Las Vegas City Council OKs contract with firefighters
Two-year pact includes city not studying privatizing EMS services
Wednesday, July 7, 2010 | 11:54 a.m.
Sun Coverage
The Las Vegas City Council today approved a new two-year contract with the city firefighters' union that amounts to a savings of $5.6 million this fiscal year and $900,000 next year for the city.
Key elements include firefighters getting no cost of living allowance and reducing some of their step pay increases.
Another key element is that the city wouldn't need to set up a "brownout" schedule to keep some firefighting vehicles off the street in order to save money in the budget.
"The main thing today is the citizens are protected again for another year for EMS, emergency medical services, and for also fire protection," said Dean Fletcher, president of International Association of Firefighters Local 1285, whose union finished ratifying the agreement Tuesday night.
"No brownouts," Fletcher said. "Response times are very important to us, but mainly to citizens."
The council approved the pact on a 5-1 vote, with the only no vote coming from Councilman Stavros Anthony.
Anthony said he didn't like the part of the agreement that would keep the city from conducting a study to privatize emergency medical services to an outside contractor until June 27, 2012.
"That disturbs me a little bit," Anthony said, explaining it worried him that it would set a precedent for a union to be able to collectively bargain away a city's ability to do a cost-saving study.
However, Mayor Oscar Goodman and Fletcher both said the agreement not to study privatizing EMS services was not part of the official contract, but was a separate side letter of agreement.
"It has no precedential value," Goodman said.
City Manager Betsy Fretwell said the reason that she tentatively agreed not to do an EMS cost-saving study was because it "tells firefighters we have faith in them."
The two-year pact covers the 2011 fiscal year, which began July 1, and the 2012 fiscal year, which begins July 1, 2011.
Details of the agreement include:
-- No cost of living (COLA) adjustment in Fiscal Year 2011, with the ability of both parties to reopen the contract for negotiation of cost of living and salary schedules in Fiscal Year 2012. Fletcher told the council that this would be the second year in a row that firefighters would not get a cost of living increase. Fretwell said the cost saving would be $2 million.
-- A 50-percent reduction in step increases in Fiscal Year 2011 and Fiscal Year 2012, and a reduction in the first step for new employees by 5 percent in Fiscal Year 2011. That amounts to a savings of about $450,000 for each year of the contract, Fretwell said.
-- No uniform allowances in Fiscal Year 2011, with the ability of both parties to reopen the contract for negotiation in Fiscal Year 2012. That saves about $900,000, Fretwell said.
-- A reduction of medical contributions by the city from $450 per pay period, per employee to $360 per pay period, per employee. In addition, instead of receiving medical contributions for 26 pay periods annually, employees will only receive them for 24 pay periods. That saves about $1.8 million, Fretwell said.
-- A reduction of the emergency medical system (EMS) documentation pay for paramedics by 50 percent in Fiscal Year 2011, with total elimination in Fiscal Year 2012. Fretwell said that would save $450,000 per year.
-- An increase in the availability of “roving staff” to 8 percent, which will reduce overtime.
-- The city agrees not to pursue a request for proposal for the privatization of EMS services for the duration of the contract.
-- An elimination of the need for “brownouts” based on the ability to restore services through the savings in this agreement.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Superstar Whitney Houston dies at 48
- Two dead after accident in downtown Las Vegas
- Instant Analysis: Debating whether UNLV should continue series with San Diego State
- Police looking for man in white Ford Explorer
- Dining Guide: 2012 Valentine’s Day options in Las Vegas
- Four people injured in car accident
- Color from the scene at Thomas & Mack Center: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
- Blog: Justin Hawkins’ steal seals UNLV’s thrilling 65-63 victory against San Diego State
- After Nevada and Florida wins, Mitt Romney trying to prove he’s ‘severely conservative’ to CPAC base
- UNLV makes key plays down stretch to hold off San Diego State 65-63
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



This isn't perfect, but it's a step in the right direction. I have never figured out why a bonus was paid for doing the paperwork right. That should be addressed on an employee's review, with appropriate disciplinary action taken if not performed correctly, i.e. no step raise or some such.
Nice idea!! I concur!!! I love you FF's and always will but boftx is right...
Why do they resist even a study of privatizing the EMS service in the city? The results are already known. The same service could be supplied at a HUGE savings to the city.
You answered your own question neiman1.
The real question is why are these elected officials afraid to take a stand and do what is best for the taxpayer.
At least Stavros Anthony had some conviction.
Private ambulance services have several major issues, and by contracting there services we the citizens would take a dramatic hit in our emergency care. Many communities have used them in the past, and have then switched back. If I remember correctly, last year around Thanksgiving, AMR was almost on strike. What happens then? That same company has left cities overnight without any warning, leaving the citizens unprotected. As Ms. Fretwell said on TV today, by reigning in the costs of the fire department the expenses of having them running the medical calls is financially justifiable, not to mention the quicker response times and quality care. Mr. Anthony, being a former cop who was still on the metro payroll as of 2009 (and was not endorsed by metro during his campaign) obviously has some beef with the fire fighters. During the meeting, he kept bringing up concerns with the contract which were then explained and alleviated by the city manager and even the mayor. Yet he kept jumping to other concerns. The man doesn't know squat on what he votes on. Anyhow, it was good for the fire dept to save the city money, so they could turn around and spend it on the mob museum, which houses 24 exhibits from the mayor (which he was paid for).
like 'em or not, I believe our fire department does and excellent job. As far as privatizing medical, if what 1-true said is correct it could be a disaster. Do we really want to take that chance?
Well, as I recall, 'bout a year ago, the private ambulance service threatened to strike... A private business is just that...PRIVATE