Las Vegas Sun

September 8, 2010

Currently: 93° | Complete forecast | Log in

Alaska Airlines lawsuit continues

Friday, July 30, 2010 | 5:05 p.m.

CARSON CITY – A federal appeals court has ruled a group of Egyptian businessmen and their wives could resume suing Alaska Airlines for being removed from a flight to Las Vegas to attend convention in September 2003.

The U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed U.S. District Judge Robert Clive Jones who granted a pre-trial summary judgment in favor of the airlines. The appeals court said the case should go to a jury to determine if the pilot’s decision to bump the group was reasonable.

The appeals court said this is the first case in this country testing an international treaty called the Tokyo Convention that outlines behavior and actions to take during disruptions on flights.

The group was on a flight from Vancouver, British Columbia to Las Vegas to talk about becoming distributors for a Texas company that manufactured natural gas equipment.

The Egyptians were in first class and a ruckus developed with the flight attendants. One attendant made a second call about the troubles in the cabin to Captain Michael Swanigan that she could not handle the problem any further.

Swanigan decided to divert to Reno and called ahead for the police who were waiting at the gate when the plane landed. No criminal charges were filed and the Egyptians were cleared to return to the flight.

But Swanigan refused to allow them to board and the group was directed to another airline to get to Las Vegas.

The Egyptians didn’t get the distributors contract. And they filed suit in federal court in Las Vegas.

Chief Judge Alex Kozinski of the appeals court, who wrote the majority opinion, said a jury should have a chance to decide if Swanigan’s action was reasonable in diverting the plane initially and then refusing to allow the Egyptians back on the plane after being cleared by police in Reno.

Kozinski also said the claim by the Egyptians they were subject to defamatory statements after the incident should also go to the jury. Agreeing with him was Judge N. Randy Smith.

Federal District Judge S. James Otero of California dissented in part, saying the behavior of Captain Swanigan must be shown to be “arbitrary or capricious” at a jury trial — not the standard of reasonableness as adopted by the majority.

Otero said Swanigan was a dedicated experienced pilot who believed that an in-flight emergency required him to immediately land. He said Swanigan, vice president of flight operations for Alaska, was not “a simpleton in charge of a cockpit crew that failed to follow airline procedures and who was buffaloed by two vindictive flight attendants into needlessly diverting the flight and forcing passenger off the plane.”

Discussion: 4 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

  1. The pilot in command of any flight has the ULTIMATE authority for the SAFETY of the flight.

    The pilot in command DOES NOT have to let ANYONE on his or her airplane - for ANY reason - if the pilot in command feels the SAFETY of the flight is in jeopardy (with the exception of Law Enforcement personnel for obvious reasons).

    These goof-balls lost the contract...too bad. Hey "businessmen" in this story, next time MIND YOUR PEAS AND Q's when you get on an airplane going into or out of the United States.

    Flying on an airplane is a privilege, NOT a right.......

  2. And THANKS to Captain Michael Swanigan for looking out for the SAFETY of his passengers on that flight.....

  3. A pilot has his hands full w\o these BOZOs.
    I commend you Captain for the ability to keep the airplane air worthy and passengers safe.
    As I have learned after 20+ years in aviation
    (SAFETY FIRST).
    Next time they should charter a aircraft then
    they can make a ruckus.

  4. I have experienced first hand (and witnessed) how some flight attendants carry their authority to absurd levels, though never on Alaska.
    I think Alaska needs to lose this suit miserably to send a message to the industry that this behavior is to be avoided.

    That flight was NEVER in danger it was all about two pissed off (?and unreasonable?) flight attendants, nothing more.

    That the pilot refused to let them back on after they were cleared speaks volumes, no?

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

OR Create an account (It's free)

Spotlight

Plane crash

Plane crash

Plane crashes on residential street.

UNLV Opener

UNLV Opener

UNLV falls to Badgers in opener.

MDA Telethon

MDA Telethon

Jerry Lewis hosts annual telethon.

Do No Harm

Do No Harm

The Sun investigates hospital care in Las Vegas.

CityCenter

CityCenter

The definitive guide to MGM Mirage's newest property

Bottoming Out

Bottoming Out

Gambling addiction in Las Vegas

A gamble in the sand

A gamble in the sand

The history of Las Vegas

Elvis

Elvis

A look at the enduring bond between Las Vegas and Elvis

NASCAR Weekend

NASCAR Weekend

Full coverage of NASCAR weekend at the Las Vegas Motor Speedway

Miss America

Miss America

Stories, photos and videos from this year's pageant

New Year's Eve

New Year's Eve

Full coverage of New Year's Eve 2009

Sights Unseen

Sights Unseen

A collection of our favorite images that didn't run in 2009

Facebook Activity

Deals
  • Most Read
  • Discussed
  • Most E-mailed