Tuesday, Feb. 23, 2010 | 2 a.m.
Sun Archives
- Some parents upset over proposed school zone changes (10-21-2009)
- School zoning options get another look (3-12-2009)
- High school zoning options back on the table (3-10-2009)
- School District gives green light to zoning changes (3-4-2009)
- Parents get ready to fight school rezoning (2-19-2009)
- To soothe rezoning woes, Liberty's principal touts programs (2-18-2009)
- Zoning options OK’d, move to School Board for approval (1-30-2009)
- Commission keeps students in community together (1-29-2009)
- Summerlin school likely to go to year-round schedule (1-26-2009)
- Six Henderson elementaries could switch to 12-month calendar (1-26-2009)
- Several attendance zoning options still on the table (1-23-2009)
- District could make boundaries apply only to future students (1-15-2009)
- Parents in northwest valley want boundary changes delayed (1-14-2009)
- Panel suggests hundreds of students shuffle schools next year (1-13-2009)
- School zoning proposals prompt heated debate (1-13-2009)
Sun archives
For all the hot-button educational issues debated at school board meetings, nothing is as sure to bring out a crowd of parents than to tell them that their children might be assigned to a different campus.
It’s an issue you won’t hear much about — much less care about — until it involves your family. And then you care a lot, and battle lines are drawn.
Such is the prospect tonight when the Clark County School Board discusses the enrollment footprints for four elementary schools that will open in August to relieve overcrowded campuses — Shirley and Bill Wallin in Anthem Highlands, Evelyn Stuckey in Southern Highlands, and Vincent Triggs and Ruby Duncan, both in North Las Vegas.
You might think the slowdown in student enrollment growth — enrollment actually declined in 2009 — would bring relief from the annual zoning nightmare. But in fact, the Clark County School District expects even more anguished and angry families in coming years, as it shuffles seats to fine-tune the enrollment equilibrium. And unlike much of the past 10 years, the district will be asking more students to move among existing schools versus offering the lure of a bright, shiny new campus.
Arranging and rearranging attendance boundaries was a constant exercise during the district’s boom years, when ground was broken on a new school site every month. Reassigning students from their schools to new schools was an excruciating exercise for the district and parents alike, and there was no relief, no way to avoid it.
But this fall marks the completion of the district’s 1998 capital campaign, which has built more than 100 schools with help from a voter-approved $3.5 billion bond measure. The final four campuses open in August. When the 2011-12 academic year begins, it will be the first time in 16 years that the district will not have a new school.
Reconciling the shifting equation of student enrollment may be the ultimate calculus problem facing the district.
For instance, Wallin Elementary will open in August to alleviate overcrowding at surrounding campuses in Henderson’s Anthem Highlands.
One plan would move 500 students from the crowded Elise Wolff Elementary. But that will leave Wolff with empty seats, so those might be filled in a year by students attending the crowded Frank Lamping Elementary. (Lamping students can move in August if they want.)
Parents at top-achieving Wolff say removing 500 students — and at least 17 teachers — this fall, only to rebuild the enrollment with Lamping students and hire teachers in a year will hurt its academic programs.
Complicating matters: The district is planning to launch a school-choice initiative in 2011 that would allow students to apply to attend any campus with open seats. Based on those plans, Wolff could also see its numbers jump, requiring more teachers be hired.
Such decisions also have to be reconciled with a school’s geographic identity, a task that can prove as challenging as walking a tightrope. Students may be assigned to a school not because it is closest to their home address, but to promote the district’s goal of having socioeconomically diverse campuses.
Because rezoning has become the norm rather than the exception, the district has discouraged the argument that a campus “belongs” to a particular neighborhood. At the same time, schools push for increased involvement by parents and families.
Whenever the district rezones schools, there’s always drama over who is perceived as winning or losing the battle. This year’s fight over Lamping Elementary has been particularly contentious, amid allegations by critics that parents living in the wealthy enclave of Anthem Country Club are demanding an unfair degree of protection from being reassigned to another school.
Such allegations are unfair, said Sandy Miller, wife of former Gov. Bob Miller, who has been active at Lamping since her daughter enrolled there in 1999. In reality, Miller said, her neighbors at Anthem Country Club are asking for the same consideration anyone should receive — the right “to stay at a school they are highly invested in.”
One reason Lamping is one of the district’s top schools is the high level of involvement by parents, grandparents and extended families, many of whom live in Anthem Country Club, Miller said.
She suggested the district make Wolff a nine-month school, which might be a more attractive option to some families who dislike the year-round calendar at Lamping. There could be other families who would want to follow Michael O’Dowd, former principal of Lamping, to his new job at Wallin, Miller said.
But Sharon Dattoli, the district’s zoning director, said making Wolff a nine-month school isn’t an option because the district needs to assign enough students to the campus to reduce overcrowding at Lamping.
And although Wallin will open as a nine-month school, the district projects it will need to go year-round within two to three years. It wouldn’t be fair to promise families a nine-month calendar in exchange for voluntarily leaving Lamping, Dattoli said.
School Board Vice President Carolyn Edwards, a past chairwoman of the zoning advisory commission, said she’s in favor of “phasing,” which means students who are currently assigned to a school would be able to finish out their time there, while only new students would be affected by proposed changes to boundary lines. That’s what she plans to propose tonight when the discussion shifts to boundary recommendations for Foothill, Coronado and Green Valley high schools, also sources of significant controversy and concern.
“The downturn is an opportunity to step back and look at how we zone,” Edwards said. “This may be our chance to come up with some more family-friendly options.”
Dattoli agreed, but noted “we might not be moving as many children as we have in the past, but we’re still going to have to deal with these issues. And it’s still going to be very painful, and we’re probably not going to make everyone happy.”








Why does the school district always make a catastrophe of a simple solution? Require all students to attend the closest school. If parents want their children to attend a certain school when seats are available, the parents would be responsible for all transportation and cost. No exceptions.
NoMore,
I'm not sure it's that easy. Schools fill up and new ones are built. (The last wave of new schools being the one that Emily is writing about here.)
And when a new school is plopped down among crowded ones, that prompts a shift of students from the crowded school(s) to the new campus. And that's the reassignment that causes grief for some families.
I live out by the Lamping, and Wolff corridor, and I hear a variance of complaints from some of the folks out here. One problem out here is that folks in my area are highly political and vocal when it comes to their kids' education. So I feel for the CCSD officials.
@PierreBeauRegard
Yep, I too live in Lamping Zone & it's a very charged group of parents that want their way. When politics is involved it gets ugly. I just don't want my child on a bus when I stay less than a mile away from Lamping.
Why are they waiting a year to move the Lamping kids to Wolff? That is ridiculous and a disservice to both schools (Lamping & Wolff). As for the Anthem Country Club parents being "highly invested" into this school, is not an argument. ALL of the parents that have had children attend Lamping have been equally involved in this school. Both of my children have gone to Lamping and the Sunridge and Coventry parents equally shared in the success of the school and the programs. Yes, we too contributed and volunteered. Half of Sunridge has been re-zoned to Glen Taylor already and those kids were within walking distance of the school. I have no sympathy for Country Club.
The bottom line is that Country Club just does not want to move and feel entitled due to donations to the science center. They rejected moving to Wallin and now fight to stay out of Wolff. Kids have to move and that community is directly in the middle of Wolff & Wallin. Stop whining and make the move that everyone else in this valley has had to do.
Last year, my high school daughter was moved from Coronado to Liberty. Guess what? I used the opportunity to teach her about change and how to cope. Why? Because it is part of life and if you can't cope with making new friends etc, then it will be a hard cold world. Furthermore, we as a family are bringing all of the great ideas and energy to our new school to help make that a better school and build up the band program.
Yes, I'm aware that these are elementary children. They actually are the most resilient and the shool board supposedly moves enough kids of 300 or more to lessen the feeling of being singled out. That is not an excuse. No matter what 500 + kids are moving to Wallin, so Country Club kids are not special and have no complaint that there kids can't cope to move. Kids are moving and no one is crying from Highlands and Madeira Canyon about being forced to move from Wolff. Why? Because it is inevitable. They too are leaving a school, friends and teachers that they have known too.
Change is a part of life and THOUSANDS of students have been rezoned just last year. How many times has Anthem Country club kids been rezoned? None!! and NO Del Webb MS does not count.
Basir,
The Anthem Country Club kids are not within walking distance and are several miles from the school and are given busses. The elementary students do not walk down Anthem Parkway. Remember these are kids that 11 years and younger. The kids that are within walking distance of Lamping are only Sunridge students and some in Coventry, who are remaining at the school per the proposals.
do any of the azac trustees live in the acc area???
aren't they trying to rezone the high school in that area too - to shift kids from foothills to coronado???
why does the sun hardly ever do any digging???
dig emily dig!!!
@LVCarpa. . .
My argument is not for the CC since I don't live there. My argument is for Sundridge & the kids in that community.
I have been through this issue for years, not in the Anthem area, but in the Summerlin area. I have a few questions? In times of economic crisis in our community, why are we paying to bus children to another school, when they can walk to a school and save the cost of bussing? If the children in Anthem need to take a bus to get to an elementary school anyway, shouldn't they be bussed to the one with empty seats which would disrupt fewer students, keep neighborhood children together and save $$. When they changed the zoning in my neighborhood to a less desirable middle school, lots of parents used fake addresses to attend the better middle school in the neighborhood. Why force parents to lie? Why do we have "moms" on the AZAC board making these decisions? They all have their own agendas, and their own children and neighborhoods to protect. Shouldn't "professionals" make these decisions? What other big city school districts let interested, non elected officials make these type of recommendations. This is craziness.....
Last year, against all logical arguments using Regulation 7111 (the Board's guidelines for school rezones) my children were zoned from Coronado to Liberty. We were told that overcrowding at Coronado and the wasted seats at Liberty, were a catastrophe that couldn't be ignored.
This year, no mention of the 600+ vacant seats at Liberty, or the 500+ extra students at Coronado. But they do want to hard zone students into Coronado from the MacDonald Ranch/ Roma Hills community. Those neighborhoods live closer to Liberty High, than our neighborhood, but consideration for Liberty was no where to be found.
If this isn't a blatant effort to accommodate the privileged, by our elected officials, can you tell me what it is? Trustees, explain yourselves!
I would also like to add that you, Emily Richardson, were there last year, when Carolyn Edwards visited us. What do you say about this year's agenda? Would you care to explain your actions, last year? Or do you have an explanation of the Boards actions?
BKlyngal,
I totally agree with you. The conflict of interest and political ties to the members of the AZAC board and even the trustees is deep. A third party would be more impartial but then the community would complain too.
Anthem Country Club kids are not within the walking distance of any school and are already supposed to be bussed to Lamping and should have no hardship being bussed to Wolff. I don't understand the 1 year stagger to not move them until school year 2011-2012. I think there is some backroom deal to allow them to opt to remain at Lamping with the phasing program.
Last year it was Carolyn Edwards who voted against the phasing of Coronado to Liberty students and was very vocal against it. What's changed? My answer would be the 'affected' group this year is seen as more politically volatile and influential. Why would you phase elementary kids? I understand middle school and high school due to sports etc, but elementary should be hard- zoned.
The staff at Wolff has already said that the one year wait to get the Anthem CC kids with the removal of the 17 teachers is going to adversely affect the kids. The professionals are saying basically move the kids for next school year. I've never seen a 'delayed' zone change before. The question should be why? and why only for this group?
The travesty is that last year that they moved less than 150 kids from Coronado to Liberty due to all of the empty seats at Liberty and the overcrowding at Coronado.
This year at Coronado, even with the zone change, there was basically no change in enrollmentment. They were told that they weren't moving enough kids to make a difference so why were they just moving 150 kids? So now this year, Coronado is still overcrowded by 700-800 kids. But the kicker is this, they are moving more kids into the school from Foothill. It is insulting to the families that were moved last year. The CCSD also said that they wouldn't do a zone change 2 years in a row at any school.
The Roma Hills/ MacDonald Highlands area that they are moving into Coronado is a luxury community located over Sun City Macdonald. It is that eye sore area that they dug out of the mountainscape. They want to be zoned for Coronado to help sell those expensive homes. It is all political. How else can you explain a school that is over 700 to 800 students is getting more students and from an affluent neighborhood? Foothill was actually less crowded than Coronado and it was dropped last year because the existing kids didn't want to leave. This is developer driven and the people that contribute to the Trustees re-election campaigns live in the luxury neighborhoods.
I advocate going back to the impartial professional third party system for zoning recommendations with public comment periods.
I'm going to love watching the phasing program and then the ACLU suing the CCSD for discriminatory practices when all of the students than can afford to leave low-achieving or high minority areas leave. It will happen and that is the excuse as to why they haven't deconsolidated CCSD is the fear of a disportionate school district of 'haves' and 'have nots'. It is inevitable and they will have done it to themselves and then watch the reversal of the zoning back to 'hard zones'. They need to stop being a political influenced body and do the right things for our students.
hey lvc...
guess what...
they are going to move some kids from coronado to green valley to make room for the move of the kids from foothills to coronado...
it's a joke...
hey emily...
it's a joke...
dig emily dig...
report emily report...
http://azac.ccsd.net/flyers%20recommenda...
hey emily...
here's a good place to start...
just tell us readers where all of the trustees live...
i think your readers would find that very very interesting...
You can bet your last dollar that chidlren of some select Trustees and school administrators will not have to tranfer to another school. It is cool to be in a power position as a trustee or administrator.
These decisions are not gut wrenching when they involve children of others. I don't think any children of Trustees or administrators have to travel across town to another school because of overcrowding in their original assigned home school. Those same kids are assigned classes of the best teachers, all have books, plenty of class supplies and discipline is well maintained in those classes. Rest assured power of position has its priveleges and that power is being used every day.
Emily are you an investigative reporter or are you seeking a future job as press spokesperson for the CCSD? Is that why your school reports always have a 'soft, tender, alomost appologetic touch' when it comes to discussing the CCSD and its inherent ineptness in such matters as this one?
vsestini, you're up early! The trustee meeting was interesting last night. Let me put my 2 cents in while I still remember stuff.
The southeast high school zoning grid is a jumbled mess due to fast growth over the last 20 years, coupled with odd placements of high schools. I know CCSD was at the mercy of the builders, in relation to the locations of these high schools. Be that as it may, the Trustees are in charge of establishing a policy to govern zone changes. It's known as regulation 7111. Is it subjective? Of course. There is plenty of wiggle room to make "creative" hard zones. However, no where in regulation 7111 can you find "we were here first and we don't want to move" or "we are more politically, financially connected and we don't want to move" as guidelines.
Plus, there is the "focus group notification", that someone sets, that determines what groups will be considered for zone changes. It's like a parliamentary procedure trick, that sets some neighborhoods "off limits" to any zone changes for that year. Who makes that determination, and why?
Let me reiterate my earlier statement. There is an overcrowding problem in the SE district for high schools (Coronado +500; Foothills +300). There are 700+ available seats at Liberty High School, and 40 available seats at Green Valley. I don't know the situation at Basic, or Silverado, but there you have the 6 high schools in Henderson. With growth stabilizing, what is wrong with tearing the grid off all schools (in Henderson) and rezoning with logical, geometric boundaries (instead of the gerrymandering look we have now)?
You don't need a third party to come in and do this. The board made a tough call last night, against the wishes of the Anthem Country Club, that showed hard zones can be done.
Of course, this could be done much easier, if we were to split CCSD into 4 or 5 smaller school districts, wouldn't it?
if CCSD had any balls at all, they would move EVERYONE based on numbers. no where else have i seen such incompetency in a school board. janison is joke, as are most of the other members.
grow a pair, janison, since your husband doesn't have any either. someone has to be the man in your family.