Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
StumblePolitical Memo:
Open government is a promise seldom kept
Most of the wrangling on Nevada’s budget deficit, as with the U.S. health care reform debate, has been behind closed doors
TIFFANY BROWN / LAS VEGAS SUN FILE
Gov. Jim Gibbons, who has complained about lawmakers meeting behind closed doors in the past, has himself been meeting with department heads and legislators on the state’s $900 million budget deficit and ways of dealing with the crisis.
Sunday, Jan. 31, 2010 | 2 a.m.
Sun Coverage
Sun Archives
- $4 billion in local revenue might play in state budget game (1-30-2010)
- State budget comes up $800 million short (1-22-2010)
- Forecast: Economy will begin to rebound in mid-2011 (1-22-2010)
- Gibbons’ no-talk order further divides branches (1-22-10)
- Governor candidate Brian Sandoval floats budget plan (1-13-2010)
- Special session may require help of state Supreme Court (1-10-2010)
- State budget director: Prep for another 10 percent cut (12-15-2009)
Transparency is the kissed baby of political rhetoric, an unassailable position for politicians.
President Barack Obama, state legislators, Gov. Jim Gibbons and his campaign opponents — Democrats and Republicans — all have promised to swing wide the shutters so the public can see how their tax dollars are haggled over and the future of the state and nation are shaped.
Then reality, or maybe just expediency, hits and the promises seldom translate into something the public can see.
At the start of the 2009 legislative session, Senate Majority Leader Steven Horsford, D-Las Vegas, promised a new day for the Legislature, one of openness with lawmakers doing the people’s business in public.
Indeed, public hearings on the budget were held. But when crunch time came, the doors slammed shut and lawmakers did the real debating on the other side.
Gibbons, left outside with the media, blasted the closed-door meetings.
During the presidential campaign, Obama also promised openness and transparency. C-SPAN cameras would capture health care negotiations.
When that didn’t materialize, Republicans pounced.
Gibbons sent a letter to U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. “The issue of government transparency isn’t a partisan issue,” Gibbons wrote in the Jan. 6 missive. “I urge you to redouble your efforts to increase transparency now.”
Nevada faces a new round of budget cuts. And important decisions affecting the future of the state will soon be made.
Gibbons has met with state department heads. Legislators have met with the governor. And once again, the doors have been closed.
Despite his previous protests, Gibbons has found reasons why now is no time for transparency.
Department heads have delivered to Gibbons scenarios outlining budget cuts of 6 percent, 8 percent and 10 percent, which the governor’s office has refused to release.
Why not let the public in on the ramifications of these cuts?
Gibbons’ spokesman Dan Burns said the documents name jobs that could be eliminated and could cause anxiety for state workers.
“Transparency is good, but if one of the 10 percent budget suggestions is to close one of state’s museums, why talk about that now?” Burns said. “Why add two months of anxiety for those workers? Why not wait until there’s a decision?”
Still, when the Sun said it would accept a version with any proposed job cuts redacted, the governor’s office still declined.
Gibbons’ staff has called his recent gatherings with lawmakers “open door meetings” — that is until the media began asking why the public wasn’t allowed inside. In reality, the meetings are open to the public if you happen to be one of the public who is an assemblyman or senator.
Although the governor and legislators have had their differences, both have agreed so far not to talk about specific proposals on how to deal with the $900 million budget deficit — one of the most severe in state history.
“As soon as you add the news media, it immediately turns into Barnum & Bailey,” said Burns, a former TV news reporter for the Las Vegas Fox affiliate. “Without the news media, you can sit down — there’s no pontificating — and get right down to business.”
The public will be able to weigh in on any solutions, Burns said.
When asked when exactly that would happen, he recommended citizens call their assemblymen or senators to find out what’s happening, rather than monitoring it through the media.
John Wonderlich, policy director of the Washington-based Sunlight Foundation, a nonpartisan, nonprofit group dedicated to openness in government, said some promises of openness are never met.
Take Obama’s promise to open health care negotiations.
“That was probably naive,” Wonderlich said. “He should’ve done more to live up to the promise, but it was also a promise that was near impossible to live up to.”
The same might be true of the state budget negotiations, the wrangling and deliberation that come with governing the state. So say longtime observers and participants in state government.
Although they didn’t want to be quoted out of fear they would appear opposed to transparency, they said that to get things done it’s easiest if the public isn’t watching.
“At the end of the day,” one said, “the public elects these people to go into a room and make these decisions.”
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- UNLV can move forward without the burden of losing streak to San Diego State
- A wife’s wisdom shows birth control issue needn’t be divisive
- Motorcycle accident claims life of man in northeast valley
- Surprise links, negotiated deals addressed by commissioners
- Hope and change and … what’s missing?
- New York mayor has the right idea
- We don’t need a CEO in charge
- Paying our own way
- Country has ‘given’ citizens a lot
- Jerry Tarkanian: Mike Moser impresses yet again on a day to remember former Rebel greats
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
I agree with Nevada's handling of the deficit to this point. Gibbons should meet privately with the department heads and discuss solutions to the problem. Then Gibbons should meet with the legislature and decide (publicly or in private) how to handle the problem. Then it should be made public.
In Obama's case, he has a very unhealthy relationship with big union bosses and has meted out too many favors as payback for their backing in his election to the office of president. The best example is the deal he struck for the unions to be exempt from paying the "Cadillac" taxes for the health care bill. It was also unconstitutional. Harry Reid paid big money for Alabama's and Nebraska's senators to vote for the health care bill. This too was unconstitutional. Obama takes great pride in side-stepping the Constitution as it is a piece of paper that stands in the way of his agenda. In this debate and other debates on Capitol Hill, they should be covered by C-SPAN. There are too many deals being made and the public should be aware of the lack of constitutional procedure and see for themselves whether or not their representatives are getting rich while selling out the people they represent.
We have a right to be wary of the types of deals struck by our representatives and if they are found to be fraudulent, coerced, unconstitutional or self-beneficial, then we should vote those individuals out of office!!! Maybe they should also be prosecuted!
Good-bye Harry and Taxus!! Obama you are gone in 2012!!
Ha! The reason none of the 'bought off' Politicos would ever want you to SEE, let alone KNOW, what kind of deals they're cutting behind your back is that, in reality, THEIR 'DONATORS' and NOT the POLITICOS ARE MAKING THE POLITICAL CALLS. THE POLITICOS JUST VOTE LIKE THEY'RE TOLD TO VOTE BY THEIR 'DONATORS'.
Not by you.
Never by not you. Ever.
"It's easier to get things done" is a bunch of B.S. You, as a watcher, would not be permitted to speak or act, only observe.
This load a' dung has been profligated for years here 'cause these 'bought off' Politicos don't want you watchin' what they do.
They absolutely don't want you seeing how 'Special Interest Lobbyists' (most of whom are either lawyers, ex-Politicos or both) get inside access. Some sit right next to or behind their 'Politico Puppets' while the backdoor 'voting' and deal cutting takes place.
It's a scene right out of the 'Godfather'. And it happens with your tax money.
Open Government. A first order oxymoron that only a believer in the tooth-fairy would believe...
The door I like best says "EXIT".
I expect to see a whole ****-pot load of 'em going through it this election.
Then we'll just have to do it again until they get the message. Politicos are the biggest morons in the world.
Anybody that believes that there is transparency in government is a fool.