overall would increase.

Forbush, of the Las Vegas office of the law firm Fox Rothschild LLP, successfully argued two key points:

• Overtime disputes don’t belong in state court and instead must be filed with the state labor commissioner.

• Banquet servers are exempt from overtime pay, which has been the longtime industry practice.

“The court finds that (Nevada Revised Statute 608.018) provides no private cause of action for overtime compensation,” Bell wrote in her ruling.

Bell found that banquet servers are exempt from overtime under provisions in the law exempting retail sales people earning commission.

“Federal law defines retail establishments as hotels and restaurants,” Bell wrote. “The Venetian is a hotel and casino with a number of restaurants. Therefore, the Venetian would be included under the federal definition of a retail establishment. Further, federal case law has determined the service charge a banquet server earns is analogous to a commission.”

Bell added that the 2005 version of the law in question was open to a number of interpretations because the language was not clear.

The law was changed in 2009.

Looking at the legislative history, Bell noted testimony from two union officials about banquet industry practices. The Venetian is nonunion but apparently has banquet practices similar to union resorts.

Bell wrote that Pilar Weiss, political director of the Culinary Union at the time, testified the union favored changes to clarify any “misinterpretation that would lead to an unfortunate precedent of people not being brought on for banquet functions to avoid overtime.”

And Bell noted that Culinary Union member and state Sen. Maggie Carlton, also arguing for clarifications, said: “If the overtime provision were to apply (to banquet servers) they would work less...We are not talking about taking overtime away from employees, we would just allow the status quo to continue.”

The 2009 changes brought uniformity to federal and state labor law, both exempting banquet servers from overtime, Bell wrote.

Forbush on Wednesday said the ruling was significant in that if Csomos had prevailed in his lawsuit, the banquet industry would have had to change the way it operates.

“It was a very important case, really a case of first impression,” she said.

Greenberg, however, continued to argue that people with overtime claims should be allowed to file lawsuits instead of taking their cases to the labor commissioner.

The labor commissioner’s office, he said, was set up to help people who can’t afford attorneys and the office is understaffed, he said.

For those who can afford attorneys, he said, “the courthouse door should be open to them.”

Greenberg also said Bell misinterpreted the law in equating banquet servers with retail sales people earning commission.

“They don’t sell anything,” he said of the servers.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy