WATER:
Pipeline not the sole option
Authority exploring other means as predictions for Lake Mead remain grim
SAM MORRIS / LAS VEGAS SUN FILE
Rural counties’ opposition to the Southern Nevada Water Authority’s pipeline plan has been strong for many years, as this sign in Baker in 2007 shows.
Sunday, Jan. 31, 2010 | 2 a.m.
In Today's Sun
Sun Archives
- Nevada Supreme Court tosses Las Vegas claims to rural water (1-28-2010)
- Nevada Supreme Court to expedite water rights case (1-22-2010)
- Governor delays signing Utah-Nevada water-sharing pact (1-9-2010)
- Supreme Court OKs $4 million water rights settlement (12-14-2009)
- Utah, Nevada draft water agreement (8-13-09)
The Nevada Supreme Court’s ruling last week that upheaved multibillion-dollar plans to tap water from rural Nevada for the Las Vegas Valley has thrown into confusion the fate of a project that was once hailed as essential to the future of Las Vegas.
The ruling jeopardizes two decades of planning to draw water from the Great Basin to sate local needs, by concluding that the applications for water rights coveted by the Southern Nevada Water Authority had long ago expired.
This doesn’t spell the death of the pipeline project. The issue now returns to District Court. And for its part, the Water Authority reacted quickly to the court’s decision by immediately refiling its applications for water rights in eastern Nevada. The agency hopes to eventually have permission to draw water south to Las Vegas via a 300-mile pipeline.
Meanwhile, the door is open for hundreds of pipeline opponents who had been excluded from the process to finally protest the plan, a prospect that seems likely to throw more obstacles in its way.
And it’s possible that this time, the Water Authority won’t get the water.
Maybe it won’t matter.
Some members of the Water Authority’s governing board are no longer convinced the pipeline is needed. For starters, growth has stalled and the dire projections of a burgeoning city going thirsty have lost some of their urgency.
Meanwhile, the Water Authority has poured millions of dollars into a new intake valve at Lake Mead to bring water from lower lake elevations to Las Vegas, for demonstration projects at a desalination plant in Arizona and to store its extra Colorado River water in Arizona.
The Water Authority also is negotiating with Mexico over the construction of a desalination plant there in exchange for Mexico’s share of river water.
Water Authority board member and County Commissioner Steve Sisolak is calling for a new needs assessment, based on new growth projections.
Steve Sisolak
“What’s the point of doing these multibillion-dollar projects if we find out in 30 or 40 years that we don’t need them?” he said.
“I’m very supportive of the Water Authority and my constituents want to know that when they turn on the tap the water is gong to come out, but this is costing a lot of money,” he said. “There have been a lot of costly projects that have come forward. We need to be sensitive to people’s pocketbooks.”
Though the Water Authority has vowed to reapply for all the water rights it believes are in jeopardy and is even contemplating asking the Supreme Court to reconsider its ruling, any action will take time, possibly delaying pipeline construction by years.
It’s a luxury the agency may not have.
The delay comes as the Las Vegas Valley is facing yet another year of uncertain water supply, as snow pack in some parts of the Colorado River Basin, the source of 90 percent of the valley’s water, continues to dwindle. The Bureau of Reclamation predicts the water level at Lake Mead will continue to fall.
The elevation of water in the lake is expected to reach its lowest point in October, when the Bureau of Reclamation predicts it will be about 1,076 feet above sea level.
That is ominous, because when the lake drops to 1,075 feet above sea level, states that draw from the Colorado River will face rationing. In a 2007 contract between the states, brokered by the Interior Department, Nevada agreed to reduce the amount of water it takes from Lake Mead by 13,300 acre-feet a year. That’s enough water to supply 6,650 average Southern Nevada homes at today’s water usage rate.
Elevation 1,075 is also the point where the Water Authority says it will have to begin building its pipeline project. The agency in recent years has contended this option is something of a last resort — and something that wouldn’t be triggered for many years.
But this year’s river-flow projections have made the issue more pressing.
Despite recent storms, the Bureau of Reclamation’s estimates aren’t likely to improve much, bureau staff and climatologists said.
“Unless in the next 10 days it snows a whole lot, I wouldn’t say the lake level projections would look radically different,” said Robert Walsh, a Bureau of Reclamation spokesman. “We’ve had a little impact from the snow and rain that’s occurred in the lower basin ... We could have seen maybe a foot or foot and a half (rise in Lake Mead) over the last four weeks as a result of reduced water orders from agricultural districts, and snow pack did go up in some places, but what that translates into down the road, we’re not sure.”
Climatologists say it won’t likely translate into a heck of a lot of water.
That’s because El Niño years, like this year, are a win-lose scenario for the Colorado River basin. El Niño storms bring heavy winter precipitation across the southern span of the United States and dry, warm winters to the northern span. The Colorado River basin runs through both.
On the southern end, snow pack in the San Juan Mountains in Southern Colorado is at about 110 percent of normal.
But up north, on Utah’s Green River, snow pack is 60 percent to 70 percent of normal. The Green River is the main tributary to the Colorado River and provides 30 percent to 40 percent of its water. Snow pack trouble there generally means water trouble at Lake Mead, unless all the other tributaries get healthy snow pack.
And that’s not happening this year. Snow pack along the river’s other tributaries are at about 70 percent of normal so far this year. And time is running out.
The snow season is about half over and without more strong storms along the river, the year’s annual outlook could still be bad, said Desert Research Institute climatologist Kelly Redmond, who is also deputy director of the Western Regional Climate Center.
“Often in El Niño years, we rely on that southern snow pack to make up for what might not fall in the upper reaches of the Colorado,” Redmond said. “That’s not what we have now and the prospects aren’t great for that situation to change radically in the next few weeks.”
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Is Kate Upton the next Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition cover model?
- Man saves ‘60s Vegas party house, fills it with treasures
- Man kicked by officer says he still respects law enforcement
- Contraception a clear policy matter
- UNLV basketball in middle of big week of preparations for San Diego State game
- Las Vegas traffic stop leads to ‘Suge’ Knight’s arrest
- Big banks near mortgage deal with state AGs
- Sun’s Demirjian earns national award for congressional coverage
- Who would you like to see inducted into UNLV Athletics Hall of Fame?
- Teachers take protests to superintendent’s office
Blogs
Elsewhere
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Kats Report
A sophisticated look at line-moving and dog-show handicapping from Wynn's Johnny Avello
Elsewhere
Update 2: Caesars IPO pricing delayed due to "glitch" - underwriter
The Kats Report
A party replete with Carrot Top, 'AGT' contestants, a couple of Blue Men, deep-fried Oreos ... oh, and the Super Bowl (2 Comments)
High School Sports Scene
High School Hoops Picks: Week 7 (1 Comment)
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



Sometimes the solutions can be the simpler ones.
Run a pipeline from the ocean into the mojave desert. Go over the San Gabriel mountains like Mullholland did. The pipeline to Vegas is about the same distance as up to the counties where Las vegas wants to draw the water. Use Solar to desalinate the water and generate electicity. reclaim the salt and minerals from the sea water. Sell the distilled water and electricity to Vegas and LA. sell the reclaimed minerals on the open market. Also 30 to 40 percent of America's fresh water use goes to generate electricity by comventional means. Put condensers on these plants, instead of just venting the steam into the atmosphere, and that should solve the water shortage immediately and save the electric companies a bundle of money.
The reporter has some facts wrong. 13,000 acre feet would serve more than 25,000 Las Vegas households.
For those that think it is simple to go to the sea, consider that the similar challenges would exist from those who oppose such projects.
Desalination requires an enormous amount of power, and even more would be required to pump the water uphill to Las Vegas. About 30 kWh would be required to deliver 1,000 gallons of desalinated seawater to a Las Vegas home, increasing each home's energy demand by about one third. The ground water project has low energy demands because it is downhill delivery.
twocents why we take there water they did not cause this problem
they should have had the homebuilder help and developer help they the one who cause this problem
I hope Pat didn't spend her kickbacks ahead of time.
Nice to see the most powerful Senator in the history of Nevada solving the problem. And his son, the powerful Clark County Chair. And let's not forget all that the Mayor has done. Of course, the Governor is also working on the problem.
The problem at the forefront for them is re-election; not water. As long as the fountains dazzle the visitors and the golf courses are green and the toilets flush, all is well in Las Bugsy.
Yet you people keep on electing them and expecting things to be different. Without doubt, Vegas is the greatest collection of morons ever assembled in a single place.
Build a pipeline through California to the Pacific Ocean? The regulatory and environmental process would take 20 years if not longer. How much support from the California Legislature do we Nevadans really expect for us to build a pipleine through Mojave Desert tortoise habitat?
Get real.
This is all just GAMBLING with our water future. Nothing more.
With a micro-meager and paltry .3%, that's right, .3% (point three) percent allocation to Clark County of all the water flowing down the Colorado, relying on nature to save us is about the same as gambling on hitting megabucks on the first pull.
The water we've 'stored' is water we had to BUY, at a premium.
Phony tricksters SNWA are. They were hoping you wouldn't ask, let alone ever know, about their corrupt and over-the-top practices.
Our goose is cooked and we know who to thank for it...
WizardofOz doesn't have correct facts either. Nevada gets almost 1.8 percent of the Colorado. Not much, but a lot more than the 0.3 percent you suggested.
I find it absurd that many of the commentators are berating an agency that has successfully sustained this community on such a limited water resource. Particularly when so many have limited knowledge (or misinformation) of the region's water issues.
While much of the water stored was "purchased" from Arizona, a lot of it is water that the community conserved.
You don't even need to build a pipeline. For the billions we are seeking to spend on the eastern Nevada boondoggle, we could build a desalination plant in California and trade them that water for Colorado river water. If CA tries to complain about building a desalination plant, build it in Mexico and pipe the water to CA from there.
overbuilding and overdeveloping an environment in the desert is asking for trouble. where does the authority plan to get funding for the planned pipeline?
If Las Vegas would simply price their water for what it's worth, there would be no water shortage.
There for a minute I thought the headline said " Crackpipe not the sole solution. Then I read they were talking bout water. I better have another Bud Light.
The pipeline is a great idea for -CALIFORNIA TO BUILD. Please people do YOUR OWN RESEARCH INSTEAD OF READING IT AND NOT DIVING DEEPER INTO THE ISSUE. Las VEgas ONLY gets 400,000 acre feet a year from lake mead. California gets 30 MILLION! Las vegas is NO WHERE NEAR RUNNING OUT OF WATER. It is CALIFORNIA THAT SHOULD BE FORCED TO CUT BACK OR DESALINATE THE REST OF THE STATES ALONG THE COLORADO SHOULD GET THE BIGGEST SHARES NOT THE STATE THAT IS NEXT TO THE OCEAN ANYWAYS.