Las Vegas Sun

February 12, 2012

Currently: 62° | Complete forecast | Log in

Part of Cupcakery lawsuit over trade secrets dismissed

Thursday, March 18, 2010 | 9:37 a.m.

Related Document (.pdf)

A judge on Wednesday dismissed part of a lawsuit filed by Las Vegas cupcake company The Cupcakery claiming a former worker stole trade secrets and infringed on Cupcakery trademarks by opening gourmet cupcake shops in California.

The Cupcakery, launched by Pamela Jenkins in 2005 and now with multiple shops, filed suit in U.S. District Court in Las Vegas in May 2009 against former employee Andrea Ballus, who has opened cupcake shops in Napa, Cotati and Santa Rosa, Calif., called Sift: A Cupcakery.

The suit charged Ballus has been profiting from The Cupcakery's trademarks and other intellectual property assets.

Jenkins' company alleged Ballus applied for and was hired for a part-time position at The Cupcakery in January 2008 and that while working there, she registered the trade name Sift: A Cupcakery with the California Secretary of State.

"Ballus used plaintiff’s trade secrets and confidential information obtained during the course and scope of her employment at The Cupcakery to develop a competing cupcake business," the suit charged. "Ballus procured her employment with The Cupcakery under false pretenses and in order to obtain such confidential information and other trade secrets regarding plaintiff’s business model to aid in the development of her own gourmet cupcake business."

Ballus was represented in the case by attorneys James Olson, Michael Stoberski and Jeffrey Allen of the Las Vegas law firm Olson, Cannon, Gormley & Desruisseaux.

Her attorneys argued in court papers that "the term 'Cupcakery' is a generic term and therefore is not protectable or enforceable as a trademark under federal or Nevada state law."

They also said that with Nevada being an at-will employment state -- in which employment relationships can be terminated by either party at any time for any reason -- there is no "special relationship" between employers and employees that would have required Ballus to disclose her plans.

U.S. District Judge Kent Dawson didn't address the trademark claim, but ruled Wednesday that: "Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that the relationship between Ballus and plaintiff, her employer, was such that Ballus’s failure to disclose gives rise to a misrepresentation or fraud claim."

"While plaintiff avers that (Ballus) signed a confidentiality agreement which may give rise to the creation of a special relationship, plaintiff has failed to include the language of said agreement, or how this alleged agreement imposed upon (Ballus) a duty to disclose that she intended to move to California, that she had any intention to open a cupcake business, or that she had registered Sift as a limited liability company with the California Secretary of State," Dawson wrote in his ruling.

But the legal battle may not be over. Dawson gave attorneys for The Cupcakery 30 days to file an amended lawsuit with proof of a special relationship between Ballus and The Cupcakery that would have required Ballus to disclose her plans.

Discussion: comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

No trusted comments have been posted.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.

Most Popular

  • Viewed
  • Discussed
  • E-mailed
  • Facebook