Environment:
Preserving the bird that lives in trees that siphon precious water
A tamarisk bush grows out of the water along the shore of Lake Mojave near Cottonwood Cove.
Monday, Feb. 1, 2010 | 2 a.m.
Sun Archives
- The small oversight that threatens the valley’s big pipeline proposal (1-31-2010)
- Nevada Supreme Court tosses Las Vegas claims to rural water (1-28-2010)
- Nevada Supreme Court to expedite water rights case (1-22-2010)
- Governor delays signing Utah-Nevada water-sharing pact (1-9-2010)
- Supreme Court OKs $4 million water rights settlement (12-14-2009)
- Utah, Nevada draft water agreement (8-13-09)
Sometimes in nature, the simplest solutions lead to the most convoluted results.
Take the saltcedar tree, one of the greatest scourges of the West; it chokes out native plants, sucks up water like a sponge and ruins recreation spots.
And it might have been good news that there’s a small, voracious insect — the tamarisk beetle, moving into the area from the north that, left on its own, seems destined to devour and kill the saltcedars that are clogging washes and sucking them dry.
But the saltcedar is now protecting itself with a hostage: the endangered Southwestern Willow flycatcher, a songbird that has adopted the plant as its habitat.
In the face of this ecological challenge, land managers are scraping together a desperate plan to save the bird and reinstate native ecology.
Federal agencies and conservation groups are on the hunt for money to introduce their strategy at Lake Mohave and along the Virgin River.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service hopes to land a federal stimulus grant in the next few months to pay for a crew of chainsaw-wielding contractors to clear a couple of hundred acres of saltcedar in the best bird habitat spots alongside Lake Mohave and replace them with native vegetation to serve the flycatchers while the beetles destroy the other stands of saltcedar.
There is urgency in their work, because the beetles are on their way.
In this ecological melodrama, here’s the playbill:
The tamarisk
Tamarix trees, known locally as saltcedar or tamarisks, were introduced in the United States from Western Asia in the late 19th century as a fast-growing windbreak. But the hardy trees’ massive annual seed output allowed them to spread quickly, settling in creeks and washes where they pushed out native cottonwood and willow trees.
They’re easy to kill — a bulldozer or fire will do it — but they’re so quick to sprout new saplings that cleared riverbanks need constant maintenance in order for natives to re-establish.
The invasive saltcedar is no friend to the desert. It provides little shade, supports few birds and bugs, and significantly increases the salt content in soil. The tree drives out hawks and eagles and most of the smaller plants that would have been able to thrive under the canopy of a billowy willow or tall cottonwood.
“If you’ve spent any time in the back country in Southern Nevada and sat down under one of these wonderful cottonwood or willow trees, there are all these little plants and all the animals around you,” said U.S. Forest Service Vegetation Chief Alice C. Newton. “Contrast that with a thicket of tamarisk — nobody wants to walk through that, even animals. There’s almost no shade unless you’re huddled underneath and the ground isn’t covered with babbling brooks and leaves. It’s all tamarisk duff. It’s about as ugly a monoculture as you can get.”
Most damaging about the tree is its tremendous water consumption. Saltcedars are estimated to use a million acre-feet of Colorado River water every year — about four times the amount consumed by Southern Nevada annually.
Removing the saltcedars “benefits all Colorado River users by conserving billions of gallons of water,” Southern Nevada Water Authority spokesman J.C. Davis said. “We have been monitoring the beetle strategy, and early results give cause for optimism.”
The beetle
The quarter-inch-long tamarisk beetle originates in China and two areas of Kazakhstan in western Asia, where they are so voracious they often must be attacked with insecticides to protect the native tamarix stands.
It is a singularly focused insect, eating little else. It has other benefits in the war against the saltcedar: the beetle doesn’t produce the air pollution that would result from burning saltcedar trees, doesn’t taint soil as would herbicides, and is cheaper than running bulldozers.
The flycatcher
The endangered Southwestern Willow flycatcher, a small songbird that lives along tree-covered riverbanks in the desert Southwest, was forced out of native cottonwood and willow stands for the encroaching saltcedar.
The slow destruction of the saltcedar could be a good thing for the flycatcher except that the beetles kill the trees after the birds have nested, leaving them vulnerable to sun and predators, and native vegetation can’t grow back fast enough to create new nesting sites.
The scene
The beetle is wending its way down the Virgin River from St. George, Utah, where it was wrongly released by researchers in 2006, and from other parts of Utah.
Wildlife experts expect it to be established at Lake Mead by 2013.
In the wake of the St. George release, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Maricopa Audubon Society in 2009 successfully sued to stop further releases of the insect, claiming the government should have known the beetle could survive further south, killing saltcedar and putting the flycatcher at risk.
“This is very serious because if they get below Lake Mead, we’ll lose the flycatcher in Arizona and New Mexico,” Center for Biological Diversity co-founder Robin Silver said. “Because of the blunders and corruption of (government) officials, we’re looking at an extinction.”
But there are no efforts to halt the spread of the tamarisk beetle. Beetle studies across the West are wrapping up, including those in Northern Nevada, which loses its funding this month. Researchers here have mostly moved on to other projects or moved out of state.
“At this point we decided we’ll not promote any further movement of the tamarisk beetle in Nevada, but we’re not putting forth any proposals to (kill) the beetles that are eating the saltcedar,” Nevada state entomologist Jeff Knight said.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Coolican: Henderson officials out of loop on police brutality case, raising red flags
- See mug shots of 16 arrested in stolen-property police sting
- Lumberjacks — ‘Where the Big Boys Eat’ — hiring for North Las Vegas location
- Berkley draws stark contrasts with Heller over immigration
- Send your loved one a virtual Vegas Valentine’s Day card right now
- Howard Miller, prominent lawyer and ‘true Las Vegas native,’ dies at 68
- Short memories may serve president
- Saying ‘No mas’ to government
- Police looking for man in white Ford Explorer
- Hispanic Museum of Nevada settles into new home
Blogs
The Kats Report
Live color from the scene at Thomas & Mack Center: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



Actually, the beetles were released by the City of St. George.
http://www.cityweekly.net/utah/article-7...
Walking along the Wetlands Park I noticed there are less Tamarisk now but more reeds and cattails. I'd prefer the latter two at least it cleans the water if anything while the Tamarisk releases salt to our sources of water aside from sucking it dry. Over at Lake Mead there is an overabundance of Tamarisk, I hope authorities try to get rid of this invasive tree while we still have water left at Lake Mead. Save the people!!!
The problem is not the federal government. It was the ranchers and farmers who introduced this non native species years ago. SO they could make more profit.
We now have to deal with this short term greed related decision.
We should tax ranchers and corporate farmers to pay to restore our ecosystem.
Profit and greed costs everyone(except the rich people) in one way or another.
The tamarisk biocontrol program, rather than being a nefarious act of greed, naivete, nasty federal government agents or whatever, has in fact been a 20-plus year program by a large consortium of folks in response to requests by land mangers, wildlife biologists, environmentalists, water managers and many others to help find a safe and cost-effective way to reduce the abundance and impacts of this noxious weed. Our program also has documented increased diversity and abundance of songbirds in response to the beetle's presence in northern Nevada, and we anticipate seeing the same here in Clark County and the Virgin River...with a large team of researchers and land managers involved in that monitoring effort, which also includes numerous riparian restoration elements. 'Dsyzdek' is correct that the beetles were brought from central Utah to St. George and released by local managers, to address real problems, not without some potential risk but with reasoned confidence that the risk/benefit ratio was heavily skewed towards the positive.
Cut the trees down and burn them and the area clear, when its not the birds breading season. The birds will adapt and the wild life will be better able to get to the water.
Do they use more or less water than some moron sitting in front of a slot machine?
(With a 15 foot taproot, all you're going to do by cutting them down is see them proliferate)